757RavensFan

3rd and long is our Achilles heel!

42 posts in this topic

For as long as I can remember, a good majority of our losses come during key points in the game when the defense can't make a stop on 3rd and long.  If I'm not mistaken, Cinci converted on three 3rd and longs (12, 15, 18) that all led to scores. We're no longer a "bend and don't break" defense, but more like a "break and hope for a miracle" defense.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I basically just assume every third down will be a first down

At this point, when the other team gets the ball I just wonder if they will get three points or seven

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's defiantly a problem. I remember the years when I would be happy to see the d on the field. Now, I have no confidence in us getting a stop at any point in the game. Feels weird to say because for so many years it was the defense that carried the team, not anymore. All we can hope for is a bad throw or a dropped pass.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For as long as I can remember, a good majority of our losses come during key points in the game when the defense can't make a stop on 3rd and long. If I'm not mistaken, Cinci converted on three 3rd and longs (12, 15, 18) that all led to scores. We're no longer a "bend and don't break" defense, but more like a "break and hope for a miracle" defense.

I pray for 3rd and short. Anything 4 and under, hoping they might run. I remember when 3rd and long was a death sentence for the opposition. It seems teams lose yards on purpose now, knowing they'll either get PI, holding, or a td. It's disgusting. You shouldn't fear third and long, but more than half the time, I don't even want to watch. It's like the secondary forgets everything they've been taught. Lack awareness, communication, technique and flat out, common sense. This team as a whole is just undisciplined.

I'd also like to add that, many of the injuries to our secondary, could've been due to their extended stay on the field. We obviously don't really sub CBs and they're too many long drives.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong side of the ball

 

didnt read post, responded to thread title.

 

its because we have no pass rush.

 

Edit: and we also have no run game

Edited by FlackAttack
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd also like to add that, many of the injuries to our secondary, could've been due to their extended stay on the field. We obviously don't really sub CBs and they're too many long drives.

 

It would be nice to keep our DB's fresh, like the Dline rotation. But from now on we can sub any DB we want it won't make any difference at all our opponents will score at least a FG.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bend until you break is our Achilles heel.

Pees is Cam 2.0, can't get out of his conservative comfort zone either.

If Pagano gets fired, we better grab him.

 

nah, stay away from pagano. love the guy but we need fresh ideas. we need a young buck willing to prove himself.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whole 4th quarter we played man and tried to blitz to bring pressure and you guys saw the results.

 

if you see how jimmy , arrington and especially melvin got abused when we tried man coverage, so i can certainly understand why he opts for prevent zone defense lol.

 

not sure what option if left if prevent and blitz/man cov aint working ....

-3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whole 4th quarter we played man and tried to blitz to bring pressure and you guys saw the results.

if you see how jimmy , arrington and especially melvin got abused when we tried man coverage, so i can certainly understand why he opts for prevent zone defense lol.

not sure what option if left if prevent and blitz/man cov aint working ....

But Pees only plays soft zone? 3 man rush? Ummmm... conservative? He does what people ask, people don't realize and still attack him, even when he does what they say we should do.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But Pees only plays soft zone? 3 man rush? Ummmm... conservative? He does what people ask, people don't realize and still attack him, even when he does what they say we should do.

 

explains why im getting negged and no replies lol.

 

even the bengals confirmed he did it so they cant really dispute it either  :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

explains why im getting negged and no replies lol.

even the bengals confirmed he did it so they cant really dispute it either :lol:

Cause many here have no idea what they're talking about.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cause many here have no idea what they're talking about.

 

yup i knew the moment they where blaming him for stuf like players missing tackles lol.

 

position coaches say hi on that. :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whole 4th quarter we played man and tried to blitz to bring pressure and you guys saw the results.

 

if you see how jimmy , arrington and especially melvin got abused when we tried man coverage, so i can certainly understand why he opts for prevent zone defense lol.

 

not sure what option if left if prevent and blitz/man cov aint working ....

 

The only options are blitzing with man coverage or a "prevent zone defense"? There are innumerable plays you can call, depending on how specific you would like to go. Different zone schemes and coverages. A combination of man and zone. A trap coverage. A zone blitz. 3-deep with man underneath.

 

Depending on how specific you'd like to go, there are a lot of things you can do with 11 defenders.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only options are blitzing with man coverage or a "prevent zone defense"? There are innumerable plays you can call, depending on how specific you would like to go. Different zone schemes and coverages. A combination of man and zone. A trap coverage. A zone blitz. 3-deep with man underneath.

 

Depending on how specific you'd like to go, there are a lot of things you can do with 11 defenders.

 

point out where i used the word `` only.``

 

ill wait.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

point out where i used the word `` only.``

 

ill wait.

 

The syntax of these words leads one to infer that meaning

 

not sure what option if left if prevent and blitz/man cov aint working ....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The syntax of these words leads one to infer that meaning

 

it only leads to that if you want it to.

basicially you are just asuming what i meant.

 

its funny cause redrum who posted right after i made that post knew exactly what i meant.

 

both of us noticed that any form of zone coverage couple with a 3-4 man rush is called a prevent defense by many here even though it aint and the same people where specially asking for more man to man coverage and blitzes which is specficially why i only used those words. 

 

what makes this hilarious though is thats its you again who decided to run with something completely different trying to be a smart butt.

 

geez i wonder why :rolleyes:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now