Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

cushrinada1986

Gary Kubiak's system impact on Ravens personnel?

58 posts in this topic

Given what Kubiak had in Texas, could Kubiaks scheme really help not just our star players but our backup players as well like Pierce's  and  help his production get to a potential probowl level? The run scheme Kubiak had in Texas helped Foster really explode in the running game/Playaction and with the fact that guys like Pierce/pitta are somewhat similar/better to guys he had in Houston like  Foster/Graham, do you think we could have a potential situation with our backups as well as our starters that we had with priest holmes and Jamal Lewis over a decade ago(as an example)?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps because I feel Rice is done and you couldn't make a better offensive system for Pierce. But he needs to stay healthy. He seems always hurt

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All depends on health.  He can thrive in any scheme, but the zone stretch is what he was made for.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we see Pierce take the starting role this season, and he's going to run with it. 

 

I doubt it especially with a  healthy/ more in shape Ray Rice  but I do believe he will have a good season , I can see Rice and Pierce having the same type of season Foster and Tate had in 2011.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it especially with a  healthy/ more in shape Ray Rice  but I do believe he will have a good season , I can see Rice and Pierce having the same type of season Foster and Tate had in 2011.

 

Pierce just has better vision than Rice, and this system is dependent on good vision.

 

We need backs that make one cut and go instead of the five million and two cuts Rice makes before falling into the hole. Pierce is just a better fit schematically. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pierce just has better vision than Rice, and this system is dependent on good vision.

 

We need backs that make one cut and go instead of the five million and two cuts Rice makes before falling into the hole. Pierce is just a better fit schematically. 

They are probably the best duo backs in the league and Gary will prove that hypothesis.  Rice gaining weight lost his elusiveness which was his trademark back in 08.  If Rice can get back to his considered weight and Pierce staying healthy, we are looking at the best ground attack that we all have envisioned awhile ago...

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pierce just has better vision than Rice, and this system is dependent on good vision.

 

We need backs that make one cut and go instead of the five million and two cuts Rice makes before falling into the hole. Pierce is just a better fit schematically. 

 

I always thought Rice had better vision but we shall see.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given what Kubiak had in Texas, could Kubiaks scheme really help Pierce's production get to a potential probowl level? The run scheme Kubiak had in Texas helped Foster really explode in the running game and with the fact that Pierce and Foster are the same size and same type runner, and with Bernard being the faster back, do you think we could have a potential situation with Bernard that we had with priest holmes and Jamal Lewis over a decade ago?

I think by adding Kubiak all aspects of the Ravens' offense should see great improvements and a healthy Pierce will elevate his performance as a result. However, what made Foster so dynamic in Kubiak's system was that he was equally skilled as a receiver. When on the field, there was always a threat of run or pass. That made the scheme so unpredictable and made Foster a Pro Bowl back as a result. Rice will probably see more growth in Kubiak's scheme because of this, but Pierce will elevate his play as well if he works on the passing game's protection reads, hot routes and his hands. I think he will. He has to if he will be used more often..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pierce just has better vision than Rice, and this system is dependent on good vision.

 

We need backs that make one cut and go instead of the five million and two cuts Rice makes before falling into the hole. Pierce is just a better fit schematically. 

 

I don't think this is necessarily true.  I think Pierce has more power to break through bad blocking that Rice, and that's why he was a marginally better running back this year.  But lets not kid ourselves, both running backs performed terribly this year (though it really wasn't their fault).

 

Rice needs good primary blocks to get off the line, and then uses his elusiveness to force missed tackles up the field for big gains.  Pierce is more of a power rusher and has the ability to get yards even when the blocking scheme completely breaks down (which it did on a vast majority of running plays this year).

 

I hate all of the talk that Rice is done (not saying you said this The Raven).  Yes, he had a bad year, but Pierce had a bad year as well.  I think next year, with a large improvement in our ZBS, our running game will be back on track.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Peirce clearly has better vision then Rice from what I see. I think this system fits him perfectly and it'll be huge for his career. The heath concern is a issue because of his running style, but I expect to see a lot more production from BP. He's the future of this backfield and this offense fits his skills to a T. Rice will still be productive though.

I'll tell yo someone else who probably benefits greatly from this system and the hire of Kubiak probably saved his career....Gino G. Kubiak and Dennison turned a 6'4 285lbs Center into a all pro in this sytem. Now yes, Chris Myers is worlds better then Gino right now, but if Gino can take to this system and learn to play with more Leverage, he can certianly thrive in this system.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Peirce clearly has better vision then Rice from what I see. I think this system fits him perfectly and it'll be huge for his career. The heath concern is a issue because of his running style, but I expect to see a lot more production from BP. He's the future of this backfield and this offense fits his skills to a T. Rice will still be productive though.

I'll tell yo someone else who probably benefits greatly from this system and the hire of Kubiak probably saved his career....Gino G. Kubiak and Dennison turned a 6'4 285lbs Center into a all pro in this sytem. Now yes, Chris Myers is worlds better then Gino right now, but if Gino can take to this system and learn to play with more Leverage, he can certianly thrive in this system.

He was beginning to hold up better with blocks toward the end of the year, so I don't doubt he can learn to play with proper technique and hold his own, but what concerns me is that lack of knowledge we have from Gino. He's just routinely out of place and lost in his blocks because he cannot make the right call. Defenses knew they could run stunts, delays, crosses, or anything remotely close to get a sack.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems like Pierce is hurting after every play. Injury is always a concern with him, but if hes healthy he is hard to stop.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given what Kubiak had in Texas, could Kubiaks scheme really help Pierce's production get to a potential probowl level? The run scheme Kubiak had in Texas helped Foster really explode in the running game and with the fact that Pierce and Foster are the same size and same type runner, and with Bernard being the faster back, do you think we could have a potential situation with Bernard that we had with priest holmes and Jamal Lewis over a decade ago?

It's all about the O-line. Also, Pierce needs to become more durable. We can be #1 in rushing if the O-line blocks correctly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Peirce clearly has better vision then Rice from what I see. I think this system fits him perfectly and it'll be huge for his career. The heath concern is a issue because of his running style, but I expect to see a lot more production from BP. He's the future of this backfield and this offense fits his skills to a T. Rice will still be productive though.

I'll tell yo someone else who probably benefits greatly from this system and the hire of Kubiak probably saved his career....Gino G. Kubiak and Dennison turned a 6'4 285lbs Center into a all pro in this sytem. Now yes, Chris Myers is worlds better then Gino right now, but if Gino can take to this system and learn to play with more Leverage, he can certianly thrive in this system.

Gino is at best a back up in this league IMO. His pass blocking got better as the season went on, but his run blocking was pure putrid!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was beginning to hold up better with blocks toward the end of the year, so I don't doubt he can learn to play with proper technique and hold his own, but what concerns me is that lack of knowledge we have from Gino. He's just routinely out of place and lost in his blocks because he cannot make the right call. Defenses knew they could run stunts, delays, crosses, or anything remotely close to get a sack.

Yea I think some of that is the fault of the system and some the fault of Gino. McKinnie said when he left that Castillo's offense required a lot of thinking. It's tough to ask a young player to think more. You usually want young players to think less and just play. But Gino was asked to not only think for himself but also think for the entire oline as well. I think he'll be much better under Castillo in Kubes system and maybe some pointers from Dennison. Everyone should be on the same page so even if he's hearing more then one voice, it's the same message.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gino is at best a back up in this league IMO. His pass blocking got better as the season went on, but his run blocking was pure putrid!!

As was Yanda's and he's an all pro player. The oline as a unit struggled last year and I for one think it's unfair to judge what Gino can or can't be off one season where everything about him was poor or below standards as well.

Also think about this. Wade Smith was a career journeyman before he got into Kubes system 4 years, so I wouldn't be so quick to write off Gino. Just wait and see what he can improve upon first.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He will he is perfect for this system rice might be past his prime and he dances too much in the holes

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I think some of that is the fault of the system and some the fault of Gino. McKinnie said when he left that Castillo's offense required a lot of thinking. It's tough to ask a young player to think more. You usually want young players to think less and just play. But Gino was asked to not only think for himself but also think for the entire oline as well. I think he'll be much better under Castillo in Kubes system and maybe some pointers from Dennison. Everyone should be on the same page so even if he's hearing more then one voice, it's the same message.

Agreed. McKinnie didn't express a need to think alot on and off the field at times and in hind sight, this really could limit him even more as his career goes on. It's good to see that Gino is willing to take-on the challenge of mastering this blocking scheme. I only wish him the best and I hope that attitude resonates with all of our players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I think some of that is the fault of the system and some the fault of Gino. McKinnie said when he left that Castillo's offense required a lot of thinking. It's tough to ask a young player to think more. You usually want young players to think less and just play. But Gino was asked to not only think for himself but also think for the entire oline as well. I think he'll be much better under Castillo in Kubes system and maybe some pointers from Dennison. Everyone should be on the same page so even if he's hearing more then one voice, it's the same message.

 

Actually GIno struggled to command the line.   Yanda basically did it for him @ the later part of the season b/c of that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pierce does remind me somewhat of Arian Foster in that they're both slashing runners. I think it's only a positive for Pierce.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I think some of that is the fault of the system and some the fault of Gino. McKinnie said when he left that Castillo's offense required a lot of thinking. It's tough to ask a young player to think more. You usually want young players to think less and just play. But Gino was asked to not only think for himself but also think for the entire oline as well. I think he'll be much better under Castillo in Kubes system and maybe some pointers from Dennison. Everyone should be on the same page so even if he's hearing more then one voice, it's the same message.

yeah, totally agree...nothing better than every1 on the same page.....

 

Gary will bring the best out of our players....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Pierce can stay healthy, I fully expect him to be a lot more explosive in Kubiak's system. As others have stated, Pierce is a lot like Foster in that they're both "one cut and go" guys. Should be fun!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually GIno struggled to command the line.   Yanda basically did it for him @ the later part of the season b/c of that.

Not sure what you mean by command the line. Yanda was making the calls and recognitions for Gino because Gino didn't see it at all, if that's what you mean.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought I read this system is based less on reading the hole and more on just hitting the line, almost like man blocking. This could bode well for Rice who showed limited vision

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what you mean by command the line. Yanda was making the calls and recognitions for Gino because Gino didn't see it at all, if that's what you mean.

Yep.. thats what i meant... thanks

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As was Yanda's and he's an all pro player. The oline as a unit struggled last year and I for one think it's unfair to judge what Gino can or can't be off one season where everything about him was poor or below standards as well.

Also think about this. Wade Smith was a career journeyman before he got into Kubes system 4 years, so I wouldn't be so quick to write off Gino. Just wait and see what he can improve upon first.

All I'm saying is, there has to be a plan B this year. We can't afford to put all are eggs into one basket. Another way to possibly make him better would be, Solid competition. Not AQ. Shipley! Lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since Kubiak stated in the PC that he will be putting a Ravens offense on the field and will be looking at the strengths of each player, things will get shaken up every where. However, I think that it could be that he will adjust his system to fit with our good/great players such as Joe, Rice, Torrey, Dennis and Marlon (possibly even Jacoby). He is not going to try to fit square pegs into round holes. As to whether Peirce will do better, lets just wait and see how it all shakes out. I believe that Pierce's skills will work better at sometimes but Rice will still play a strong role in the running game with some plays designed around his strengths.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually GIno struggled to command the line.   Yanda basically did it for him @ the later part of the season b/c of that.

Right that was because Gino just wasn't comfortable making those calls imo. Birk said the hardest thing for him to adjust to as a young Center was line calls and adjustments. Depending on the system and how it's coached that could be really tough. I'm not saying this system will turn Gino into a great Center but I think he'll be much more comfortable and sure of himself in year 2. Still think he should compete for the job though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites