Rmw10's One and Only Mock Draft

[Edgar]

4 hours ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

Covering tight ends and blowing up screens and blitzing. 

 

You don't avoid a guy like cravens because you need a 34ilb who is strong in coverage, you draft him and make him a hybrid. Our run defense likely won't be falling off a cliff anytime soon and we desperately need help doing the exact things I mentioned above, so cravens is tailor made for us. If deone bucannon can do it then I'm certain cravens can do it better.

Why are you certain? bucannon is faster and more physical than Cravens.

I don't see an exceptional cover guy. Much better in zone and I sure don't see a physical player.

 

 

 

 

[JoeyFlex5]

1 hour ago, Edgar said:

Why are you certain? bucannon is faster and more physical than Cravens.

I don't see an exceptional cover guy. Much better in zone and I sure don't see a physical player.

 

 

 

 

Well I simply disagree There. I see a very physical player and comparing them as prospects cravens is better in coverage and forces turnovers in the passing game, if you compare a college player to a veteran then obviously one looks more refined but it's an unfair comparison.

[Edgar]

3 hours ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

Well I simply disagree There. I see a very physical player and comparing them as prospects cravens is better in coverage and forces turnovers in the passing game, if you compare a college player to a veteran then obviously one looks more refined but it's an unfair comparison.

Yes. We disagree about his physicality.

I see his merits but must admit I'm not crazy about the pick. Particularly giving up a pick to get him. Give me Sean Davis instead at three. Much more athletic and a better tackler.

[GrimCoconut]

8 hours ago, Edgar said:

Yes. We disagree about his physicality.

I see his merits but must admit I'm not crazy about the pick. Particularly giving up a pick to get him. Give me Sean Davis instead at three. Much more athletic and a better tackler.

Sean Davis has legit coverage concerns at times, though. I like him a lot, but he's not the greatest coverage guy. He needs work there. He is crazy athletic, though.

[Winchester]

15 hours ago, Edgar said:

Why are you certain? bucannon is faster and more physical than Cravens.

I don't see an exceptional cover guy. Much better in zone and I sure don't see a physical player.

 

 

 

 

My opinion  Cravens is very physical in his hits and taking on blocks. Buchanan may be a little faster in a straight line but Cravens has better instincts and takes better angles. And is better getting through blocks. He is naturally bigger as well. He is nearly 230 and can hold 235 or even 240 lbs if he is dedicated to the weightroom. His only legit probs in coverage were covering speed receivers which he will not cover as LB. He is fine with TEs and RBs and WRs over the middle. And if a lb can do that then he isvexceptional in coverage. He is great in zone coverage as well.

[JoeyFlex5]

7 hours ago, Winchester said:

My opinion  Cravens is very physical in his hits and taking on blocks. Buchanan may be a little faster in a straight line but Cravens has better instincts and takes better angles. And is better getting through blocks. He is naturally bigger as well. He is nearly 230 and can hold 235 or even 240 lbs if he is dedicated to the weightroom. His only legit probs in coverage were covering speed receivers which he will not cover as LB. He is fine with TEs and RBs and WRs over the middle. And if a lb can do that then he isvexceptional in coverage. He is great in zone coverage as well.

Never thought I'd say this but spot on analysis Winchester lol

[ALI624]

1 minute ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

Never thought I'd say this but spot on analysis Winchester lol

"Dogs and cats living together, it's anarchy."

[Edgar]

8 hours ago, Winchester said:

My opinion  Cravens is very physical in his hits and taking on blocks. Buchanan may be a little faster in a straight line but Cravens has better instincts and takes better angles. And is better getting through blocks. He is naturally bigger as well. He is nearly 230 and can hold 235 or even 240 lbs if he is dedicated to the weightroom. His only legit probs in coverage were covering speed receivers which he will not cover as LB. He is fine with TEs and RBs and WRs over the middle. And if a lb can do that then he isvexceptional in coverage. He is great in zone coverage as well.

You don't want him covering Bell. You don't want him covering Eifert.

You don't want him gaining weight. Slow to begin with.