Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Admin 3

Week 8 - Baltimore Ravens (5-2) at Cincinnati Bengals (3-2-1)

2,743 posts in this topic

Every short yardage situation it's a compact tight formation and rarely do we ever get anything positive from it! Yet we continue to use it.

I've said it before, spread them out and run a qb sneak in those situations

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Elam can not tackle, I think that is proven. On the Big play to Sanu he had a chance to make a tackle while sanu was bobbling the pass, he didn't do it. He had a chance for a safety on Dalton or back to the 1 yard line, he didn't do it.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those wanting the points I get it. But do you take 3 and put the Bengals on the 20, or do you try for 7 and if you don't make it out the Bengals at the half yard line?

The defense should be able to hold this, right?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm disgusted on so many different levels right now.... this is exactly the type of game we end up losing... don't forget the 2 near INTs on the last drive and then the needless 4th and go.... 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those wanting the points I get it. But do you take 3 and put the Bengals on the 20, or do you try for 7 and if you don't make it out the Bengals at the half yard line?

The defense should be able to hold this, right?

Take the 3

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

remember that play with Daniels that scored twice against the Steelers? how come that play was retired? worked twice and haven't seen it since

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those wanting the points I get it. But do you take 3 and put the Bengals on the 20, or do you try for 7 and if you don't make it out the Bengals at the half yard line?

The defense should be able to hold this, right?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.