[News] Poll: Who Will Ravens Pick At No. 6?

[respecttheRaven]

Steve Bisciotti expressed his want for a DE.....I think we go Bosa. That is not exactly who I would like them to pick, but I think it's whom we go with. My pick is Bosa.http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000647580/article/steve-bisciotti-ravens-need-to-add-pass-rushers

 

Edited April 28, 2016 by respecttheRaven

[hen826957]

 I picked Elliott as that's who I've been pushing even when he wasn't a popular pick, but what's becoming more apparent is that Dallas might take him first.  This is Mayock's pick, but I'm sure I've also seen it elsewhere.  With Mcfadden gone they could use his versatility and also take pressure off Romo.  Something else Mayock said and I think he might be right about is Jerry Jones is having visions of the Emmit Smith days and wants to bring that era back with Elliott.  Hope I'm wrong.  I really want Zeke.

If that's the case, then Ramsey might slip to the Ravens. You should be glad they take Elliott. Elliott must have to go to the Cowboys for it to make this possible. But l understand your a Zeke fanboy. ?

[hen826957]

  4 hours ago, hen826957 said:

  7 hours ago, verified said:

ive lost all hope on getting jalen ramsey. I thought the cowboys would get a pass rusher and jags would get myles jack, but after these reports that just came out saying myles jacks knee is separating theres no way they pick him over ramsey :( aw well.. another year of watchin our corners get torched because by the time we pick again in the 2nd round all the top 5 corners will be gone. Another year of boring picks

I know what you mean. It sucks. I want Ramsey too. I wish we could trade up with the Chargers to get him but l doubt Ozzie would give up a 3rd Rounder. Ozzie loves his picks. ☹️

Jalen Ramsey is not the end all be all to the Ravens defense. Just like all of you, i would love to get Ramsey, but it't not like if we don't get him then we have no hope or the first round was a waste.

True. ?

[hen826957]

Did anybody see Mike Mayock mock draft? What a terrible mock draft. He has the Ravens trade out of the number 6 to 15 with the Rams that still has Larmey Tunsil, Joey Bosa, Myles Jack, etc on the board. If his mock draft was for real we miss out all those top prospects and leave us to draft wr Josh Doctson. If this happens l will explode. Here's a link to anybody wants to see it http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/mock-drafts/mike-mayock/326209

Edited April 28, 2016 by hen826957

[verified]

bosa is a 4-3 player hes not meant for a 3-4 defense hell be another courntey upshaw, a waste

[n#7]

bosa is a 4-3 player hes not meant for a 3-4 defense hell be another courntey upshaw, a waste

Then they should go to a 4-3.

[ravensnj]

4 hours ago, n#7 said:

Then they should go to a 4-3.

Actually, with our current roster, we are better suited as a 4-3. Further, with the outlaw of the chop block, it might be better to beef up the front line,  as we had it in 2000. Buckner might be our pick.

[usmccharles]

9 hours ago, cbrook1862 said:

You have the second best LB(Jaylon Smith #1) with huge health concerns over the best OT, over the best CB, and over the best pass-rusher. And all of those positions are relatively big needs... interesting.

I don't think you can really say huge health concerns because no one really knows.  We know that Jaylon Smith has issues, its been confirmed.  There are too many reports that say different things to lean one way or another. 

[J.O.14]

Did anybody see Mike Mayock mock draft? What a terrible mock draft. He has the Ravens trade out of the number 6 to 15 with the Rams that still has Larmey Tunsil, Joey Bosa, Myles Jack, etc on the board. If his mock draft was for real we miss out all those top prospects and leave us to draft wr Josh Doctson. If this happens l will explode. Here's a link to anybody wants to see it http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/mock-drafts/mike-mayock/326209

If this happens, the whole fan base would explode. Could the trade happen? Yes. But I don't think we take Josh Doctson. If we trade back to 15, I think we will take a defensive player.

[J.O.14]

The closer we get to the draft, the more I have absolutely no idea who we will pick, or what we will do. I think we could trade down a couple spots, or possibly 9. I think we could stay put and could have 4 different players in play when we pick. I can't wait to find out. My hope is that we land a defensive playmaker, but if we take Tunsil, it would be hard to be upset about it.

[usmccharles]

4 minutes ago, J.O.14 said:

The closer we get to the draft, the more I have absolutely no idea who we will pick, or what we will do. I think we could trade down a couple spots, or possibly 9. I think we could stay put and could have 4 different players in play when we pick. I can't wait to find out. My hope is that we land a defensive playmaker, but if we take Tunsil, it would be hard to be upset about it.

Im the same way.  I want us to go defense but Tunsil/Stanley could be huge for us.  Bosa, Buckner, Jack, Stanley, Tunsil, Lawson, Floyd I would be just fine with. I don think I forgot anyone....

[bioLarzen]

Haha, I see Mayock has us trade down with the Titans to #15, missing out on every single one of the big names, picking Doctson (and also picking up the Titan's 2nd round pick (#32)). If anything like that happens, I guess the Baltimore police will have to protect Ozzie's home for the Ravens Nation will riot :D

[IceDevilHH81]

37 minutes ago, bioLarzen said:

Haha, I see Mayock has us trade down with the Titans to #15, missing out on every single one of the big names, picking Doctson (and also picking up the Titan's 2nd round pick (#32)). If anything like that happens, I guess the Baltimore police will have to protect Ozzie's home for the Ravens Nation will riot

I would be ok with a trade if Tunsil, Buckner or Ramsey aren`t there!

Bosa has the risk of being the most overrated prospect in the Draft. Even Scouts think he has reached his potential.

I am really concerned about Jacks knee! We could get in the same situation we had last year with our 1^st  pick! And I don`t want a player who may only play a short time!

Elliot may be a problem in the locker if he isn`t happy! I don`t think he fits us! Don`t like how he called out his coaches after the Michigan St. game! And not only that tweet…

[potomacpitbulls]

This year is the perfect year to trade with the Titans at 15. The Titans have three 2nd round picks, and If the Ravens get their 33nd pick that would be huge.

#15- Shaq Lawson DL
#33- Noah Spence DL
#36- Mackensie Alexander CB
#70- Braxton Miller WR
#104- Scooby Wright LB
#130- Graham Glasgow OL
#132- Jaylon Smith LB
#134- Bronson Kaufusi DL
#182- Darian Thompson S
#209- Blake Frohnapfel QB (looks like Joe)

[whobilly]

  1 hour ago, J.O.14 said:

The closer we get to the draft, the more I have absolutely no idea who we will pick, or what we will do. I think we could trade down a couple spots, or possibly 9. I think we could stay put and could have 4 different players in play when we pick. I can't wait to find out. My hope is that we land a defensive playmaker, but if we take Tunsil, it would be hard to be upset about it.

Im the same way.  I want us to go defense but Tunsil/Stanley could be huge for us.  Bosa, Buckner, Jack, Stanley, Tunsil, Lawson, Floyd I would be just fine with. I don think I forgot anyone....

DEFENSE!! DEFENSE!! Did everybody already forget the havoc the Broncos D unleashed on Joe in the first game of the season along with the never ending pressure they put on Brady in the AFC Tittle Game and Cam in the Super Bowl?

[rmcjacket23]

15 hours ago, WNC-Raven said:

Remember Rice, Kruger, Torrey, KO, Jernigan and Maxx were all second round picks. Our future does not depend on our first round pick like many tend to obsess over. Is it important to choose a franchise type player at #6? Of course but I believe Ozzie will make some good picks and some bad but in the end I have faith that he will remind us just how good he is when picking near the top of every round and with 4 fourth rounders to boot.

Mayock's mock draft last night was "interesting" for the Ravens.

He had us trading back to 15 with Tennessee so they could come up and get Tunsil. He ended up having us take Josh Doctson at #15, which I disagreed with, but that's not really the point (I can't see a scenario where this organization ever takes two first round WRs in back to back years).

He didn't go into the parameters of the trade, but obviously we would get at least a second round pick this year from Tennessee. The question becomes... which one? They pick at 33, 43 and 45. If we asked for 33, we would then have three picks in the top 36, which to me is a deal I'd be interested in.

But what if the offer is for picks 43 or 45? Do we still like that deal. Still have three top 45 picks... good enough to move back 9 spots? The difference here is I'd say a lot of the players we'd be interested in would likely be gone. Top three tackles will surely be gone, Hargreaves is likely gone, possibly miss out on guys like Leonard Floyd or Shaq Lawson if we drop to 15 also, who I'd gladly take in that range. So it makes it difficult to see what direction we would give picking in that spot.

I think we would certainly move back into the teens if we get a top 10 second round pick, and maybe even top half.

If you like the draft value chart (I'm not a big fan), it says we could reasonably ask for #33 in that deal. If we were to get a pick like #45, we'd probably get a 4th or 5th rounder as well.

Edited April 28, 2016 by rmcjacket23

[whobilly]

  16 hours ago, Saxxin said:

  16 hours ago, ravensnj said:

  17 hours ago, Saxxin said:

Ezekiel Elliott is my prediction. That's a weapon Ozzie won't pass up.

You know, I have debated this in my mind. I know if we don't select him, we will regret it in 5 yrs when he's a Pro bowl regular. He is clearly a game changer and would carry us to many wins. However, our defense is to depleted, and unfortunately, we need to add there.

With 7 picks in the first 4 rounds there is plenty of talent left to fill that need. Rice was a game changer, Elliot will be one too. As much as we need more depth on defense (all the starters are healthy right now) a talent like Elliot doesn't fall our way often. I just don't see Ozzie passing on him if he's there.

our backfield is already very crowded, we need to focus on defense. I like the combo of Forsett, Allen, and Taliafarro if he stay's healthy, and even Richardson if he can actually run through a gap

Denver won it all with a relentless pressure. We need to get back to that DEFENSE!! DEFENSE!!

[bioLarzen]

1 hour ago, IceDevilHH81 said:

I would be ok with a trade if Tunsil, Buckner or Ramsey aren`t there

 

In Mayock's draft both Tunsil and Buckner was still on the board - the Titans actually traded up for Tunsil.

[WNC-Raven]

  16 hours ago, WNC-Raven said:

Remember Rice, Kruger, Torrey, KO, Jernigan and Maxx were all second round picks. Our future does not depend on our first round pick like many tend to obsess over. Is it important to choose a franchise type player at #6? Of course but I believe Ozzie will make some good picks and some bad but in the end I have faith that he will remind us just how good he is when picking near the top of every round and with 4 fourth rounders to boot.

Mayock's mock draft last night was "interesting" for the Ravens.

He had us trading back to 15 with Tennessee so they could come up and get Tunsil. He ended up having us take Josh Doctson at #15, which I disagreed with, but that's not really the point (I can't see a scenario where this organization ever takes two first round WRs in back to back years).

He didn't go into the parameters of the trade, but obviously we would get at least a second round pick this year from Tennessee. The question becomes... which one? They pick at 33, 43 and 45. If we asked for 33, we would then have three picks in the top 36, which to me is a deal I'd be interested in.

But what if the offer is for picks 43 or 45? Do we still like that deal. Still have three top 45 picks... good enough to move back 9 spots? The difference here is I'd say a lot of the players we'd be interested in would likely be gone. Top three tackles will surely be gone, Hargreaves is likely gone, possibly miss out on guys like Leonard Floyd or Shaq Lawson if we drop to 15 also, who I'd gladly take in that range. So it makes it difficult to see what direction we would give picking in that spot.

I think we would certainly move back into the teens if we get a top 10 second round pick, and maybe even top half.

If you like the draft value chart (I'm not a big fan), it says we could reasonably ask for #33 in that deal. If we were to get a pick like #45, we'd probably get a 4th or 5th rounder as well.

To me we don't trade back to 15 without getting at least the #33 pick. The more desirable trade back would be with CLE. If they secretly covet a QB a want to jump in front of SF to get him we could trade back only 2 spots and possibly pick up another 2nd rounder. Or someone could try to trade with us to jump in front of both SF and CLE. Ozzie could also package one of our trade able 4th rounders with our #6 and get better value as well.

[rmcjacket23]

25 minutes ago, WNC-Raven said:

To me we don't trade back to 15 without getting at least the #33 pick. The more desirable trade back would be with CLE. If they secretly covet a QB a want to jump in front of SF to get him we could trade back only 2 spots and possibly pick up another 2nd rounder. Or someone could try to trade with us to jump in front of both SF and CLE. Ozzie could also package one of our trade able 4th rounders with our #6 and get better value as well.

I'm not expecting SF to target a QB at #7 now that the top two are off the board... there's the appearance of a pretty steep drop off there. 

[WNC-Raven]

  42 minutes ago, WNC-Raven said:

To me we don't trade back to 15 without getting at least the #33 pick. The more desirable trade back would be with CLE. If they secretly covet a QB a want to jump in front of SF to get him we could trade back only 2 spots and possibly pick up another 2nd rounder. Or someone could try to trade with us to jump in front of both SF and CLE. Ozzie could also package one of our trade able 4th rounders with our #6 and get better value as well.

I'm not expecting SF to target a QB at #7 now that the top two are off the board... there's the appearance of a pretty steep drop off there. 

Also with CLE new roster building philosophy I doubt they would draft a second tier QB at 6 or 8 for that matter. I'm just speculating because anything can happen when teams are desperate on draft day.

[rmcjacket23]

1 minute ago, WNC-Raven said:

Also with CLE new roster building philosophy I doubt they would draft a second tier QB at 6 or 8 for that matter. I'm just speculating because anything can happen when teams are desperate on draft day.

Cleveland could look QB if they trade back, but I don't see it at #8 or in a trade up. If they could move down into the teens or 20s, then its possible, but I think they're looking at more day 2 guys.

[Jared Schellin]

Bosa would be an nice addition, but just because Ramsey only has 3 interceptions in his college career doesn't mean he can't be a ball hawk on the Ravens. You just can't pass up that much talent

if Ramsey is there of course

[EdBallhawkReed20]

Hey I like Mayock Draft board if the Ravens trade back!
#15 Josh Doctson would solidify receiver core for years to come. You won't find his level of talent later in the draft. Ravens need a No.1 receiver
#33 Noah Spence or Myles Jack Pass Rusher or Jack injury could push him back this far and he will be a starter
#36 Artie Burns

I think WR in the first round is a smart option considering the strength of the draft and the drop off in talent. Not to mention you know Steve Smith is leaving next year. Thats not the case at OLB. The argument for drafting for the future can be made at both positions, plus Baltimore will get a starter day 1. Bosa, does not start considering our team as of now SIzzle and Dumervil. Ramsey only three ints would start, but most likely need a few years as all shutdown CB's. I really love the Josh Doctson pick up in an offense friendly league. Baltimore would have a WR that is a threat after the catch, red zone threat, great route running which they currently don't have on roster outside of Smith. That would be perfect for Baltimore and they could have an awesome receiver tandem that compliment each other in Perriman in Doctson in the following seasons. The defensive players could be picked up with the later picks including the additional one from the Titans.

[Grapple Raven]

With the 6th pick, I am still sticking with one of Lawson, Stanley, Buckner or Hargreaves.

[rmcjacket23]

15 minutes ago, Grapple Raven said:

With the 6th pick, I am still sticking with one of Lawson, Stanley, Buckner or Hargreaves.

Yeah, don't see it. Stanley maybe.

Lawson and Hargreaves are reaches at 6 I think, and I think Ozzie knows that too.

[EddiOK]

1st rd: Ramsay, Bosa, or Buckner
2nd rd: Hargreaves

[FloridalovesRavens]

We need defense! Please don't trade back.

[Peter Griffin]

Hope they pick Tunsil....

[harfordravenfan]

3 hours ago, EddiOK said:

1st rd: Ramsay, Bosa, or Buckner
2nd rd: Hargreaves

You really thing Hargreaves makes it out of the top 15 let along to our 2nd round pick?