Way Too Early Mock Draft

[Maryland]

It would be hard for me to pass on Myles Jack in the 2nd round. I'm not even sure I could do it if Boyd is there. That's a dilemma if I ever heard one. Jack and Mosley? Are you freaking kidding me?

Jack will probably move back into the first once his knee checks out at the combine. Having a hybrid LB who can cover like a safety is becoming a coveted position in the NFL. He can match up with the new breed of TEs, whether it's a run or pass play. 

[GrimCoconut]

Jack will probably move back into the first once his knee checks out at the combine. Having a hybrid LB who can cover like a safety is becoming a coveted position in the NFL. He can match up with the new breed of TEs, whether it's a run or pass play.

Yeah. That's why he's probably the only guy I'd want over others at that point. While ILB isn't a grave need it's a sneaky one and I'd take Jack likely all day at that point, although it could certainly be a tough decision depending on who's there

[JoeyFlex5]

It would be hard for me to pass on Myles Jack in the 2nd round. I'm not even sure I could do it if Boyd is there. That's a dilemma if I ever heard one. Jack and Mosley? Are you freaking kidding me?

yeah i find it hard to believe jack falls to the 2nd, but im taking him in a heartbeat, that is too much to pass up, hes a nickel corner and free safety playing linebacker, hes a unique weapon tailor made to dominate in the MODERN DAY nfl. of all the first round talents that could fall to the 2nd, ogbah is the only one id take over him, but i think its all moot since ogbah and jack are both going top half

[January J]

Jack will probably move back into the first once his knee checks out at the combine. Having a hybrid LB who can cover like a safety is becoming a coveted position in the NFL. He can match up with the new breed of TEs, whether it's a run or pass play.

which would also help us tremendously with Mosleys recent struggles in coverage. Them paired together would be phenomenal- and Daryl smith is getting up there.

[52liveforever]

Either that or bosa-Boyd -bell in the first 3

Or Hargreaves-ogbah-cooper

May have to trade back into the backend of the first to grab ogbah. He may even go before that but I'm not real sure to be honest.

Oh the possibilities. I was never a huge draft or college guy up until this past year but I'm beyond stoked for this April.

Anybody interested in Myles jack or think he would fit here?

 

How about Bosa and Ogbah. We wouldn't even need a secondary because the ball would never leave the qb's hands

[January J]

How about Bosa and Ogbah. We wouldn't even need a secondary because the ball would never leave the qb's hands

lol hell yeah. Id be happy with any of those guys man. They would have to totally botch this entire draft for me not to come away satisfied. We're bound to get atleast 2 or 3 guys who will come in and make a difference right off the bat.

[edthehead]

I would trade back in a heartbeat , get more draft picks , you can build a team with draft picks, cincy did get stronger due to that carson palmer deal, Cleveland had a chance they just picked the wrong QB,  Many people here say that ,treadwell,and other WR are not all that, so if that is the case why draft a WR in the 3rd or 4th round, they have to be garbage. 

   IF we are in fact top 5 and we get a chance to trade back get them picks,, 

    I do more reading than writing here, there are many smart people with great scenarios. I say that because you all may know better players coming out the following year , so lets accumulate those draft picks and trade up to snatch a better bosa or a more reliable treadwell .   

[GrimCoconut]

I would trade back in a heartbeat , get more draft picks , you can build a team with draft picks, cincy did get stronger due to that carson palmer deal, Cleveland had a chance they just picked the wrong QB, Many people here say that ,treadwell,and other WR are not all that, so if that is the case why draft a WR in the 3rd or 4th round, they have to be garbage.

IF we are in fact top 5 and we get a chance to trade back get them picks,,

I do more reading than writing here, there are many smart people with great scenarios. I say that because you all may know better players coming out the following year , so lets accumulate those draft picks and trade up to snatch a better bosa or a more reliable treadwell .

I agree that we should trade back but that depends on where we pick, the deal we get, and the players still available, as well as how far back we're trading.

If Bosa or Tunsil are gone, I'd strongly consider trading back of the right deal is there. If Hargreaves is still there, I'd consider taking him although I'd also consider trading back and still try to get him. It depends on how far we're trading back. I believe we should come away with one of Bosa, Tunsil, Hargreaves, Treadwell or Ogbah with our first pick. I strongly believe these are some of the very best players in this class.

[BmoreBird22]

Rd 4- CB Kendall Fuller. I like your fuller pick as well, but I think he falls deeper than the second due to his injury.  

There is zero reason to think he'd fall this far due to a torn meniscus. The recovery time for rehabilitation is about three to four months, so we're talking about something that should be good to go by the time the combine rolls around (six months time from injury). And if there's one thing we know, an injury will only cause a monumental fall if it costs a player their rookie season (Aaron Colvin), but it will not hinder their draft stock (Todd Gurley) if they check out.

[GrimCoconut]

There is zero reason to think he'd fall this far due to a torn meniscus. The recovery time for rehabilitation is about three to four months, so we're talking about something that should be good to go by the time the combine rolls around (six months time from injury). And if there's one thing we know, an injury will only cause a monumental fall if it costs a player their rookie season (Aaron Colvin), but it will not hinder their draft stock (Todd Gurley) if they check out.

Ethical dilemma question: what need satisfies the most good--taking Fuller or Boyd with our second round pick?

[PurpleCity5]

I agree that we should trade back but that depends on where we pick, the deal we get, and the players still available, as well as how far back we're trading.

If Bosa or Tunsil are gone, I'd strongly consider trading back of the right deal is there. If Hargreaves is still there, I'd consider taking him although I'd also consider trading back and still try to get him. It depends on how far we're trading back. I believe we should come away with one of Bosa, Tunsil, Hargreaves, Treadwell or Ogbah with our first pick. I strongly believe these are some of the very best players in this class.

I agree, my personal top 3 is Bosa, Hargreaves and Tunsil, I want to come away with either of them, I really would like to trade back a few spots and get Hargreaves, I'm convinced he's the best player in this draft. If we could nab an extra first and get him, I'd lose my mind. 

 

I'd personally swap Treadwell and Lawson, but Treadwell's tape does not disappoint.  

Edited November 28, 2015 by PurpleCity5

[52liveforever]

There is zero reason to think he'd fall this far due to a torn meniscus. The recovery time for rehabilitation is about three to four months, so we're talking about something that should be good to go by the time the combine rolls around (six months time from injury). And if there's one thing we know, an injury will only cause a monumental fall if it costs a player their rookie season (Aaron Colvin), but it will not hinder their draft stock (Todd Gurley) if they check out.

 

Wishful thinking perhaps.

[BmoreBird22]

Ethical dilemma question: what need satisfies the most good--taking Fuller or Boyd with our second round pick?

... I have no answer. This is tearing my apart hard because they're my two favorite prospects, honestly

[PurpleCity5]

... I have no answer. This is tearing my apart hard because they're my two favorite prospects, honestly

I think it depends on what we do with our first. If we take Hargreaves then I think we take Boyd. If we take someone like Bosa, than I'm surely taking Fuller. Though taking Hargreaves and Fuller back to back wouldn't be foolish considering that we've had problems with depth at CB. 

Edited November 28, 2015 by PurpleCity5

[BmoreBird22]

I think it depends on what we do with our first. If we take Hargreaves then I think we take Boyd. If we take someone like Bosa, than I'm surely taking Fuller. Though taking Hargreaves and Fuller back to back wouldn't be foolish considering that we've had problems with depth at CB.

I just see a very pro ready, press man corner. He's played in a very multiple pro style defense that asked him to play the slot, outside, and safety at times. This kid is going to be something special

[PurpleCity5]

I just see a very pro ready, press man corner. He's played in a very multiple pro style defense that asked him to play the slot, outside, and safety at times. This kid is going to be something special

I like him myself, but if we take Hargreaves then I think I'll take Boyd in the 2nd round. Fuller is my #2 CB behind Hargreaves but you have to think the further he'll fall if he slips to the 2nd round.

Edited November 28, 2015 by PurpleCity5

[BmoreBird22]

I like him myself, but if we take Hargreaves then I think I'll take Boyd in the 2nd round. Fuller is my #2 CB behind Hargreaves but you have to think the further he'll fall if he slips to the 2nd round.

I honestly don't even think he'll fall into the second, but I don't foresee a huge fall in any case.

He played through a torn meniscus this year, which exudes toughness, and he had very solid game tape from 2013 and 2014. Not to mention he's got some really solid ball skills

[PurpleCity5]

I honestly don't even think he'll fall into the second, but I don't foresee a huge fall in any case.

He played through a torn meniscus this year, which exudes toughness, and he had very solid game tape from 2013 and 2014. Not to mention he's got some really solid ball skills

I think it depends on how he checks out. Honestly it takes a lot to play through a torn meniscus, he really has some heart. Edited November 28, 2015 by PurpleCity5

[BmoreBird22]

I think it depends on how he checks out. Honestly it takes a lot to play through a torn meniscus, he really has some heart.

I can't imagine him not checking out. I read a torn meniscus is about a three to four month rehab process and from the time of surgery to the combine, that's six months. Now, he'll have to decide if he wants to come out, but that should not stop him

[January J]

I think it depends on what we do with our first. If we take Hargreaves then I think we take Boyd. If we take someone like Bosa, than I'm surely taking Fuller. Though taking Hargreaves and Fuller back to back wouldn't be foolish considering that we've had problems with depth at CB.

literally took the words out my mouth.

[52liveforever]

I think it depends on what we do with our first. If we take Hargreaves then I think we take Boyd. If we take someone like Bosa, than I'm surely taking Fuller. Though taking Hargreaves and Fuller back to back wouldn't be foolish considering that we've had problems with depth at CB.

Count me in

[Robbyrobbass]

How about Bosa and Ogbah. We wouldn't even need a secondary because the ball would never leave the qb's hands

as much as I love high powered offensive attacks I would love this