BR.COM Dynasty Fantasy Football League

[RavensPunkXVX]

2 hours ago, ludy51 said:

Sorry

YEAH YEAH YEAH 

[52520Andrew]

Looks like there are no more winless teams with @BmoreBird22 getting his first win. 

[BmoreBird22]

30 minutes ago, 52520Andrew said:

Looks like there are no more winless teams with @BmoreBird22 getting his first win. 

Didn't even change my line up and got a win

Oh right. 

[RavensPunkXVX]

I dropped to 3-2!

[52520Andrew]

12 minutes ago, BmoreBird22 said:

Didn't even change my line up and got a win

Oh right. 

Yeah 7 out of 16 teams didn't put a full lineup in this week. A couple of those are players who have been active but there are about 4 who I consider pretty inactive at this point and that isn't even counting you who missed both the drafts and have set your lineup once this season. 

Maybe trimming to fewer teams would help for future years

[RavensPunkXVX]

2 minutes ago, 52520Andrew said:

Yeah 7 out of 16 teams didn't put a full lineup in this week. A couple of those are players who have been active but there are about 4 who I consider pretty inactive at this point and that isn't even counting you who missed both the drafts and have set your lineup once this season. 

Maybe trimming to fewer teams would help for future years

Probably would be easier to keep everyone active. 16 handles is a lot to control 

[allblackraven]

16 minutes ago, 52520Andrew said:

Yeah 7 out of 16 teams didn't put a full lineup in this week. A couple of those are players who have been active but there are about 4 who I consider pretty inactive at this point and that isn't even counting you who missed both the drafts and have set your lineup once this season. 

Maybe trimming to fewer teams would help for future years

I am again benefiting from inactivity

[52520Andrew]

3 minutes ago, RavensPunkXVX said:

Probably would be easier to keep everyone active. 16 handles is a lot to control 

Yeah we still have a good chunk of people who are able to get on and set their lineups, just need to weed out the inactives. 

On another note, it is pretty crazy that someone can lose all their keepers this year and still have 2 wins. They may have a decent shot at the division with the other 3 teams being inactive

1 minute ago, allblackraven said:

I am again benefiting from inactivity

Yeah I saw that score, you should be good although Olsen could always be a threat

[BmoreBird22]

29 minutes ago, 52520Andrew said:

Yeah 7 out of 16 teams didn't put a full lineup in this week. A couple of those are players who have been active but there are about 4 who I consider pretty inactive at this point and that isn't even counting you who missed both the drafts and have set your lineup once this season. 

Maybe trimming to fewer teams would help for future years

It's not the amount of teams, it's the fact that it's fleaflicker. If it were ESPN, I'd be doing something every week, but who remembers that website?

[allblackraven]

1 minute ago, 52520Andrew said:

Yeah we still have a good chunk of people who are able to get on and set their lineups, just need to weed out the inactives. 

On another note, it is pretty crazy that someone can lose all their keepers this year and still have 2 wins. They may have a decent shot at the division with the other 3 teams being inactive

Yeah I saw that score, you should be good although Olsen could always be a threat

Hopefully KB gets all the targets today, not Olsen. I need KB to have better game than Julio last week to win in another league.

[52520Andrew]

Just now, BmoreBird22 said:

It's not the amount of teams, it's the fact that it's fleaflicker. If it were ESPN, I'd be doing something every week, but who remembers that website?

Doesn't stop the other 9 people from coming on. Been in plenty of ESPN leagues, there are always inactives

[52520Andrew]

2 minutes ago, allblackraven said:

Hopefully KB gets all the targets today, not Olsen. I need KB to have better game than Julio last week to win in another league.

Yeah tough to tell with Cam out

[RavensPunkXVX]

14 minutes ago, 52520Andrew said:

Yeah we still have a good chunk of people who are able to get on and set their lineups, just need to weed out the inactives. 

On another note, it is pretty crazy that someone can lose all their keepers this year and still have 2 wins. They may have a decent shot at the division with the other 3 teams being inactive

Yeah I saw that score, you should be good although Olsen could always be a threat

You referring to the YOU LIKE THAT team? My dad took that one over. Lol gave me a fourth for Osweiler. And actually has decent #2-#3 receivers stepping up. Royal, Beasley, Coates, Edelman. 

[Moderator 3]

49 minutes ago, RavensPunkXVX said:

I dropped to 3-2!

You need to fire someone.

[52520Andrew]

Just now, RavensPunkXVX said:

You referring to the YOU LIKE THAT team? My dad took that one over. Lol gave me a fourth for Osweiler. And actually has decent #2-#3 receivers stepping up. Royal, Beasley, Coates, Edelman. 

Yeah that is who it is, pretty good job being done over there

[RavensPunkXVX]

2 minutes ago, Moderator 3 said:

You need to fire someone.

Someone has to take the fall. Just unacceptable. Head coach is on the hot seat.

[Inqui]

32 minutes ago, allblackraven said:

I am again benefiting from inactivity

I swear the only reason I made the playoffs last year was because half my games were against people who never turned up. It takes a lot of shine off winning games.

I'd be in favour of trimming to 12.

[allblackraven]

1 minute ago, Inqui said:

I swear the only reason I made the playoffs last year was because half my games were against people who never turned up. It takes a lot of shine off winning games.

I'd be in favour of trimming to 12.

You say this like there was any shine in my possible win to begin with

[Inqui]

6 minutes ago, RavensPunkXVX said:

You referring to the YOU LIKE THAT team? My dad took that one over. Lol gave me a fourth for Osweiler. And actually has decent #2-#3 receivers stepping up. Royal, Beasley, Coates, Edelman. 

I'm having a coaching nightmare in this league this week. I thought I'd already put Lacy back in, and wasted a spot on Buckner because I didn't reset the lineup until the day after the TNF game. Not that there's an awful lot I could have done.

[RavensPunkXVX]

5 minutes ago, 52520Andrew said:

Yeah that is who it is, pretty good job being done over there

Yeah, I think he mentioned shopping Edelman if anyone here is interested. I think he's wanting a HB. I'll have to check though. 

 

I think we should switch platforms and drop teams next year. More convenient and more activity.

[Inqui]

3 minutes ago, allblackraven said:

You say this like there was any shine in my possible win to begin with

I was talking about my wins last year, though looking at your matchup the same thing applies, haha. The guy's starting two players on IR, two players on byes and someone who was out.

[52520Andrew]

5 minutes ago, RavensPunkXVX said:

Yeah, I think he mentioned shopping Edelman if anyone here is interested. I think he's wanting a HB. I'll have to check though. 

 

I think we should switch platforms and drop teams next year. More convenient and more activity.

I am a bit shallow on my RBs so I would have to pass but maybe someone else is interested

Yeah I would be fine with a platform switch but a lot of the inactives on here are not around the forums much anymore either so I think it just being the website isn't taking everything into account. I do like having the current system though with IDPs and all the different players. More in depth than your typical fantasy league.

[BmoreBird22]

36 minutes ago, 52520Andrew said:

Doesn't stop the other 9 people from coming on. Been in plenty of ESPN leagues, there are always inactives

All 12 teams in my ESPN league have been active every single week.

But nine of 16 teams is not a good turnout and I guarantee that if you polled the reason why, it's because people forget the league exists all together.

I have three ESPN leagues and check them at least once a week to make moves. I just entirely forget about fleaflicker.

[RavensPunkXVX]

6 minutes ago, 52520Andrew said:

I am a bit shallow on my RBs so I would have to pass but maybe someone else is interested

Yeah I would be fine with a platform switch but a lot of the inactives on here are not around the forums much anymore either so I think it just being the website isn't taking everything into account. I do like having the current system though with IDPs and all the different players. More in depth than your typical fantasy league.

You could still do IDPs. I love all of the IDPs. I'm just saying if you're in multiple leagues, it might be a little more convenient, if you're on your ESPN app or NFL.com app just to go through and look at all of your rosters. 

[allblackraven]

3 minutes ago, BmoreBird22 said:

All 12 teams in my ESPN league have been active every single week.

But nine of 16 teams is not a good turnout and I guarantee that if you polled the reason why, it's because people forget the league exists all together.

I have three ESPN leagues and check them at least once a week to make moves. I just entirely forget about fleaflicker.

How hard is it to make a bookmark folder with links to all your leagues in it?

[BmoreBird22]

Just now, allblackraven said:

How hard is it to make a bookmark folder with links to all your leagues in it?

Considering I use mobile for my fantasy, semi

[allblackraven]

5 minutes ago, BmoreBird22 said:

Considering I use mobile for my fantasy, semi

You need a bigger phone then

[BmoreBird22]

Just now, allblackraven said:

You need a bigger phone then

I have a Galaxy S7 Edge. I just don't tinker with it too much as far as setting those things up, but I can look into it.

[RavensPunkXVX]

Get an iPhone 7plusPLUS. I have flea flicker bookmarked in my browser.

[allblackraven]

Just now, BmoreBird22 said:

I have a Galaxy S7 Edge. I just don't tinker with it too much as far as setting those things up, but I can look into it.

Should be able to create Chrome browser shortcut that opens the fleaflicker league page