Kyle Juszczyk

[Edgar]

If Kyle was Injured, who would take over at fullback? Most likely we go without and use a tight end like Maxx in more of an occasional H-Back role. Perhaps bring in an extra guard or tackle in the backfield on occasion.

I don't think the offense with a few tweaks, misses a beat. For me, if Waller shows up like I think he will in pre season and it comes down to a decision between Kyle or Waller......I'm taking the younger player with a high ceiling over a fullback.

[Tiznut]

If he's severely injured and ir l'd the Ravens would do what every other team that uses a fb does.  Sign a free agent. 

 

Teams thst hat use a fb only carry one so the what if is no different than it's ever been 

[redrum52]

I don't see the team having any reason to get rid of him unless Trestman feels he's unnecessary in the offense.  I can't remember the last time we didn't keep a FB though.  He's also versatile.

[January J]

We will find a way to keep him. Who else would we dump it off to on the start every single drive? lol

[Bird Dog]

On 6/17/2016 at 3:47 PM, Winchester said:

Juszczyk is a fan favorite but not special. From what I saw his blocking is good not dominant. He is not an electrifying athlete as a receiver. Now if ravens could find a special athlete that can run and catch like a receiving te yet block well out of the back then that would be a fullback to keep around. 

 I think we have better pass catchers and better athletes available to fill this position. Bigger targets for Joe is a big plus for him and us. I love the way the Bengals use their tight end out of the backfield. We could do the same thing with some of ours. Plus we run the ball better without a FB in there. Better play makers makes more sense and will give us more opportunities to score which creates more points. I like Kyle but I think we can be better served with other athletes.