Mt. Crushmore

2015 Forum Mock: Discussion Thread

6,384 posts in this topic

The Seahawks now officially own Round 4, Pick 5.

 

As I said...... keep giving me your 4th round picks everyone.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said...... keep giving me your 4th round picks everyone.

I'll give you mine for your 3rd.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll give you mine for your 3rd.

 

I could.... but you may want to ask Baltimore about that first.

 

So let's see......

 

One 1st Round Pick

One 2nd Round Pick

Four 4th Round Picks

Two 6th Round Picks

Three 7th Round Picks

 

Gonna reload the Seahawks

Edited by JO_75
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Hawks need reloading?

 

Yep gonna draft a bunch of RBs who can get in from the one yard line so Bevell can not use them if we are one yard away from winning the Super Bowl again. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Jaguars place 3rd round tender on 

Will Ta'ufo'ou - FB

 

 

 

There is no 3rd round tender.  Either 1st round, 2nd round, or original round.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UGH... Can't believe linebacker UFA is during the weekend of carneval.... Does vacationing and partying mean nothing to you people

 

(p.s. the above is to be read with a hint of sarcasm, I'm annoyed that I have bad luck like that, not actually angry at anyone /disclaimer)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

REMINDER:

 

I'm seeing a lot of outdated and incomplete SoF's out there.  Get those updated or you won't be able to participate in FA!  We have to be able to verify that you have the cap space to make moves in FA.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UGH... Can't believe linebacker UFA is during the weekend of carneval.... Does vacationing and partying mean nothing to you people

 

(p.s. the above is to be read with a hint of sarcasm, I'm annoyed that I have bad luck like that, not actually angry at anyone /disclaimer)

 

You can designate someone to bid on your behalf.  Just be sure to give them a max price on a player you may want.  It's not ideal, but you wouldn't be completely shut out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very close call on the Houston franchise tag, if the Chiefs had under 51 players(draft picks included) it would be invalid as there would need to be enough space to get to 51 players. Thankfully they have 52 players. Just a reminder though to keep player totals updated or you could be caught off guard...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can designate someone to bid on your behalf.  Just be sure to give them a max price on a player you may want.  It's not ideal, but you wouldn't be completely shut out.

 

Yup... I'll probably do something like that, for a couple of players, but it's just not the same, and I kind of left my team quite thin on LB's expecting to stock up in FA a Little.... Oh well... I'll find a way ;) I'm not really going to complain about being in Brazil for carneval, because I'm missing something in a forum game :D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very close call on the Houston franchise tag, if the Chiefs had under 51 players(draft picks included) it would be invalid as there would need to be enough space to get to 51 players. Thankfully they have 52 players. Just a reminder though to keep player totals updated or you could be caught off guard...

 

Technically, teams could fill out the rest of their rosters with UDFAs since they're free.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The following teams look to be behind at updating SoF's...

 

Texans (more of a mess that really need to be cleaned up so we can understand it)

Raiders (just need to update the Davante Adams deal, I believe)

Dolphins (no real moves yet, but needs to add the rest of the SoF)

Packers (some formatting issues make it a little confusing)

Jets (no updates since the SoF was posted)

Redskins (no SoF or depth chart posted)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very close call on the Houston franchise tag, if the Chiefs had under 51 players(draft picks included) it would be invalid as there would need to be enough space to get to 51 players. Thankfully they have 52 players. Just a reminder though to keep player totals updated or you could be caught off guard...

 

Would projected compensatory picks be included?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically, teams could fill out the rest of their rosters with UDFAs since they're free.

 

Pretty sure we established last year that they were only free if you were over 51 players

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now