The Ravens Requested No Prime-time Game In Pitts
#21
Posted 20 March 2009 - 03:42 PM
And seriously, a loss to start the season 0-1 is demoralizing, even though it's early. It especially doesn't help the psyche of the younger players, to play in such a hostile environment with all odds against them, and to come out with a loss. On the flip side, it would, of course, be a huge boost to have a repeat of the Dallas game last season and beat the Steelers at home on one of the biggest nights in team history -- but lightning doesn't always strike twice in that regard.
It's a nice idea, to upset the defending champs at home in Week 1, but I'd rather start the season healthy, if you know what I mean. EVERY Ravens-Steelers game has ended with a player getting hurt on both teams, and we don't need a key starter going down so early.
Happily Eating Crow About Tim Tebow Since January 8, 2012!
September 7th, 2008 -- The Joe Flacco Era Begins

"Character overcomes adversity because you've got hearts this big.
Was it perfect? No! Was it pretty? No! But it was us!!" -- John Harbaugh
#22
Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:04 PM
Edited by neepo13, 20 March 2009 - 04:05 PM.
#23
Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:09 PM
Ravenskid2085, on Mar 20 2009, 04:22 PM, said:
We've played prime time in your house every year.
Its time you come to our house.
Btw I swear it seems like everytime i see Pittsburgh it seems like there at home, anybody else think that too?
Wasn't the game in B-More this year prime-time?

Zhamtao, on 03 September 2009 - 07:38 PM, said:
#25
Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:14 PM
neepo13, on Mar 20 2009, 05:13 PM, said:
I thought I remembered it being at night but that's because it was bumped to 4pm. No, you're right: Night games are after 8:30 pm.

Zhamtao, on 03 September 2009 - 07:38 PM, said:
#26
Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:21 PM
#27
Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:23 PM
edreedfromtheu, on Mar 20 2009, 05:21 PM, said:
That's because God hates the Ravens.

Zhamtao, on 03 September 2009 - 07:38 PM, said:
#30
Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:52 PM
edreedfromtheu, on Mar 20 2009, 05:21 PM, said:
Well there was that playclock miracle against the Titans.
I agree with you though: if the defending champs want to play us, then we'll probably have no choice. However, don't forget that the Steelers know they are going to get hurt playing us; they might not want to start the season out with injuries either.
#31
Posted 20 March 2009 - 05:02 PM
Edited by SupaBwandin, 20 March 2009 - 05:16 PM.

Troy Smith / Demetrius Williams / Antwan Barnes / Paul Kruger / Eron Riley Supporter!
#32
Posted 20 March 2009 - 05:31 PM
Rain
The rain is evil from Heinz Stadium. Sure it helps teams sometimes but it gives the Steelers a TD on defense once every time it rains. It never ceases to amaze me how many times the rain would help any team just a little but when its the Steelers turn it gives them key stuff like say a defensive TD for instance.
May it never rain at Heinz Stadium ever again... (during the Ravens games only)
#33
Posted 20 March 2009 - 06:03 PM
theFRANCHISE, on Mar 20 2009, 04:42 PM, said:
I'm not scared of the "Super Bowl champions," it's just that the Steelers match up with our team all too well. Our teams are carbon copies of each other, and at least right now, Ben is better than Flacco, especially in the deciding moments of the game. Things will even up this year, but not by week one.
Honestly though, when was the last time Pittsburgh came to our house on Sunday/Monday/Saturday/Thursday night?
Going on the road is one thing, but playing on an unkempt field against a team that matches up too well is another.
Irrespective of the fact that it makes sense, they're our rival, and we're backing down, which is still embarrassing.
#34
Posted 20 March 2009 - 06:04 PM
edreedfromtheu, on Mar 20 2009, 05:27 PM, said:
I'd say we've gotten our fair share of lucky breaks.
Anyway, why would the NFL ever agree to this? The Ravens - Steelers would probably draw more viewers than pretty much any other opponent.
Edited by Ravnet, 20 March 2009 - 06:16 PM.
#35
Posted 20 March 2009 - 06:43 PM
Ravnet, on Mar 20 2009, 07:04 PM, said:
Agreed. At least, the game would draw more viewers than any other opponent that the team could conceivably play at home in their slate of '09 opponents. If the NFL had its way, Steelers-Cowboys would be this year's Week 1 season opener because of their huge fanbases -- but obviously, can't happen this year.
So, looking at their home opponents, if the Ravens aren't play the Steelers in Week 1, then the only "money" games I see are the Chargers or Titans. A divisional game with the Bengals or Browns could easily turn into a snoozefest if those two teams are anything like they were last season. And an interconference game with either the Packers or Vikings wouldn't really be that easy to promote, given how little recent history they have with the Steelers.
I say the Steelers get a rematch with the Titans in Week 1, only because of the towel-stomping incident from last season.
Happily Eating Crow About Tim Tebow Since January 8, 2012!
September 7th, 2008 -- The Joe Flacco Era Begins

"Character overcomes adversity because you've got hearts this big.
Was it perfect? No! Was it pretty? No! But it was us!!" -- John Harbaugh
#36
Posted 20 March 2009 - 07:47 PM
#38
Posted 20 March 2009 - 08:31 PM
#40
Posted 20 March 2009 - 08:51 PM
Think about it, we play the Steelers when their 'cold', the best time to play them at Heinz Field and if we do win we begin the season top of the division and with great confidence!!!
If we do lose we can basically move on because we are not expected to win that game anyway!!!! (who expects us to win at Heinz Field?)
I know momentum is a big thing but if we have the opportunity to start the season with Pittsburgh on the back foot or worst case scenario lose a game we're expected to lose anyway then its a no brainer for me.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

This topic is locked












Log In To The Flock
Enter your member name and password to sign in.

Forget your password?' Want to sign up?