2017 Forum Mock: Discussion Thread

[arnie_uk]

That's ruined my day

[allblackraven]

19 minutes ago, ArsenalRaven666 said:

Like they have a better QB situation ....

At least there's no QB to tag

[allblackraven]

15 minutes ago, regz1997 said:

Did Pernell McPhee really go for A.J. McCarron and a fifth?

Yes and saved 6.5 stars in the process

[ludy51]

18 minutes ago, regz1997 said:

Did Pernell McPhee really go for A.J. McCarron and a fifth?

Seriously. And I really need a pass rusher too

[regz1997]

3 minutes ago, allblackraven said:

Yes and saved 6.5 stars in the process

He's been such an effective pass rusher and OLB since going to Chicago though. I think he's worth the money personally

[regz1997]

2 minutes ago, ludy51 said:

Seriously. And I really need a pass rusher too

Yeah that woulda been a hell of a deal

[ArsenalRaven666]

3 minutes ago, regz1997 said:

He's been such an effective pass rusher and OLB since going to Chicago though. I think he's worth the money personally

In my mind Mcphee would be worth a 4th and McCarron a 5th at best

[ludy51]

43 minutes ago, arnie_uk said:

That's ruined my day

Yeah no way is Cousins worth that much.

It's not like he's a pass rusher or something.

[arnie_uk]

Just now, ludy51 said:

Yeah no way is Cousins worth that much.

It's not like he's a pass rusher or something.

He'd go for more on the free agency met.  Cleveland would love to have him

[ArsenalRaven666]

2 minutes ago, arnie_uk said:

He'd go for more on the free agency met.  Cleveland would love to have him

Under new management The Cleveland Browns have a cunning plan !!!

[ludy51]

19 minutes ago, ArsenalRaven666 said:

Under new management The Cleveland Browns have a cunning plan !!!

You know what they say about best laid plans....

[ArsenalRaven666]

3 minutes ago, ludy51 said:

You know what they say about best laid plans....

never have a plan

[allblackraven]

59 minutes ago, regz1997 said:

He's been such an effective pass rusher and OLB since going to Chicago though. I think he's worth the money personally

Misses lot of time though and there's 3 solid OLBs still on the roster.

[Giants56Ravens52]

6 hours ago, -Truth- said:

@Giants56Ravens52 Just wanted to give the heads up, but your SoF hasn't been filled out, so the trade can't be confirmed until that's been done and the depth chart has been posted and updated.

I filled out the SoF, and am going to update it for ERFAs now too.

I included the ERFAs and RFAs n my depth chart for now. Is that okay? I'll update it after their respective periods of course, it just made it easier for me to keep track of who I have access to. 

[-Truth-]

3 minutes ago, Giants56Ravens52 said:

I filled out the SoF, and am going to update it for ERFAs now too.

I included the ERFAs and RFAs n my depth chart for now. Is that okay? I'll update it after their respective periods of course, it just made it easier for me to keep track of who I have access to. 

That makes sense. Appreciate you reaching out for the questions. I'm almost positive that the ERFAs can't be contested, so no worries there. Same for the RFAs as long as they're updated if you lose anyone.

[allblackraven]

9 minutes ago, Giants56Ravens52 said:

I filled out the SoF, and am going to update it for ERFAs now too.

I included the ERFAs and RFAs n my depth chart for now. Is that okay? I'll update it after their respective periods of course, it just made it easier for me to keep track of who I have access to. 

 

4 minutes ago, -Truth- said:

That makes sense. Appreciate you reaching out for the questions. I'm almost positive that the ERFAs can't be contested, so no worries there. Same for the RFAs as long as they're updated if you lose anyone.

RFAs and tags should not be reflected in depth charts before the bidding for tendered players is complete.

[Giants56Ravens52]

3 minutes ago, -Truth- said:

That makes sense. Appreciate you reaching out for the questions. I'm almost positive that the ERFAs can't be contested, so no worries there. Same for the RFAs as long as they're updated if you lose anyone.

Thanks.

Finished updating for ERFAs on the SoF. I should be good to go. I also updated it for the Graham trade with Ravensfanmania, and added in my Franchise tag since that can't be contested either if that's alright. 

[Giants56Ravens52]

1 minute ago, allblackraven said:

 

RFAs and tags should not be reflected in depth charts before the bidding for tendered players is complete.

I get where you are coming from, but...

If it's a franchise tag it wouldn't matter since it can't be contested, right? Same with ERFAs.

I have it in parentheses that the RFAs are RFAs, and they aren't included in my cap as of now. I would really much rather keep them there on the depth chart since it's an easier way to keep track. Otherwise the names aren't anywhere of note, and if an irl signing happens between now and our period opening up I could easily miss them. 

 

[JO_75]

In terms of tendering, even if we didn't draft the player the original round tender sticks to whatever round he was drafted in by any team correct? So if I original round tender someone who was drafted by one team but cut then that original round still stands?

[arnie_uk]

Just now, JO_75 said:

In terms of tendering, even if we didn't draft the player the original round tender sticks to whatever round he was drafted in by any team correct? So if I original round tender someone who was drafted by one team but cut then that original round still stands?

Yes

[rmw10]

3 minutes ago, JO_75 said:

In terms of tendering, even if we didn't draft the player the original round tender sticks to whatever round he was drafted in by any team correct? So if I original round tender someone who was drafted by one team but cut then that original round still stands?

Correct.

[JO_75]

4 minutes ago, arnie_uk said:

Yes

 

1 minute ago, rmw10 said:

Correct.

If only I had studied the Ravens RFAs and not just the UFAs I wouldn't have picked them. This is some tough decisions on who to tender.

[arnie_uk]

4 minutes ago, JO_75 said:

 

If only I had studied the Ravens RFAs and not just the UFAs I wouldn't have picked them. This is some tough decisions on who to tender.

I'll take Joe flaccos cap hit of you... or yandas or weddles or jimmys

[RavensFanMania]

3 hours ago, regz1997 said:

He's been such an effective pass rusher and OLB since going to Chicago though. I think he's worth the money personally

Agree

3 hours ago, arnie_uk said:

He'd go for more on the free agency met.  Cleveland would love to have him

Agree, Cleveland would love him, but RG3 would not.

[allblackraven]

2 hours ago, Giants56Ravens52 said:

I get where you are coming from, but...

If it's a franchise tag it wouldn't matter since it can't be contested, right? Same with ERFAs.

I have it in parentheses that the RFAs are RFAs, and they aren't included in my cap as of now. I would really much rather keep them there on the depth chart since it's an easier way to keep track. Otherwise the names aren't anywhere of note, and if an irl signing happens between now and our period opening up I could easily miss them. 

 

All good

[rmw10]

@ravensnick it will be 13 stars for Berry since he was tagged last year too.

[ravensnick]

14 minutes ago, rmw10 said:

@ravensnick it will be 13 stars for Berry since he was tagged last year too.

K

[rmw10]

The rules thread has been updated, and a new post highlights the changes and dates of importance.

[LosT_in_TranSlatioN]

6 hours ago, RavensFanMania said:

@LosT_in_TranSlatioN wishes you did as well

...........

 

@arnie_uk Thanks a lot.

 

[ArsenalRaven666]

Im majorly done.

On a coarse for work next week and will have zero time for free agency trades, going to have to nail the draft lol