Madden 10 Ratings Update

[slugz1]

[quote name='20ReedsAll' post='198411' date='Jun 9 2009, 04:49 PM']Does anyone have a link? Where are people pulling these Ravens' ratings from?[/quote]
pastapadre.com he will answer any questions about what player ratings u want most ppl askd for the ravens i askd for fabain and mcgahee

[#1 D]

[quote name='slugz1' post='198431' date='Jun 9 2009, 05:40 PM']pastapadre.com he will answer any questions about what player ratings u want most ppl askd for the ravens i askd for fabain and mcgahee[/quote]

oh wow nice link...the videos in the corner look pretty nice, too.

[slugz1]

[quote name='#1 D' post='198470' date='Jun 9 2009, 08:36 PM']oh wow nice link...the videos in the corner look pretty nice, too.[/quote]
glad to be of help.

[Canes21]

the stretched out ratings kinda suck but at least they will be able to improve as the season goes on. my only complaint is foxworth being rated higher then fabian when fabian started more games and played better.

[McBurks]

I love this new rating system,but they need to make franchise mode more realistic.Why would the Broncos draft a QB in the first round when they have Jay Cutler?!(My Madden experience.)

[#1 D]

[quote name='Canes21' post='198632' date='Jun 10 2009, 05:50 PM']the stretched out ratings kinda suck but at least they will be able to improve as the season goes on. my only complaint is foxworth being rated higher then fabian when fabian started more games and played better.[/quote]

lol i guess they're trying to rate based on potential, idk why they did that though...but ur right, hopefully they can analyze and update more players than last year.

[Sizzle]

[quote name='scotchtape622' post='195736' date='May 28 2009, 07:38 PM']I'm not saying he is a horrible QB. He is really good in clutch, but if his defense wasn't so great, clutch would be too late.[/quote]
I gotta say i like that saying "if his defense wasn't so great, clutch would be too late."

[scotchtape622]

lol

[Reddawn36]

[quote name='griever' post='188997' date='May 1 2009, 08:19 PM']how so?

[b]i think the chargers have been one and done since rivers came to the team[/b]

McNabb chokes in the big games, and if he brings them back from behind, he cant finish the job

Manning is too inconsistent and squandered home field away this year

Romo has been one and done since hes been on the cowboys, and is always sure to choke in big games

Big ben has 50+ wins in his five years, went 13-0 as a rookie, youngest QB to win the SB, part of the reason they beat the ravens 3 times this past year, and had the game winning SB drive

anything else[/quote]


you lost all accountability after that first statement..... 06... Drew Brees last year playing as starter for chargers... one and done in play offs
07, rivers first year, they go head to head, and compete with New England in the AFC championship game.... he played injured in that game
08... chargers beat colts, than lose to eventual superbowl winners pittsburgh steelers

i fail to see the one and done you are talking about in the 2 years rivers has started for them

to be honest if i had to choose between rivers and big ben to play QB for my team, i'd choose rivers.
and fyi, he didn't win their superbowl(s) their defense did

don't get me wrong, he's pretty clutch.. but sometimes being clutch isn't good enough

[slugz1]

they playd the ravens [url="http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/06/12/titans-avenge-2008-playoff-loss-to-ravens-in-35-21-victory.aspx"]http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/200...21-victory.aspx[/url]

[Ravenskid2085]

[quote name='slugz1' post='198231' date='Jun 8 2009, 06:20 PM']gooden 63

Derrick Mason 88
Willis mcgahee 83
Dawan Landry 71
Todd Heap 84
Trevor Pryce 83
Kelly Gregg 77
Chris Carr 65
Samari Rolle 75
Jarret Johnson 79
Troy Smith 59
L.J. Smith 77[/quote]

Good Lord, Troy Smiths a 59?
I would at least put him in the 60s

[slugz1]

QB J. Flacco 81
QB T. Smith 59 82 86
QB J. Beck 48

RB W. McGahee 83 82 86
RB R. Rice 78 85 90
RB C. Peerman 68 93 86

FB L. McClain 92 81 84

WR D. Mason 88 85 90
WR M. Clayton 77 86 92
WR D. Williams 66 82 85
WR M. Smith 49 82 84
WR Y. Figurs 39 95 97

TE T. Heap 84 82 84
TE L.J. Smith 77 72 77
TE Q. Sypniewski 65 70 80

OL M. Birk 88
OL B. Grubbs 84
OL W. Anderson 82
OL Jared Gaither 79
OL C. Chester 78
OL M. Oher 77
OL M. Yanda 77
OL A. Terry 72
OL D. Hale 69
OL O. Cousins 68
OL T. Stallings 62

DL H. Ngata 90
DL T. Pryce 83
DL K. Gregg 77
DL J. Bannan 74
DL D. Edwards 71
DL B. McKinney 65
DL L. Divens 64

LB R. Lewis 97 83 86
LB T. Suggs 90 83 95
LB J. Johnson 79 69 82
LB P. Kruger 71 73 77
LB A. Barnes 70 86 92
LB T. Gooden 65 82 90
LB J. McClain 63 80 82
LB B. Ayanbadejo 63 71 77
LB P. Burgess 50 72 79

CB D. Foxworth 82 93 95
CB F. Washington 77 98 97
CB S. Rolle 75 85 87
CB L. Webb 71 93 94
CB C. Carr 65 91 94
CB F. Walker 49 80 86

S E. Reed 99 93 94
S D. Landry 71 78 81
S T. Zbikowski 63 85 87
S H. Nakamura 62 84 87

K S. Hauschka 59

P S. Koch 86
Ovr Spd Acc

[Ed_Reed_Pick_Six]

Ed Reed should be 101!

[ChiseBack(CB)]

[quote name='slugz1' post='199703' date='Jun 15 2009, 01:54 PM']OVR Speed Acceleration
QB T. Smith 59 82 86
CB F. Walker 49 80 86[/quote]
Those two are the only ones I have problems with.

I wouldn't have such an issue with Troy Smith being so low if the 09 QB rookie class wasn't rated so high

Pat White 65 - 2nd Rounder
Nate Davis 64 - 5th Rounder
Curtis Painter 62 - 6th Rounder
Rhett Bomar 62 - 5th Rounder
Tom Brandstater 60 - 6th Rounder
Stephen McGee - 59 - 4th Rounder
Troy Smith - 59 - 5th Rounder

[Ed_Reed_Pick_Six]

Ouch, Frank Walker got murdered...

[BloodRaven]

Walker is pretty inconsistent. I hate some of those linemen ratings though,

[Ed_Reed_Pick_Six]

[quote name='BloodRaven' post='199788' date='Jun 15 2009, 11:04 PM']Walker is pretty inconsistent. I hate some of those linemen ratings though,[/quote]
They're fairly mediocre.

[#1 D]

[quote name='Ed_Reed_Pick_Six' post='199778' date='Jun 15 2009, 06:11 AM']Ouch, Frank Walker got murdered...[/quote]

haha no kiddin'. I don't exactly know how they're rating players this year, but its a whole lot different to me than last year's ratings, 2009, because almost everybody's ratings were alot higher the previous year. i guess they're trying to separate the talented players from the not-so-talented ones a bit more, this year.

[berad]

[quote name='slugz1' post='199510' date='Jun 13 2009, 10:58 PM']they playd the ravens [url="http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/2009/06/12/titans-avenge-2008-playoff-loss-to-ravens-in-35-21-victory.aspx"]http://insideblog.easports.com/archive/200...21-victory.aspx[/url][/quote]

Jeff Fisher looks like he has down-syndrome hahah

[52Kia Kaha92]

i like the new strecthed ratings but Jared Gaither, Kelly Gregg, Dawan Landry and Frank Walker all need to be higher

I would say

Gaither - 84
Gregg - 87
Landry - 83
Walker - 68

[Ed_Reed_Pick_Six]

Landry is low coz he missed a lot of games... I would imagine?

[Bullrush]

What's Flacco's throwpower and accuracy? His throwpower was 97 i believe.

[Ed_Reed_Pick_Six]

[quote name='Bullrush' post='200157' date='Jun 17 2009, 12:04 AM']What's Flacco's throwpower and accuracy? His throwpower was 97 i believe.[/quote]
That has to be top 2 or 3?

[Bullrush]

Yeah last year only JaMarcus Russell had a bigger arm (98) but they probably lowered his rating again this year. I noticed last year when the updates came out they downgraded Russell to a 97 or a 96. So Flacco might have the biggest arm in Madden right now.

[20ReedsAll]

Im pretty sure Russel will have the strongest arm again. Flacco should have the second best. I'd give Russel 99 throw power, and Flacco 98.

[ChiseBack(CB)]

Anyone see that Kyle Boller was a 51?

[BloodRaven]

[quote name='ChiseBack(CB)' post='200537' date='Jun 16 2009, 08:37 PM']Anyone see that Kyle Boller was a 51?[/quote]

That sounds about right.

[20ReedsAll]

EA has asked many of the sites that have posted the ratings to take them down. This either means that they don't want people to know about the ratings yet, or that they may change a few around. Hopefully, they change a few around (for the better).

[wayne]

[quote name='20ReedsAll' post='201013' date='Jun 17 2009, 07:50 PM']EA has asked many of the sites that have posted the ratings to take them down. This either means that they don't want people to know about the ratings yet, or that they may change a few around. Hopefully, they change a few around (for the better).[/quote]

Where did you hear this from, can I get a link to you hearing that EA doesn't want the Ratings to be posted, thanks!

[Bullrush]

Pastapadre (pastapadre.com) said it on his website. He released all the ratings and a few hours later or a day later EA asked him to remove the ratings again. EA is currently releasing the ratings on their own website (one team per day) so they want everybody to keep checking their website for the next few weeks/months instead of just getting all the ratings at once from somebody else.