[News] Eisenberg: 6 Thoughts From Ravens' Minicamp

[TheConquerorWorm]

  12 hours ago, TheConquerorWorm said:

It was pretty apparent from anyone looking at game tape that he wasn't ready for the NFL. Ole Miss ran a spread option offense where o-linemen ONLY have to worry about the guy directly in front of them - there was NO protection schemes, no calls, etc. Yes, he has off the chart measurables but so did JaMarcus Russell.

Right now, he's currently backing up LG Thomas (PFF worst rated O-Lineman last year)

http://dailydolphin.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2016/06/16/dolphins-rookie-laremy-tunsil-making-smooth-transition-to-guard/

 

We'd like you to revisit this post in week 6.

If you are saying Stanley is better than Tunsil and will outperform him this year, say it plain.  No equivocation.

I am stating our Front Office erred again and Stanley was a now common mistake and passing on Tunsil was a major Faux Pas. An inexcusable Faux Pas and when the results come in it should be a fatal Faux Pas.  A team CANNOT have a superior draft position and then select an inferior player. Not at Selection 6.  That cannot and will not stand without correction.  

Well, the Ravens cut their starting LT and are inserting Stanley in from Day 1. Tunsil is not even competing to be the back-up LT - he's competing to be the back-up LG & currently LOSING TO THE WORST G IN THE NFL.

I still have yet to see anyone post actual facts about why you think Tunsil is better. What did you see on the coach's game tape? Complex protection schemes? - no, Ole Miss doesn't run them. Ability to recognize blitz packages? - no, Ole Miss doesn't change blocking assignments. Adapting to different play calls? - no, Ole Miss often ran the same play 4-5 times in a row. Better character issues? no, smoked weed in high school, took money in college, smoked fake weed in college and let his teammate fall out a window, beat up his step dad, etc, etc. Bigger size? No. Longer Arms? No. Bigger hands? No. Better Punch? No. Play and start every game in any one of his college seasons? No. Played against top pass rushers? No, (Stanley dominated Shaq Lawson & Joey Bosa). I guess you think having better bench press numbers makes you a better player.

[harfordravenfan]

10 minutes ago, TheConquerorWorm said:

Well, the Ravens cut their starting LT and are inserting Stanley in from Day 1. Tunsil is not even competing to be the back-up LT - he's competing to be the back-up LG & currently LOSING TO THE WORST G IN THE NFL.

I still have yet to see anyone post actual facts about why you think Tunsil is better. What did you see on the coach's game tape? Complex protection schemes? - no, Ole Miss doesn't run them. Ability to recognize blitz packages? - no, Ole Miss doesn't change blocking assignments. Adapting to different play calls? - no, Ole Miss often ran the same play 4-5 times in a row. Better character issues? no, smoked weed in high school, took money in college, smoked fake weed in college and let his teammate fall out a window, beat up his step dad, etc, etc. Bigger size? No. Longer Arms? No. Bigger hands? No. Better Punch? No. Play and start every game in any one of his college seasons? No. Played against top pass rushers? No, (Stanley dominated Shaq Lawson & Joey Bosa). I guess you think having better bench press numbers makes you a better player.

At least for now... I'd call that

Checkmate 

Well done sir

[BmoreB]

  2 hours ago, Danny D said:

  12 hours ago, TheConquerorWorm said:

It was pretty apparent from anyone looking at game tape that he wasn't ready for the NFL. Ole Miss ran a spread option offense where o-linemen ONLY have to worry about the guy directly in front of them - there was NO protection schemes, no calls, etc. Yes, he has off the chart measurables but so did JaMarcus Russell.

Right now, he's currently backing up LG Thomas (PFF worst rated O-Lineman last year)

http://dailydolphin.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2016/06/16/dolphins-rookie-laremy-tunsil-making-smooth-transition-to-guard/

 

We'd like you to revisit this post in week 6.

If you are saying Stanley is better than Tunsil and will outperform him this year, say it plain.  No equivocation.

I am stating our Front Office erred again and Stanley was a now common mistake and passing on Tunsil was a major Faux Pas. An inexcusable Faux Pas and when the results come in it should be a fatal Faux Pas.  A team CANNOT have a superior draft position and then select an inferior player. Not at Selection 6.  That cannot and will not stand without correction.  

Well, the Ravens cut their starting LT and are inserting Stanley in from Day 1. Tunsil is not even competing to be the back-up LT - he's competing to be the back-up LG & currently LOSING TO THE WORST G IN THE NFL.

I still have yet to see anyone post actual facts about why you think Tunsil is better. What did you see on the coach's game tape? Complex protection schemes? - no, Ole Miss doesn't run them. Ability to recognize blitz packages? - no, Ole Miss doesn't change blocking assignments. Adapting to different play calls? - no, Ole Miss often ran the same play 4-5 times in a row. Better character issues? no, smoked weed in high school, took money in college, smoked fake weed in college and let his teammate fall out a window, beat up his step dad, etc, etc. Bigger size? No. Longer Arms? No. Bigger hands? No. Better Punch? No. Play and start every game in any one of his college seasons? No. Played against top pass rushers? No, (Stanley dominated Shaq Lawson & Joey Bosa). I guess you think having better bench press numbers makes you a better player.

I could be wrong but I'm thinking you like that we selected Stanley over Tunsil ? Or, am I reading too deeply into things ? lol

[ravensnj]

I see Urschel becoming our future center.

[Space11jams]

  On 6/19/2016 at 1:59 AM, TheConquerorWorm said:

It was pretty apparent from anyone looking at game tape that he wasn't ready for the NFL. Ole Miss ran a spread option offense where o-linemen ONLY have to worry about the guy directly in front of them - there was NO protection schemes, no calls, etc. Yes, he has off the chart measurables but so did JaMarcus Russell.

Right now, he's currently backing up LG Thomas (PFF worst rated O-Lineman last year)

http://dailydolphin.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2016/06/16/dolphins-rookie-laremy-tunsil-making-smooth-transition-to-guard/

 

We'd like you to revisit this post in week 6.

If you are saying Stanley is better than Tunsil and will outperform him this year, say it plain.  No equivocation.

I am stating our Front Office erred again and Stanley was a now common mistake and passing on Tunsil was a major Faux Pas. An inexcusable Faux Pas and when the results come in it should be a fatal Faux Pas.  A team CANNOT have a superior draft position and then select an inferior player. Not at Selection 6.  That cannot and will not stand without correction.  

What makes you think he's going to be better than Stanley when Stanley is better equip for the NFL? I fail to see the logic in that. Tunsil isn't even competing for the position he was drafted for. He's backing up a BUM lmao. Stanley on the other hand was a highlight in our camp thus far and I'm quite sure they threw everything they possibly could at him. JO is a teddy bear too. Until he steps on the field. Not saying Stanley is the next JO but the guy has MAD talent and ability to be an All Pro, Pro Bowl, SB Winning LT. Don't sleep.....that's all i'm saying....

[Space11jams]

  On 6/19/2016 at 0:16 PM, Danny D said:

  On 6/19/2016 at 1:59 AM, TheConquerorWorm said:

It was pretty apparent from anyone looking at game tape that he wasn't ready for the NFL. Ole Miss ran a spread option offense where o-linemen ONLY have to worry about the guy directly in front of them - there was NO protection schemes, no calls, etc. Yes, he has off the chart measurables but so did JaMarcus Russell.

Right now, he's currently backing up LG Thomas (PFF worst rated O-Lineman last year)

http://dailydolphin.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2016/06/16/dolphins-rookie-laremy-tunsil-making-smooth-transition-to-guard/

 

We'd like you to revisit this post in week 6.

If you are saying Stanley is better than Tunsil and will outperform him this year, say it plain.  No equivocation.

I am stating our Front Office erred again and Stanley was a now common mistake and passing on Tunsil was a major Faux Pas. An inexcusable Faux Pas and when the results come in it should be a fatal Faux Pas.  A team CANNOT have a superior draft position and then select an inferior player. Not at Selection 6.  That cannot and will not stand without correction.  

Well, the Ravens cut their starting LT and are inserting Stanley in from Day 1. Tunsil is not even competing to be the back-up LT - he's competing to be the back-up LG & currently LOSING TO THE WORST G IN THE NFL.

I still have yet to see anyone post actual facts about why you think Tunsil is better. What did you see on the coach's game tape? Complex protection schemes? - no, Ole Miss doesn't run them. Ability to recognize blitz packages? - no, Ole Miss doesn't change blocking assignments. Adapting to different play calls? - no, Ole Miss often ran the same play 4-5 times in a row. Better character issues? no, smoked weed in high school, took money in college, smoked fake weed in college and let his teammate fall out a window, beat up his step dad, etc, etc. Bigger size? No. Longer Arms? No. Bigger hands? No. Better Punch? No. Play and start every game in any one of his college seasons? No. Played against top pass rushers? No, (Stanley dominated Shaq Lawson & Joey Bosa). I guess you think having better bench press numbers makes you a better player.

Word Up!