Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mt. Crushmore

2014 Forum Mock: Discussion Thread

8,648 posts in this topic

That is the rule in the NFL, but why is it not on the rule page?

 

I don't know why its not there but we used this last year and earlier today––in this thread––I told Clutch Ravens that tagging Jairus Byrd would be extra due to it being the 2nd year in a row.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just go add it to the rules page...

 

That would still be added after the trade was made...I read the rules, screen shoted the last edit time on there. 

 

Listen, I wanna play a fair game but that wasn't under the rules. Adding it after I trade, is not fair.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the rules up there are common sense, and this is a fantasy game so "common sense" doesn't really apply (hence extended cap and the June 1st rule we made for every team).

It wasn't in the rules.

Sorry it wasn't spelled out. It is a pretty rare occurrence, but SAM knew full well about it and should have explained to you. Its just a basic Franchise Tag rule that we all have to abide by.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry it wasn't spelled out. It is a pretty rare occurrence, but SAM knew full well about it and should have explained to you. Its just a basic Franchise Tag rule that we all have to abide by.

Yeah my bad... Must've been overlooked......

 

If you want I'll give you another piece to compensate for it! 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry it wasn't spelled out. It is a pretty rare occurrence, but SAM knew full well about it and should have explained to you. Its just a basic Franchise Tag rule that we all have to abide by.

 

Alright, it's fine. Let's go add it under rules. I'll just make some cuts .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would still be added after the trade was made...I read the rules, screen shoted the last edit time on there.

Listen, I wanna play a fair game but that wasn't under the rules. Adding it after I trade, is not fair.

You have two options. Take the trade back or pau the extra. We aren't going to make exceptions because you whine about it not being posted.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would still be added after the trade was made...I read the rules, screen shoted the last edit time on there.

Listen, I wanna play a fair game but that wasn't under the rules. Adding it after I trade, is not fair.

I believe at least 1 other owner has abided by the rule already.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have two options. Take the trade back or pau the extra. We aren't going to make exceptions because you whine about it not being posted.

 

Not whining at all. Why are you being a jerk when I am just saying it wasn't posted as a rule? I just said it's fine, I'll pay for it. Don't know why you have to be so instigating all the time.

It's no big deal but it should be in the rules.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not whining at all. Why are you being a jerk when I am just saying it wasn't posted as a rule? I just said it's fine, I'll pay for it. Don't know why you have to be so instigating all the time.

It's no big deal but it should be in the rules.

 

Ask SAM to throw Romo into the deal...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to make rmw pay for Ward now...

 

Haha it's cool.  I was just starting to get the feeling that bidding for Mack was going to be out of control, and he's much harder to replace.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not whining at all. Why are you being a jerk when I am just saying it wasn't posted as a rule? I just said it's fine, I'll pay for it. Don't know why you have to be so instigating all the time.

It's no big deal but it should be in the rules.

Didn't you just say you weren't going to pay for it?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't you just say you weren't going to pay for it?

 

I didn't think I had to but at the end of the day, it's just a game and it's not worth the trouble because the rules weren't clear. I know what the NFL rule is but we aren't exactly running this with all of the NFL rules. Just selective ones. Which is fine. But whoever wrote the rules should of taken the 2 seconds to write the franchise rules better.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha. I'm not planning to take him

 

You know someone is going to pay a ton for him though. That's why I traded for George Wilson. He can start if I need him to and I can wait until the right SS comes along at the right price. It affords a ton of flexibility.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you rmw for screwing me over

 

Biggest Need:

C

 

Haha you were the one I was most worried about.  With all of that cap space, I had a feeling I wasn't going to be willing to outbid you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least 3 other centers to work with. Plus, can't wisnewski play C?

Yeah but I want him on the left side with Veldheer for the best interest of Bradford

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Adams, OT and Lamarr Woodley, OLB on the block

 

Also willing to take basically anything if you want to secure Ike Taylor or Troy Polamalu before FA

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Adams, OT and Lamarr Woodley, OLB on the block

 

Also willing to take basically anything if you want to secure Ike Taylor or Troy Polamalu before FA

What's Polamalu's cap hit?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites