Realistically, do the Ravens have a shot at representing the AFC in the Super Bowl?

[Steve0x]

If they don't make it,,Then Dean Pees will be fired

[K-Dog]

3 hours ago, Steve0x said:

If they don't make it,,Then Dean Pees will be fired

Zero chance of that.

[VermontRaven]

49 minutes ago, K-Dog said:

Zero chance of that.

Yeah, I agree. You don't fire the coordinator of a #1 defense!

[Purple_City39]

5 hours ago, Steve0x said:

If they don't make it,,Then Dean Pees will be fired

What's the logic behind this?  Top 5 in yards, rush yards, and points allowed.  How is he a candidate to be fired??  

[Cillmatic]

5 hours ago, Steve0x said:

If they don't make it,,Then Dean Pees will be fired

Pees is safe for at least 3 seasons, bud.

[K-Dog]

21 minutes ago, Purple_City39 said:

What's the logic behind this?  

There isn't any.

[-Truth-]

On 12/6/2016 at 6:19 PM, Steve0x said:

Look how the Raiders turn things around. They spend! 

We'll bypass the fact that heir turnaround was largely due to the fact that they brought in Khalil Mack, Derek Carr and Co. via the draft. Obviously the spending spree reaped its benefits. That being said, the part that is somehow lost in the analogy above is the only detail that is required to have in order to spend. Money. The Raiders came into the most recent offseason with $74 million in cap space, the largest number in the entire NFL. We came in with $3.5 million. And you're saying that we should've been emulating the budget plan of a team that had literally over 2,100% of available funds that we did, a number that we likely won't flirt with in years if not decades? Are you quite certain that the Raiders are an accurate comparison for this scenario? I'm not entirely sure.

Edited December 8, 2016 by -Truth-