52520Andrew

Who should we take at #6? The new and improved version

Who should we pick?   141 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should we pick?

    • LaQuan Treadwell
      8
    • Ronnie Stanley
      13
    • Vernon Hargreaves
      61
    • Noah Spence
      4
    • Shaq Lawson
      8
    • Robert Nkemdiche
      0
    • Ezekiel Elliott
      6
    • Jared Goff
      0
    • Carson Wentz
      1
    • Emmanuel Ogbah
      1
    • A'Shawn Robinson
      0
    • Leonard Floyd
      3
    • Jaylon Smith
      3
    • Other(please let us know who)
      33
  2. 2. Who is most likely to make our pick?

    • Myles Jack
      47
    • DeForest Buckner
      50
    • Joey Bosa
      29
    • Laremy Tunsil
      1
    • Jalen Ramsey
      14

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

817 posts in this topic

2 hours ago, GrimCoconut said:

I think it'd his shoulder shrug that makes people think this.

Add on top of it he moves his neck like a turkey when he talks. Next season you'll be able to start a drinking game during his press conferences and take a shot whenever he moves his neck forward.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only player in this draft worth trading up for may be Tunsil, but we won't do it. No make that we can't afford to do it. Because we aren't going to have too many picks next year. No comps and we'll be drafting at #32 in the first round.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Jacquouille said:

So I didn't like him at first, but as an ILB/SS (now that we said goodbye to Hill), Cravens could be terrific in our defense. I think we end up with Bbuckner in round 1 and Cravens paired with Mosley would benefit a lot from that since they're both good blitzers and Cravens is very good off the edge. He's basically a poor man's Myle Jack, and with Daryl and Hill out he could provide help for both holes.

I just searched him after you said it. I've heard the name before but never watched tape. I fell in love. I think he would be good at weak side linebacker next to Mosley. The only issue I have with him is his size (which he could probably bulk up a little like most prospects in the draft). If he was our 2nd round pick I would be ecstatic. Cravens on the inside and Bosa taking snaps at defensive end and some at OLB until Suggs departs and then take over his OLB position. That is my dream mock now that you point that out. He may have become my favorite 2nd round player now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After the RG3 trade, we could easily see Tunsil, Bosa, Ramsey, Jack and Buckner all go before 6. That would really suck. I think we'd end up going VH3 in that situation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Boddiebroadus said:

How much would it cost to trade up in front of the jags?

Depends on who you trade with. To go to the Cowboys I wouldn't doubt it would cost a 2nd rounder, 3rd rounder, and 2nd rounder next year at least. Moral of the story is it is not worth it and with Wentz lighting up the pro day the Ravens will most likely get Ramsey, Tunsil, Bosa, Buckner, or Jack. There are some talented guys in the 2nd round of this draft. Not too deep after the third though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, trevorsteadman said:

Depends on who you trade with. To go to the Cowboys I wouldn't doubt it would cost a 2nd rounder, 3rd rounder, and 2nd rounder next year at least. Moral of the story is it is not worth it and with Wentz lighting up the pro day the Ravens will most likely get Ramsey, Tunsil, Bosa, Buckner, or Jack. There are some talented guys in the 2nd round of this draft. Not too deep after the third though.

i heard the Chargers are willing to trade but no way it would cost that much. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Boddiebroadus said:

i heard the Chargers are willing to trade but no way it would cost that much. 

It's possible with how shallow this draft is. To pry Ramsey or Tunsil away from the Chargers is going to cost a lot. It might not cost the 3rd pick in next years draft but I can almost guarantee at least the 2nd and 3rd in this years. Which is why I think sitting is the best option as long as a quarterback is taken in the top 5 we get premier talent.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On March 23, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Clmraven said:

I would honestly take Elliott at 6 over Stanley, but even if the big 5 are gone VH3 would be my guy.

Would anyone consider Conklin over Stanley?  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See I don't think we lose in this draft. Here's why. If Cleveland picks a QB, then we'll get 1 of 5 premier players  in the draft. More than likely Jack, Buckner or Bosa. However, if a QB isn't taken before we pick, then we become a really ideal trade back prospect for a team like the Rams because right after us come the Niners who more than likely will take either Goff or Wentz with their pick. So, you want one of these all the way down at #6, you trade with us. Way better than trading with Tennessee right?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ravensdan said:

Would anyone consider Conklin over Stanley?  

In some ways I like him more. I love Stanley's pass protection, but he leaves something to be desired in run blocking. I like anger and nastiness in my OL, so I don't like how Stanley looks out there. He looks so effortless but in a way it almost looks like he doesn't care, lol. That said, I'm not sure who I would take. Stanley is a better pass protector. I just love Conklin's attitude. 

5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ravensdan said:

Would anyone consider Conklin over Stanley?  

Im not sure I could pick Conklin over Stanley as a prospect right now, but I'm a huge fan of Conklin and I think he could end up being the better player down the road if he really works on his technique and footwork.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, GrimCoconut said:

I think it'd his shoulder shrug that makes people think this.

He may do that shrug and get banged in the mouth. Do like the tape tho.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, thieverycorporation said:

He may do that shrug and get banged in the mouth. Do like the tape tho.

Bosa is all man, I don't think he's too worried about that. 

 

If he's doing the shrug that means someone just got beat, they may wanna try to stop him between the whistles before they start to throw hands at the dude they can't stop lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, GrimCoconut said:

In some ways I like him more. I love Stanley's pass protection, but he leaves something to be desired in run blocking. I like anger and nastiness in my OL, so I don't like how Stanley looks out there. He looks so effortless but in a way it almost looks like he doesn't care, lol. That said, I'm not sure who I would take. Stanley is a better pass protector. I just love Conklin's attitude. 

If we take him I'm gonna be……..P'd

I wouldn't hesitate to get a cut vet tackle of substance after june 1 with Pitta's savings.

Monroe knows he's a short deal here.

One/two with incentives should do it. We win and you can take the check for next year to the bank and not even play. Madden money of course. No but seriously there will be a great candidate trust and believe. I don't believe a draftee with questioned work ethic will be drafted day one.

Edited by thieverycorporation
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

Bosa is all man, I don't think he's too worried about that. 

 

If he's doing the shrug that means someone just got beat, they may wanna try to stop him between the whistles before they start to throw hands at the dude they can't stop lol

True just light hearted fun Bro. But there are new rules. Bosa hit the showers! Harbaugh (Why didn't you just ignore it dude?)Damnit!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When first looking at possible picks at six, I was blown away by the possibilities and told myself there was no way I could be disappointed. The more I thought about it, the more I realized there are really only five players I would be really happy with at six. Obviously, that means there is a nightmare (for me) scenario out there in which all five get taken off the board before us. This fear was driven home when I saw it happen in a mock on NFL.com.

 

Basically, we need someone to take a QB or a big reach (c'mon, Celevland) before us. If we end up with Tunsil, Ramsey, Jack, Bosa, or Buckner, I'm happy with day one. If they all go, I'd like to trade back.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, usmccharles said:

Is anyone worried that Jack wont have a pro day?

Not really, maybe that would let him slide to us, which I wouldn't complain about.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Ravenseconbeast said:

Thehype aroound Myles Jack being top 5 now is a joke.   

Joke? Because he isn't doing a pro day., pretty sure all that tape says what you need to know.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, usmccharles said:

Joke? Because he isn't doing a pro day., pretty sure all that tape says what you need to know.  

Teams can be picky at times so its possible he could fall. I'm surprise that Jack isn't a 100 percent healthy by now since his  injury wasn't severe . 

Edited by jazz1988
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, usmccharles said:

Joke? Because he isn't doing a pro day., pretty sure all that tape says what you need to know.  

Never thought he was a top 5.  I've voiced my opinion about him since last season.  

The guy can't stuff runs, whiffs tackles like a boss, gets injured even at the slightest touch.   I don't like him one bit.  Jmo though! 

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MightyRaven said:

I hope Browns take treadwell or another WR

I hope so too, but I don't think even the Browns are that dumb.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, beanfigger said:

When first looking at possible picks at six, I was blown away by the possibilities and told myself there was no way I could be disappointed. The more I thought about it, the more I realized there are really only five players I would be really happy with at six. Obviously, that means there is a nightmare (for me) scenario out there in which all five get taken off the board before us. This fear was driven home when I saw it happen in a mock on NFL.com.

 

Basically, we need someone to take a QB or a big reach (c'mon, Celevland) before us. If we end up with Tunsil, Ramsey, Jack, Bosa, or Buckner, I'm happy with day one. If they all go, I'd like to trade back.

Quite honestly, at #6, the only guy that I truly would be excited to draft at that spot is Ramsey. I'd still be happy with any of the other four...but this is a special pick for us (we never draft this high), and I think Ramsey is probably the best player in this class, who would also happen to fill a huge hole for us.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now