Merged Suggs To Sf Rumors/discussion Threads

[52Kia Kaha92]

[url="http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/05/02/saturday-morning-one-liners-3/"]http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/05/02/...g-one-liners-3/[/url]

What does that mean, secound from the bottom it says

[quote]The San Francisco 49ers have not engaged in discussions regarding Julius Peppers and Terrell Suggs, according to General Manager Scot McCloughan.[/quote]

I know it says they havent discussed but does this mean that ozzie has said he can be traded for the right price or something, is he on the block, comparing him to Julius Peppers who every one knows wants out scares me a bit.

Thoughts on this

[mhead66]

[quote name='52Kia Kaha92' post='189301' date='May 2 2009, 07:14 PM']I know it says they havent discussed but does this mean that ozzie has said he can be traded for the right price or something, is he on the block, comparing him to Julius Peppers who every one knows wants out scares me a bit.

Thoughts on this [/quote]
It says it wasn't discussed - but, with those words, it's assumed it's possible.

Of course, the truth is, everyone is "on the block", at all times - for the right price. Just like they say at contract time, "it's a business"...

[Moderator 3]

Unless Suggs signs his franchise papers, we can't trade him. He is currently not under contract.

[Guest Moderator8]

Profootballtalk.com is a bunch of hacks. I wouldn't pay any attention to it.

[BloodRaven]

[quote name='Moderator8' post='189311' date='May 2 2009, 07:35 PM']Profootballtalk.com is a bunch of hacks. I wouldn't pay any attention to it.[/quote]

Exactly, stirring the pot.

[kash96ravenstotalfan]

[quote name='mhead66' post='189303' date='May 2 2009, 07:24 PM']It says it wasn't discussed - but, with those words, it's assumed it's possible.

Of course, the truth is, everyone is "on the block", at all times - for the right price. Just like they say at contract time, "it's a business"...[/quote]
Find it hard to believe that the Ravens would let Suggs go!

[52Kia Kaha92]

well IMO if suggs doesnt get 10 + sacks this year id like to trade him for a 1st round pick. Yes i know he is more than jsut a pass rusher but when he came out he was a liability against the run and pass but we tought him up so why cant we teach up other guys. Suggs is a great run stopper and one of the best against the pass from a 3-4 OLB standpoint but we need a pass rushing monster to generate pressure every play, Suggs cant do that when he is one on one.

So unless he gets 10 sacks this year i say we tarde him next year for a first and then draft a WR and OLB in the first round

Round 1 (from SF) - Arelious Benn
Round 1 (BAL) - Sergio Kindle

Suggs is a great player but he wants too much and he doesnt give us enough IMO to warrant 80 million dollars

[RavensIQ]

Maybe with Peppers being Franchised and rumors flying around that he's available for trade, people assume Suggs is as well?

The first I've ever heard of it, doubt there's any real substance to the rumor. But then again maybe negotiations are so far apart between the 2 sides that the Ravens aren't willing to pay that much $$ to Suggs? It could be possible, but I highly doubt it.

[Bullrush]

[quote name='52Kia Kaha92' post='189301' date='May 2 2009, 07:14 PM']What does that mean[/quote]
It means some moron beat writer brought up a bunch of names of guys that could be available via trade and the GM said those names never came up. You're overreacting a little bit. If Ozzie wanted to trade Suggs he would make it public in order to get the best offer he can, and not keep it secret so that nobody knows about it.

[Tonymontana45]

I personally wish he was, I feel he is way overrated for the amount of money he wants. He is not worth 10 mill a year, period. He does deserve a payday but no more then 6-7 maybe.

[Ravens52]

It would take a heavy price to do it..


Although if we were.. I would pray that Crabtree would be thrown in..

[shaikh015]

[quote name='52Kia Kaha92' post='189301' date='May 2 2009, 07:14 PM'][url="http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/05/02/saturday-morning-one-liners-3/"]http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/05/02/...g-one-liners-3/[/url]

What does that mean, secound from the bottom it says



I know it says they havent discussed but does this mean that ozzie has said he can be traded for the right price or something, is he on the block, comparing him to Julius Peppers who every one knows wants out scares me a bit.

Thoughts on this [/quote]
NO!

[Sizzle]

Speculations.... speculations... oh to answer your question NO.

[jezzy]

its been reported on the scott n anita show that the 49ers are intrested in trade a first ruond pick cuz they have 2 next year to get either suggs from the ravens and peppers from carolina but they really like suggs cuz hes younger just wanted to know what you think n is that worth suggs if he wont sign our deal.

[McBoller]

NOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooo

[lgcs27288]

First round draft pick and Crabtree

[Ravenskid2085]

It's Anita Marks. Not Very Legit.

[Tyler]

I would do it if we got Patrick Willis in Return. He would then bring another great name to 52 after ray left.

[Ravens52]

[quote name='lgcs27288' post='189738' date='May 4 2009, 04:22 PM']First round draft pick and Crabtree [/quote]

Make it Patrick Willis, first rounder, and Crabtree. Then we're talkin

[jezzy]

it might have some merrit cuz sizzle aint budging of the kinda money he wants which wuold leave us no money for nagata n others so if this is the case i say we trade him but not for just the 1st round pick maybe crabtree or vernon davis or additional picks

[20ReedsAll]

From a business standpoint, do it...

Suggs is like my third favorite player, but for a first rounder, why not? Besides, I don't see him resigning with us again next year, so why not get something out of him now. We could have McClain or Barnes start in his place, and Gooden start in Scott's vacant position at 2nd MLB. Our run defense will fall off, but we would still be top 10 against the run.

We could use the 1st round pick next year (San Fran isn't getting anywhere, so it could be a top 15 pick).

Its a good business move...

[Mishel]

this is all speculation at this point...it was just being discussed on Scott & Anita.

[Mishel]

[quote name='Ravenskid2085' post='189739' date='May 4 2009, 04:22 PM']It's Anita Marks. Not Very Legit.[/quote]

Anita was reading/stating it as a rumor from online, its been on the net making the rounds for a few days.

[lgcs27288]

[quote name='20ReedsAll' post='189746' date='May 4 2009, 04:37 PM']From a business standpoint, do it...

Suggs is like my third favorite player, but for a first rounder, why not? Besides, I don't see him resigning with us again next year, so why not get something out of him now. We could have McClain or Barnes start in his place, and Gooden start in Scott's vacant position at 2nd MLB. Our run defense will fall off, but we would still be top 10 against the run.

We could use the 1st round pick next year (San Fran isn't getting anywhere, so it could be a top 15 pick).

Its a good business move...[/quote]

Well it also depends on which first rounder we get aswell. Does anyone know who the other first rounder is from?

[Mishel]

[quote name='lgcs27288' post='189749' date='May 4 2009, 04:41 PM']Well it also depends on which first rounder we get aswell. Does anyone know who the other first rounder is from?[/quote]

I believe the 9ers got it from the Broncos.

[jezzy]

if everyone is sold on kruger being a solid pick i would do it in a heart beat but i dont see that happening i think we should keep suggs unless we get more picks or a player n picks cuz d-line was on e of our weaknesse even though gregg was hurt but with him back we slide nagata over to de n make this move happen which would prob give us a top 10 pick cuz sf still sux with or without suggs so if suggs dont want our money were offering i say pull the trigger so he dont walk for nothing in return

[Alexir]

[quote name='20ReedsAll' post='189746' date='May 4 2009, 04:37 PM']From a business standpoint, do it...

Suggs is like my third favorite player, but for a first rounder, why not? Besides, I don't see him resigning with us again next year, so why not get something out of him now. We could have McClain or Barnes start in his place, and Gooden start in Scott's vacant position at 2nd MLB. Our run defense will fall off, but we would still be top 10 against the run.

We could use the 1st round pick next year (San Fran isn't getting anywhere, so it could be a top 15 pick).

Its a good business move...[/quote]

I agree. Suggs is a great player, and I love the dude as a person. But we cant keep tagging him and if we cant get a deal soon we are screwed. The only thing we will have is a 3rd round comp for the 2011 draft.

Lets try and get the deal done but if its a no go by training camp, just send him packing. We got guys who can step up.

[theFRANCHISE]

The only reason this makes sense is because Mike Singletary is the 49ers head coach, and coached Terrell Suggs during his time in Baltimore as the linebackers coach from 2003-2004 (Suggs' first two seasons). Singletary knows linebackers, and that defense front seven would be unstoppable on the strength of Patrick Willis, Manny Lawson, and Takeo Spikes alone, along with Justin Smith at DE. Terrell Suggs as the hybrid 'backer/end would just be the icing on the cake.

[flynismo]

This isnt going to happen. If we were going to trade Sizzle, he would be in Arizona right now and Boldin would be here.

[jezzy]

[quote name='flynismo' post='189758' date='May 4 2009, 03:52 PM']This isnt going to happen. If we were going to trade Sizzle, he would be in Arizona right now and Boldin would be here.[/quote]
thats not true cuz arizona dont want to break the bank on boldin why would they break the bank on suggs n the same for us if we want to tie that much money up we would sign suggs so the boldin thing is def dead now