rmw10

Rmw10's One and Only Mock Draft

38 posts in this topic

I've largely been against mock drafts in recent years, but with us being up early at 6, I wanted to give it a shot.  I'm not usually one to predict trades either, but I want to offer an alternate point of view as something I can truly see happening.  Without further ado...

ROUND 1:

1.  Tennessee Titans: Laremy Tunsil | OT | Ole Miss

I just don't see this not being the pick.  I'm not buying the Ramsey interest.  Tunsil just makes too much sense for the Titans.  Sure, Lewan has been decent a few times and has shown some growth, but I can't see a team with a young QB bypassing a chance at one the surest LT's in the past few drafts.  All speculation leads to Lewan being moved to the right side.  Insert Tunsil from day 1 and Tennessee takes a step forward.

2.  Cleveland Browns: Carson Wentz | QB | North Dakota State

This is another case of me just not believing that they'll go in a different direction.  They need a QB and Hue loves his QBs.  RG3 is a decent bridge QB until they think Wentz is ready, which could be in year 1 or maybe in year 2.  Regardless, QB has to be the pick here.  Wentz isn't my favorite QB in this class, but I think he'd fit very well in Cleveland, which is why the opt for him over Goff.

3.  TRADE - San Francisco 49ers: Jared Goff | QB | California

A lot is made of the Ravens being in prime position at #6 for a team to get in front of SF, but I don't expect SF to sit still and let that happen.  They have needs, but also the capacity to move.  They clearly don't really want Kaep and any team that goes with Gabbert is doomed.  Instead of hanging around and hoping they get their guy, a good fit for Kelly's offense, they make the aggressive move and ensure they get what they believe is the QB of the future.

4.  Dallas Cowboys: Jalen Ramsey | CB | Florida State

The Cowboys luck out and get their top guy to add to an already impressive track record in round 1.  Say what you want about Jerry Jones, but he's nailed his picks recently.  Maybe it can be attributed to his counterparts, but here's another prime opportunity to add an elite player to that roster.  Jalen Ramsey and Byron Jones is a great start to fixing that defense.

5.  Jacksonville Jaguars: Myles Jack | LB | UCLA

The Jaguars get their coveted front 7 help by adding one of the premier athletes in the class.  It's long been rumored that the Jags would prefer to go with the front 7, and here's their opportunity to do so.  Jack should thrive in Bradley's defense, being able to roam and make plays in space.  He can fill a myriad of roles in run defense, coverage, and even pass rushing.

6.  Baltimore Ravens: Joey Bosa | LB | Ohio State

16148777-mmmain.jpg

I think the Ravens would prefer that Jack make it to them, but it doesn't happen and they get a very closely rated consolation prize in Joey Bosa.  He's an instant impact pass rusher who already has a strongly developed game.  He might not be this athletic nightmare, but he's got great hand usage, technique, and power.  I see no problems with him being a stand up rusher.  With Suggs and Dumervil still around, Bosa will have an opportunity to learn the position while being allowed to do what he does best - get after the QB.

7.  San Diego Chargers: DeForest Buckner | DE | Oregon

The Chargers make a smart decision and move back, pick up additional picks, and still get a top talent at a position of need.  Despite reported interest in Myles Jack, they opt to address S (where they view Jack) a bit later in the draft.  After a few years with the dreadful Kendall Reyes as a starting DL, they finally get a much needed upgrade that could be huge fit for their defense.

ROUND 2:

36.  Kendall Fuller | CB | Virginia Tech


b5d16840be9dc62d4f95256927e65793.jpg

The Ravens want a defensive playmaker.  Here's the guy.  Fuller might be a bit of a gambler in a sense, but he's going to create turnovers and that's been a huge issue for this defense.  He doesn't come without his injury concerns of course, and micro fracture surgery is no joke, but we take the risk and get a playmaker.  Fuller is a Leslie Frazier dream, and could really push him to the next level.

59.  TRADE -  Baltimore Ravens: Su'a Cravens | LB | USC

0ap3000000401484.jpg

The Ravens show an aggressive edge by moving up to get a guy they love, using their late 4th round pick.  Of course, the NFL trade chart isn't a perfect science, but a 4th round pick puts them at the end of the 2nd, somewhere in this range.  With reports that the Ravens are looking for a S/LB hybrid type of player and reports from Tony Pauline that the Ravens love Cravens, the move is made.  I view Cravens as a late 2nd type of guy, so maybe we have to move a little bit higher, but the Ravens get their guy for the middle of the field and complete this year's defensive makeover.

ROUND 4:

104.  Kenny Lawler | WR | California

I think it was made clear that the Ravens aren't going to be looking WR until the mid rounds unless there's a no brainer pick available, and here's their guy.  Lawler can play myriad of roles.  He may not be the fastest guy ever, but he can high point a ball and play outside or in the slot.  He might not be a deep threat in a sense, but he has impressive footwork and short area quickness.  He'll largely operate out of the slot, but don't shy away from his ability to stretch a defense, despite his lack of true deep speed.

132.  Dominique Robertson | OT | West Georgia

The Ravens always seem to have one small school guy in their pocket, and Robertson is my guy this year.  He comes from tiny West Georgia where he dominated the competition, after a brief stint in JuCo and Texas Tech.  The lack of competition is a concern, but the size and athleticism profile fits well at T.  The team trusts Castillo to develop guys, and here's his opportunity to do so.

134.  Matt Ioannidis | DT | Temple

Here's what I believe to be another Ravens type of pick.  Ioannidis is a blue collar type of guy that would fit well into a rotation at DE.  He's not some athletic freak, but a strong defender at the point of attack who I believe could eventually work his way into a starting role.  He's versatile enough to play in a 3-4 or in a nickel set as well.

ROUND 6:

182.  Austin Blythe | C | Iowa


With Jensen or Urschel being pushed to G in place of KO, the Ravens opt to add some more interior OL depth and do so with a smart and savvy player in Austin Blythe.  He's not overly strong, but comes with athleticism and would slot in well in the ZBS.

209.  Jared Norris | LB | Utah

The Ravens double up at LB after going with more a hybrid type in Cravens in round 2. Norris has the makings of a guy that could adequately fill a depth role while doing very well on ST.  He has his limitations in coverage, but could develop into a solid 2 down guy if needed.  Arthur Brown's roster spot becomes even more volatile with the addition of Norris.

Edited by rmw10
5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we don't get Jack I want Cravens.   I don't know much about fuller,  but first 3 picks address needs.   I would be more than happy here

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Stevin said:

why everybody wants fuller? i don't like him at all

Fuller plays agressive (something we lack), can be excellent in zone coverage and mirror his receiver, has amazing ball skills and great physical attirbutes. He does get lost on some occasions, but that comes with his gambler attitude. Like a certain Marcus Peters.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great job I love the first 3 picks. Fuller would be very good in a tampa 2 schemes when he keeps everything in front of him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think fuller is a reach at 36 but trading up for cravens is what really makes me like this. I love bosa for this team and I like his potential as a 5tech. With the stud TEs and big receivers of the AFCN I think cravens would be the most disruptive and feared player in the division. Fuller is an injury risk and may project better as a FS because he is at his best when he can keep the play in front of him but he absolutely can force turnovers even if he does give up chunks at corner. Overall I really like this draft even if I think we can do better than fuller at 36

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

I still think fuller is a reach at 36 but trading up for cravens is what really makes me like this. I love bosa for this team and I like his potential as a 5tech. With the stud TEs and big receivers of the AFCN I think cravens would be the most disruptive and feared player in the division. Fuller is an injury risk and may project better as a FS because he is at his best when he can keep the play in front of him but he absolutely can force turnovers even if he does give up chunks at corner. Overall I really like this draft even if I think we can do better than fuller at 36

I keep telling you Fuller may not even be there at 36, it's really not a reach to take him there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

I still think fuller is a reach at 36 but trading up for cravens is what really makes me like this. I love bosa for this team and I like his potential as a 5tech. With the stud TEs and big receivers of the AFCN I think cravens would be the most disruptive and feared player in the division. Fuller is an injury risk and may project better as a FS because he is at his best when he can keep the play in front of him but he absolutely can force turnovers even if he does give up chunks at corner. Overall I really like this draft even if I think we can do better than fuller at 36

It's easy to say that but keep in mind that every year, there are multiple guys who surprise you and go much higher than you think, and others that do the opposite.  For what it's worth, I don't think it would too farfetched to switch Fuller and Cravens around.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rmw10 said:

It's easy to say that but keep in mind that every year, there are multiple guys who surprise you and go much higher than you think, and others that do the opposite.  For what it's worth, I don't think it would too farfetched to switch Fuller and Cravens around.

I think swapping their spots is the more realistic and value scenario lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More of a Buckner fan than Bosa, but ok. Fuller is hard to say...saw some of his tape, he's been toasted but played weoll mostly, coach'em up and he could be a pro bowler. Cravens' pick is BIG...if no Myles Jack, this kid's athleticism in the midfield would be huge plus. I see Lawler being a contributor, NFL talent is there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

I think swapping their spots is the more realistic and value scenario lol

I think that's fair.  I always try to go with what I think is going to happen over what I want to happen.  I'm of the opinion that the league is not as high on the Alexander train as it may seem.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

I still think fuller is a reach at 36 but trading up for cravens is what really makes me like this. I love bosa for this team and I like his potential as a 5tech. With the stud TEs and big receivers of the AFCN I think cravens would be the most disruptive and feared player in the division. Fuller is an injury risk and may project better as a FS because he is at his best when he can keep the play in front of him but he absolutely can force turnovers even if he does give up chunks at corner. Overall I really like this draft even if I think we can do better than fuller at 36

Cravens will get drafted top50. Maybe even have to take him at 36 if ravens value him that much. Like the Lawler pick one of my fav players in the draft!! Much like Tyler Boyd Many deep receivers have average top end speed but have instant acceleration in a blink and have unpredictable lightning fast moves. And he is a complete receiver!! plays like Jarvis Landry but slightly more athletic and shifty than Landry.  Isaac Bruce was a big play receiver up til he retired cuz he knew how to get deep. Again however there are not 104 players getting picked before him in my opinion. Only pick im not cool with is Fuller in round2. Or any cornerback in round2. The cornerbacks in this draft are anybody's guess who is going to turn out elite after some experience. Whose light is going to come on. There are going to be round4 guys outperforming round2 guys.  I would prefer a tackle like Coleman.And Cback late

Edited by Winchester
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think De Costa and Ozzie absolutely want to draft a CB in round 2, because they haven't selected a CB early in the draft lately, save for Jimmy, and they realised how it cost the team. 

If Alexander is there we take him, but I honestly believe it's a dream now, so Fuller is the best guy available.

Edited by Jacquouille
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think we're in a good spot for a trade. Trading to #3 might be too rich for San Fran. If the Ravens get offers from other teams to jump above the 49ers. we could just bounce those back to them for a better deal. Similar to when we traded up 1 spot with the Browns to get Haloti Ngata. That'd be a big win for us.

I heard the same connection from Cravens to Baltimore and, I have to say, he's an impressive player.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Remsey doesn't go top 3 I have the Cowboys taking Bosa and The Jags taking Jack leaving Remsey for the Ravens at 6

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, berad said:

I still think we're in a good spot for a trade. Trading to #3 might be too rich for San Fran. If the Ravens get offers from other teams to jump above the 49ers. we could just bounce those back to them for a better deal. Similar to when we traded up 1 spot with the Browns to get Haloti Ngata. That'd be a big win for us.

I heard the same connection from Cravens to Baltimore and, I have to say, he's an impressive player.

I just don't believe the 49ers are willing to chance that. I'm of the opinion that if they think Goff is a franchise QB, they're going to make sure they get him. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dame2 said:

If Remsey doesn't go top 3 I have the Cowboys taking Bosa and The Jags taking Jack leaving Remsey for the Ravens at 6

I think that's more wishful thinking than realistic, personally. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's funny how your first two picks are the same as I projected. Then the picks from there into the fourth are also similar positions. Lol I find that neat. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, GrimCoconut said:

I think it's funny how your first two picks are the same as I projected. Then the picks from there into the fourth are also similar positions. Lol I find that neat. 

I feel like we've always had similar tastes in prospects. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, rmw10 said:

I feel like we've always had similar tastes in prospects. 

Yeah, needless to say I think you did a great job. I'd mock Cravens to us but I didn't want to project a trade but I can totally see it. I do think we'll pick another edge defender, but that's more a hunch than anything lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Edgar said:

Where will Cravens play for us?

 

Covering tight ends and blowing up screens and blitzing. 

 

You don't avoid a guy like cravens because you need a 34ilb who is strong in coverage, you draft him and make him a hybrid. Our run defense likely won't be falling off a cliff anytime soon and we desperately need help doing the exact things I mentioned above, so cravens is tailor made for us. If deone bucannon can do it then I'm certain cravens can do it better.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

Covering tight ends and blowing up screens and blitzing. 

 

You don't avoid a guy like cravens because you need a 34ilb who is strong in coverage, you draft him and make him a hybrid. Our run defense likely won't be falling off a cliff anytime soon and we desperately need help doing the exact things I mentioned above, so cravens is tailor made for us. If deone bucannon can do it then I'm certain cravens can do it better.

Exactly right. The NFL game is changing in that regard. A smaller safety / bigger LB is becoming more of a tool, provided they have adequate coverage and solid tackling. Plus this Cravens guy is hyper athletic.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, rmw10 said:

I just don't believe the 49ers are willing to chance that. I'm of the opinion that if they think Goff is a franchise QB, they're going to make sure they get him. 

QBs are the hot commodity so you might be right. This is also the 49ers FO so who really knows?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now