Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
The Raven

Peyton Manning HGH Controversy

32 posts in this topic

Umm, not quite.

1. Canseco outed people mostly based on watching them use PEDs. That would qualify as eyewitness testimony from credible sources. Plus, some of the people he outed went on to fail tests later, which was validation.

2. ARod got suspended when they actually showed evidence if him using, not based on a written article that was immediately retracted. They had evidence that was provided in a court of law as part of Biogenesis AND, most importantly, he confessed to using PEDs in the past prior to even being suspended. Note that he confessed in 2007 to past steroid use, yet he wasn't suspended by MLB until 2013.

3. Lance Armstrong may have had rumors, but he literally passed hundreds of drug tests before being caught. Agaim, like the others, they actually have EVIDENCE.

Sorry, but your examples hurt your argument more than help it. I can assure you MLB won't touch these guys based on a report that the source acknowledges to fabricating. They don't even suspend players for admitting usage.

 

There is evidence but you choose to ignore it.  I don't know why though.  Oh well bury your head in the sand.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0