[News] 2016: Ravens Mock Draft Monitor 3.0

[concretejimmy]

I don't know if l'm explain this right but why are players are going to other teams signing big contracts and then they know that they won't get the full amount and get cut 2-3 years from now because of cap numbers or underperforming? For ex K.O. got 5 year 60M right; is the Raiders going pay the entire 60M to K.O and stay for 5 years. Or cut him 2 or 3 years, waste K.O. time, and should've stay in Batimore with money and full amount of time. Players should be just staying with thier team with a little less than going somewhere else thinking they would have the full cash amount and then get cut 2-3 years. I'll bet the Dolphins will cut Suh eventually because his cap number and Suh should've stay in Detriot. I hope that make sense. I don't know if I'm making sense LOL. :-)

Are you rich. A few million dollars isn't a little less.

[concretejimmy]

Denver needs a QB?  Why not shop our #2 and resign Jimmy Clausin? More draft picks!!!!

I like it. But having a viable backup is also important. I already made that point when people said trade for McCarron.

[concretejimmy]

Tunsil is not going to be there guys, Titans got him for sure. Now they should go after a defensive talent first and then find a guard later in the draft (Monroe can play LT for this year). If they draft Stanley as the # 6 pick then they are going to miss all of those defensive talents and Ozzie gonna regret it again. They need to go after Bosa, Buckner, Ramsey, etc with thier pick.

Agreed

[concretejimmy]

  On ‎3‎/‎8‎/‎2016 at 1:46 PM, DefensiveMind said:

If we draft Stanley at 6 Im gonna be really sad. We need playmakers. You can find solid OL in 2nd and 3rd rounds (osemele)

But KO is mostly a guard. We're looking for a LT. Much, much harder to find on day 2.

KO can play LT. Why he got out priced in FA.

[concretejimmy]

Out of all of them I think the people from PFF deserve the most praise as they truly understand player's value and what teams should need the most as far as upgrading a certain position. The thought of getting Tunsil makes me far more excited than Stanley. I think the forums are divided on picking Stanley at 6, but let's look at it this way. Stanley is a good prospect and has the ability to develop into a great Tackle, but the same could be said about others that are going later in the round and into the second. His lack of strength and the rumors of him not loving the game of football make you question his ability to develop as well. But if we we're set on taking him then I'd hope we would move back 3-5 spots and find a way to get an additional pick or move up in another round. Protecting Flacco is a huge priority, but this is a rare opportunity for us and we cannot look back and say, well we passed on Bosa, Buckner, or Jack, whom I suspect will be pro bowls are instant stars. But time will tell...

Took the words outta my mouth

[concretejimmy]

Stop with the Ronnie Stanley bandwagon. he has the physical traits of a #6 pick but not the skill level you want to see. Sure you can coach him along and he will develop some but for a #6 pick you don't pick players that are going to need time adjusting. You look for an immediate contributor, which just means they can become a valuable piece of the puzzle from day 1. That does not necessarily mean instant starter status. Drafting Stanley would likely mean he sits behind Monroe anyways so I really fail to see how using the #6 pick is advantageous, when there is solid LT's available later int he draft.

Thank you

[concretejimmy]

  On ‎3‎/‎8‎/‎2016 at 0:25 PM, 757RavensFan said:

Yeah, I was like, "wait, what?"  there's no way Tunsil slides to 6. I swear I should get paid for my mock, it can't be any worse than these "draftniks"!

I mean it is very unlikely, but outside of Tennesee and maybe SD, I think that the rest are taking the top defensive players. It would be a gift from God. It is possible that Tennessee takes Bosa, Cleveland takes Wentz, San Diego takes Ramsey, Dallas takes Jack, and Jacksonville takes Buckner or Hargreaves. It will all depend on whether the Titans think their young lineman will develop to be good starters or not.

Tunsil won't make it past the Chargers.

[concretejimmy]

  On ‎3‎/‎8‎/‎2016 at 0:18 PM, WNC-Raven said:

I don't know who most of these "Draftniks" are but if Tunsil is there at 6 you will see us running to the podium. If there is one thing we know about mock drafts it's that they are always wrong. I'm still hoping someone will trade up to pick a second QB ahead of us. SD could also surprise and take a OT. That could make 2 OT and 2 QB's taken ahead of us. Wishful thinking

Some mocks just shout "Look, I'm different than most mocks!" There was one about 2 weeks ago wihich had Tunsil taken at #11...

Really? I seen some bad ones.

[ibleedpurpleandblack]

On 3/8/2016 at 0:23 PM, ibleedpurpleandblack said:

I envision drafting Stanley - with KO going to Oakland and Eugene not able to stay healthy there is the potential for a a large hole to fill. With Flacco's extension they need to provide him some long term protection and Stanley is the guy to do that.

hmmmmm, seems someone gave me a negative but seems that I called exactly who they were going to pick @ #6 and they picked up a player with the potential to be a great LT and someone who can provide protection for Flacco!!!