Draft a Franchise: Discussion

[-Truth-]

Lots of people on here wanted him in the seventh or as an UDFA. Carraun Reid and Kerr were to small school players a lot of people liked

 

I wanted Kerr as well the moment he went undrafted, but fortunately, Brandon Williams has been on a tear thus far. Very much looking like our NT of the future.

[BmoreBird22]

I wanted Kerr as well the moment he went undrafted, but fortunately, Brandon Williams has been on a tear thus far. Very much looking like our NT of the future.

He absolutely destroyed the Redskins. If he can get more consistent with his technique and balance, he could be a stalwart for the years to come

[52520Andrew]

I thought I was on 12 hours again?

I don't think we ever specifically stated the criteria for getting the 12 hour limit back. I know there were some ideas thrown around with 3 times under a limit and you get back up but I don't think we ever figured out what that limit was since we agreed just barely staying under the new limit wasn't good enough to restore the old limit. There wasn't a rule set for that so we need to figure out that limit.

[allblackraven]

Pick in just before genetics started. I figure I'll finish up because this game is almost over.

Allblack taking Couplin from me...

I knew you would notice. I like him a lot and looks like the Lions are sold on him and the other young safety, too.

[-Truth-]

Good pick in Bryant. He's flashed in Cleveland as a rusher.

[BmoreBird22]

Good pick in Bryant. He's flashed in Cleveland as a rusher.

So I guess you know you're up now...

[-Truth-]

So I guess you know you're up now...

 

Just signed on and found out. The pick will be in shortly.

[Ozzsome]

I don't think we ever specifically stated the criteria for getting the 12 hour limit back. I know there were some ideas thrown around with 3 times under a limit and you get back up but I don't think we ever figured out what that limit was since we agreed just barely staying under the new limit wasn't good enough to restore the old limit. There wasn't a rule set for that so we need to figure out that limit.

 

So I am down to 3 hours now because of the second skip?

[rmw10]

So I am down to 3 hours now because of the second skip?

 

I wouldn't sweat it.  That's more a misunderstanding than anything.  Have you had 3 picks in a row on time before the one this morning?  I know that was discussed but we've never actually had anyone get in a position to earn time back lol

[gabefergy]

Good pick in Bryant. He's flashed in Cleveland as a rusher.

Thanks, now  I have both Bryants heh

[Ozzsome]

I wouldn't sweat it.  That's more a misunderstanding than anything.  Have you had 3 picks in a row on time before the one this morning?  I know that was discussed but we've never actually had anyone get in a position to earn time back lol

 

I guess lol I don't know which of my picks got skipped

 

Nevermind, I'll go with 3 or 6 hours or whatever my time now is

 

 

Who wants my next 2 picks? Just in case

[rmw10]

I guess lol I don't know which of my picks got skipped

 

Nevermind, I'll go with 3 or 6 hours or whatever my time now is

 

 

Who wants my next 2 picks? Just in case

 

Stick with 6.  No sense in penalizing you there.  We're nearing the end anyways so it shouldn't be too bad.  You always get stuck with the night shift though.

[Mt. Crushmore]

Richard Rodgers gives me a true backup to Jimmy Graham in my TE heavy offense.  I took Rodgers in the 7th round of the forum mock and he went in the 3rd in real life.  I now have 4 TEs which may seem like a lot, but Graham-Rodgers and Allen-Wilson are great compliments to each other.

[rmw10]

Richard Rodgers gives me a true backup to Jimmy Graham in my TE heavy offense.  I took Rodgers in the 7th round of the forum mock and he went in the 3rd in real life.  I now have 4 TEs which may seem like a lot, but Graham-Rodgers and Allen-Wilson are great compliments to each other.

 

Good pick.  I was looking at him but wanted more of a blocker.

[rmw10]

I guess lol I don't know which of my picks got skipped

 

Nevermind, I'll go with 3 or 6 hours or whatever my time now is

 

 

Who wants my next 2 picks? Just in case

 

Oh, and I can take your picks if no one else can.  I'll be in and out for a little bit tonight though.

[52520Andrew]

I wouldn't sweat it.  That's more a misunderstanding than anything.  Have you had 3 picks in a row on time before the one this morning?  I know that was discussed but we've never actually had anyone get in a position to earn time back lol

 

Just going hypothetical here but if someone takes 5 hours for each pick once they get a 6 hour limit, I don't know if that should be good enough to restore them to 12 hours. I mean 5 hours at this point is a pretty decent wait and still shows signs of inactivity depending on the timing. IMO, if someone wants to re-earn time on the 12 hour time limit, they have to show that they will be more active than before when they got skipped and that there will be no future problems unless something happens. 

 

Not trying to pick on Ozzsome here, Ozzsome has been pretty active throughout this process, he just has the bad luck of being behind a ton of people in similar time zones while he is in a different one. But I do think we should make it harder for certain other users. Either we make it a bit harder to regain the 12 hour limit or we could switch it up and if you regain the 12 hour limit and get skipped, you now have a 3 hour limit. Just some ideas to throw out there at this point for future versions.

 

Richard Rodgers gives me a true backup to Jimmy Graham in my TE heavy offense.  I took Rodgers in the 7th round of the forum mock and he went in the 3rd in real life.  I now have 4 TEs which may seem like a lot, but Graham-Rodgers and Allen-Wilson are great compliments to each other.

Good pick.  I was looking at him but wanted more of a blocker.

 

You both know I am a fan of this pick lol

 

I guess lol I don't know which of my picks got skipped

 

Nevermind, I'll go with 3 or 6 hours or whatever my time now is

 

 

Who wants my next 2 picks? Just in case

 

6 at this point is fine, not like it matters much anyways at this point lol

[BmoreBird22]

If he had a six hour limit and only used 5 each time, I wouldn't see a point in gaining it back because he's not going over

[rmw10]

Well, I did not receive Ozzsome's picks before he went offline, so I guess we'll be waiting until the morning again, assuming we get to him tonight.

[rmw10]

And now I have them.  He reappeared.

[Ozzsome]

Oh, and I can take your picks if no one else can. I'll be in and out for a little bit tonight though.

Sent, thanks!

[Ozzsome]

If he had a six hour limit and only used 5 each time, I wouldn't see a point in gaining it back because he's not going over

The problem is that I live in Europe, if I do not have time to look up some players the night before I am up and you guys pick in the middle of the night I am as good as an autoskip because of the time differential.

Having said that, I am good with 6 hours

[BmoreBird22]

The problem is that I live in Europe, if I do not have time to look up some players the night before I am up and you guys pick in the middle of the night I am as good as an autoskip because of the time differential.

Having said that, I am good with 6 hours

But if you're picking within the time range anyway, I don't think it should be a problem.

Now, if it's a repeat problem and you pick within 10 hours, I'd say extend it again

[allblackraven]

The problem is that I live in Europe, if I do not have time to look up some players the night before I am up and you guys pick in the middle of the night I am as good as an autoskip because of the time differential.

Having said that, I am good with 6 hours

Admit it, you just sleep too much

[Ozzsome]

But if you're picking within the time range anyway, I don't think it should be a problem.

Now, if it's a repeat problem and you pick within 10 hours, I'd say extend it again

Shouldn't be a problem. I'll just make a small board

[Ozzsome]

Admit it, you just sleep too much

Lol I do. I still have holidays

[ravensdan]

I went with Anthony Levine and Robert golden with my last two picks. Both are primarily valuable special teams players. And both have seen a bit more action on defense this year so either could be a valuable db depth player.

[allblackraven]

The Llanfairpwllgwyngyllyregogchwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch Puffins select...

 

 

 

Robert Golden, S

ravensdan has selected Robert Golden, CB few picks ahead of you. I'm not sure wether there are two RGs (CB and S) but your pick might be invalid.

[52520Andrew]

ravensdan has selected Robert Golden, CB few picks ahead of you. I'm not sure wether there are two RGs (CB and S) but your pick might be invalid.

 

I would imagine he plays both and I blame rmw for not updating his board quick enough

[rmw10]

I would imagine he plays both and I blame rmw for not updating his board quick enough

 

Updated per your wishes.  Trying to get some photo editing done.

[rmw10]

How did you know that she's my inspiration?  Her and Tony Danza.  

 

You're up, just in case Andrew making Ozzsome's pick throws you off.