Ravens at Texans      Roster      Game Rewind   

Jump to content


Photo

Do you think John Harbaugh can fix the offense by keeping Juan Castillo?


  • Please log in to reply
227 replies to this topic

#1 OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:B-More

Posted 09 January 2014 - 07:43 PM

I think the damage is done. Now it appears the good coaches are getting gone for his screw up. It means lost respect from players. His respect dwindled by getting rid of guys who were outspoken already.
So do you think he can right this offensive ship, or is his ship sinking even further now?
  • 0
DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS!


#2 jazz1988

jazz1988

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,998 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 January 2014 - 07:49 PM

I doubt Harbaugh has lost respect from his players and I doubt that Castillo will ruin the offense. In my opinion the direction of the offense shall be determine by who the offense coordinator will be .


  • 0

#3 The Mom Gene

The Mom Gene

    Hall of Famer

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,725 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:FL, via Owings Mills, MD

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:00 PM

I don't think damage has been done...  Yeah, players were let go... and some might think they were for credible reasons.  It's hard for us fans to realize what's going on behind closed doors...the instability in the locker room.  to measure the disruption that was created...  simply because we had an 8-8 season, doesn't mean that the instability or dissension was worst this year.  To say that lousy play is because of this...  That would be speculation.

 

I'm not going to hold the coaches liable in this context.  I believe that Ed Reed was let go due to a couple of reasons...  his media flubs, his attacks on other players in the public forum, his injuries, the probable surgery, and the possiblity of his not coming back from the injury.  Pollard was a HUGE distraction, and it hasn't only been with the Ravens.  The guy played for 4 teams in 5 years...  That should tell you something.  The list of players goes on... Ellerbe was bought by Miami, Kruger by the Browns, etc.  I think there is much more to this than just "coaches losing players in the locker room this year". The players didn't earn their paychecks this year.  Very few of them anyway.


  • 2

117hd79.jpg


#4 OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:B-More

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:30 PM

I don't think damage has been done...  Yeah, players were let go... and some might think they were for credible reasons.  It's hard for us fans to realize what's going on behind closed doors...the instability in the locker room.  to measure the disruption that was created...  simply because we had an 8-8 season, doesn't mean that the instability or dissension was worst this year.  To say that lousy play is because of this...  That would be speculation.
 
I'm not going to hold the coaches liable in this context.  I believe that Ed Reed was let go due to a couple of reasons...  his media flubs, his attacks on other players in the public forum, his injuries, the probable surgery, and the possiblity of his not coming back from the injury.  Pollard was a HUGE distraction, and it hasn't only been with the Ravens.  The guy played for 4 teams in 5 years...  That should tell you something.  The list of players goes on... Ellerbe was bought by Miami, Kruger by the Browns, etc.  I think there is much more to this than just "coaches losing players in the locker room this year". The players didn't earn their paychecks this year.  Very few of them anyway.


Yeah but..........By keeping Castillo can he fix the offense?
  • 0
DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS!


#5 The Mom Gene

The Mom Gene

    Hall of Famer

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,725 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:FL, via Owings Mills, MD

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:35 PM

Yeah but..........By keeping Castillo can he fix the offense?

Maybe with other changes, yes, there will be improvement...  I am a firm believer in "you don't throw the baby out with the bathwater."  I am with Bisciotti... Give these guys a chance to make corrections. You make the changes that these guys within your coaching staff inside the organization believes is necessary; then if it doesn't correct things, that's when you get drastic.


  • 1

117hd79.jpg


#6 OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:B-More

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:39 PM

Maybe with other changes, yes, there will be improvement...  I am a firm believer in "you don't throw the baby out with the bathwater."  I am with Bisciotti... Give these guys a chance to make corrections. You make the changes that these guys within your coaching staff inside the organization believes is necessary; then if it doesn't correct things, that's when you get drastic.


I dint think he can because there is no plan on offense. Just basic vanilla with no ability to design plays for your playmakers or ability to counter schemes when the opposing defenses stop what you are trying to do
  • 0
DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS!





#7 Jokerraven

Jokerraven

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 965 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ocean City maryland

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:59 PM

The  offense actually was showing promise toward the end of the season. but to answer your question if the playbook changes yes I think the offense can improve. same playbook not using our recievers creatively, and not helping joe get the ball out fast short routes slants,,etc. then no I think we have a repeat of this year.


  • 0

#8 OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:B-More

Posted 09 January 2014 - 09:22 PM

[quote name="Jokerraven" post="1743417" timestamp="1389319179"]The  offense actually was showing promise toward the end of the season. but to answer your question if the playbook changes yes I think the offense can improve. same playbook not using our recievers creatively, and not helping joe get the ball out fast short routes slants,,etc. then no I think we have a repeat of this year.[/quote
] i agree...or it gets worse...I cant tell you how many game day threads I complained how there was no evidence of a short passing game to offset the lack of time Joe had with our line to get rid of the ball. It actually baffled me that with the minds we had they couldnt figure that out..Joe keeps waiting for the deep route and gets killled
  • 0
DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS!


#9 TXRavensFan

TXRavensFan

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 568 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Antonio, TX

Posted 09 January 2014 - 09:25 PM

I don't scapegoat Castillo the way many in these boards like to do, so I can't see any reason why things won't turn around next year.

First and foremost the line will be healthier...Osemele will be back, And Yanda will be another off-season removed from his shoulder surgery. We'll see what happens with Gino and whoever we bring in for competition, but either way, center play should be better too. We should see an improvement at RT as well. Not to mention, they'll have another year to study the blocking schemes.

Rice and Pierce will also have an offseason to heal, which will held the running game. With the line and backs shored up, a lot of pressure will be taken off Joe.

Then we'll be able to open up the play book, especially now that Pitta is playing again. I think that they really went vanilla out of necessity with the injuries to Pitta and Jones and the lack of running game, not to mention the awful play of the line. With those issues fixed, or at least improving, the offense should be much better.
  • 2

Posted Image


#10 The Raven

The Raven

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,621 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 January 2014 - 09:26 PM

I think the damage is done. Now it appears the good coaches are getting gone for his screw up. It means lost respect from players. His respect dwindled by getting rid of guys who were outspoken already.
So do you think he can right this offensive ship, or is his ship sinking even further now?

 

Bisciotti actually said the players started to buy in to Castillo, so no, respect was not lost.

 

ZBS works. Period. Our line just sucked.


  • -2

#11 edthehead

edthehead

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 382 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:atlanta

Posted 09 January 2014 - 09:28 PM

depends on the new OC,he will have more control ,,, only if it's an experienced OC


  • 0




#12 The Mom Gene

The Mom Gene

    Hall of Famer

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,725 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:FL, via Owings Mills, MD

Posted 09 January 2014 - 09:30 PM

I dint think he can because there is no plan on offense. Just basic vanilla with no ability to design plays for your playmakers or ability to counter schemes when the opposing defenses stop what you are trying to do

You can't always say that...  A lot depends on who the O.C. is and who all they bring in to replace the guys that go.


  • 0

117hd79.jpg


#13 Tank 92

Tank 92

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,768 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheltenham, MD

Posted 09 January 2014 - 10:11 PM

yes


  • 0

#14 Ravensfan23

Ravensfan23

    Hall of Famer

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,005 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Baltimore

Posted 09 January 2014 - 10:16 PM

For the people who want to make Castillo out to be the cause for all our problems with the run game and oline, do we ever just stop and think that maybe, just maybe, Gino and A.Q just weren't good enough? Is it possible to think that while playing well, it was a tough adjustment for Monroe to change teams in the middle of a season? Maybe it's possible to think that Oher just had a bad season. How about the possibility that both Rice and Peirce were hurt much more then they lead on, but just like Flacco, they didn't wanna make injury an excuse?

 

Now of course with all this said Castillo changing things from what we won the SB with didn't help, but you don't always see the positive impact of change right away. The oline really started to perform better in run blocking towards the end of the year, the pass blocking was still spotty, but most of the pressure came from guys just flat out getting beat or a call not being made. That is on the players not the coach.

 

I'm willing to bet that if we sign Monroe and get KO back healthy, the left side of the line becomes instantly better. A healthy Yanda is always great and my money is on Wagner at RT. I think that's a pretty good to solid right side, depending on how Ricky plays. Then you upgrade the Center position with either Gino improving or replacing him and I think we have a really good oline.

 

I have no proof, but I think the guys who bucked the changes the most were BMac and Oher. The other issue was that Gino and A.Q just weren't good enough and because of it, we had 3 oline not playing well each game imo.


  • 2

mj5v69.jpg


#15 Jokerraven

Jokerraven

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 965 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ocean City maryland

Posted 09 January 2014 - 10:54 PM

For the people who want to make Castillo out to be the cause for all our problems with the run game and oline, do we ever just stop and think that maybe, just maybe, Gino and A.Q just weren't good enough? Is it possible to think that while playing well, it was a tough adjustment for Monroe to change teams in the middle of a season? Maybe it's possible to think that Oher just had a bad season. How about the possibility that both Rice and Peirce were hurt much more then they lead on, but just like Flacco, they didn't wanna make injury an excuse?

 

Now of course with all this said Castillo changing things from what we won the SB with didn't help, but you don't always see the positive impact of change right away. The oline really started to perform better in run blocking towards the end of the year, the pass blocking was still spotty, but most of the pressure came from guys just flat out getting beat or a call not being made. That is on the players not the coach.

 

I'm willing to bet that if we sign Monroe and get KO back healthy, the left side of the line becomes instantly better. A healthy Yanda is always great and my money is on Wagner at RT. I think that's a pretty good to solid right side, depending on how Ricky plays. Then you upgrade the Center position with either Gino improving or replacing him and I think we have a really good oline.

 

I have no proof, but I think the guys who bucked the changes the most were BMac and Oher. The other issue was that Gino and A.Q just weren't good enough and because of it, we had 3 oline not playing well each game imo.

You and I have discussed things  before and I respect your opinion . I agree about Shipley and Oher . at first yes gino was bad but he played better as the year progress I know everyone said he was undersized . I watched just him at the Texans game . Him alone handled Watt without help on allot of plays and other times he was not physically  overpowered  yes he got beat at times.  Just defending him he wasn't a total disaster all the time. Don't you think a coach with all of the experience Castillo that ,one Gino for all intents and purposes was a rookie, first thing is terminology changes  he throws at him, then scheme changes, then  different blitzes  he is learning for his job that's a steep learning curve he should have known better. Gino also when we played cincy last year( superbowl year) did a good job of handling atkins when he played that's not easy for anyone. I do agree injuries killed us before we played two games but shouldn't he or the oc made scheme adjustments  to compensate for the weakness in the line.

 

and I am curious of what you think about Castillo's statiscal history. lead the league in sacks for 7 years under his watch.I would like to hear your input and  thoughts on that .


Edited by Jokerraven, 09 January 2014 - 11:04 PM.

  • 0

#16 Ravenseconbeast

Ravenseconbeast

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,964 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gaithersburg

Posted 09 January 2014 - 11:16 PM

For the people who want to make Castillo out to be the cause for all our problems with the run game and oline, do we ever just stop and think that maybe, just maybe, Gino and A.Q just weren't good enough? Is it possible to think that while playing well, it was a tough adjustment for Monroe to change teams in the middle of a season? Maybe it's possible to think that Oher just had a bad season. How about the possibility that both Rice and Peirce were hurt much more then they lead on, but just like Flacco, they didn't wanna make injury an excuse?

 

Now of course with all this said Castillo changing things from what we won the SB with didn't help, but you don't always see the positive impact of change right away. The oline really started to perform better in run blocking towards the end of the year, the pass blocking was still spotty, but most of the pressure came from guys just flat out getting beat or a call not being made. That is on the players not the coach.

 

I'm willing to bet that if we sign Monroe and get KO back healthy, the left side of the line becomes instantly better. A healthy Yanda is always great and my money is on Wagner at RT. I think that's a pretty good to solid right side, depending on how Ricky plays. Then you upgrade the Center position with either Gino improving or replacing him and I think we have a really good oline.

 

I have no proof, but I think the guys who bucked the changes the most were BMac and Oher. The other issue was that Gino and A.Q just weren't good enough and because of it, we had 3 oline not playing well each game imo.

 

What about Yanda & Oher?  They didn't play well either...Also our 2 pro backs...I also realize our TE/FB lost their touch on blocking assignment too.

Basically anything Castillo was assigned to 'coincidentally' had the worst performance in Ravens history.   We also achieved getting the our QB sacked the most in ravens history.   

The best move Ravens could've done was to take a step back and find the best Oline coach.   We have the whole offseason to do it.   Plently of time to be patient and find the right guy.   Instead, Harbaugh stepped in and basically secured his BFF job as soon as the season was over.

 

At the end, whether this move sucks or not, its already been decided and done with.   

 

Harbaugh just has to know that if this area (Oline & run game) becomes a disaster again, its not only Castillo who gets canned but Harbaugh's job is on the line too.      


Edited by Ravenseconbeast, 09 January 2014 - 11:19 PM.

  • 1




#17 OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:B-More

Posted 09 January 2014 - 11:17 PM

You can't always say that...  A lot depends on who the O.C. is and who all they bring in to replace the guys that go.


Its Caldwell, Until otherwise. Castillo is the instrument of Harbaugh. Together its uninspiring.
  • 0
DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS!


#18 OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:B-More

Posted 09 January 2014 - 11:22 PM

Btw...Am I allowed to comment on the Palamolo pic on the top of the screen in a Ravens forum? At least give us some graffiti tools in here
  • 0
DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS!


#19 Ravensfan23

Ravensfan23

    Hall of Famer

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,005 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Baltimore

Posted 09 January 2014 - 11:29 PM

You and I have discussed things  before and I respect your opinion . I agree about Shipley and Oher . at first yes gino was bad but he played better as the year progress I know everyone said he was undersized . I watched just him at the Texans game . Him alone handled Watt without help on allot of plays and other times he was not physically  overpowered  yes he got beat at times.  Just defending him he wasn't a total disaster all the time. Don't you think a coach with all of the experience Castillo that ,one Gino for all intents and purposes was a rookie, first thing is terminology changes  he throws at him, then scheme changes, then  different blitzes  he is learning for his job that's a steep learning curve he should have known better. Gino also when we played cincy last year( superbowl year) did a good job of handling atkins when he played that's not easy for anyone. I do agree injuries killed us before we played two games but shouldn't he or the oc made scheme adjustments  to compensate for the weakness in the line.

 

and I am curious of what you think about Castillo's statiscal history. lead the league in sacks for 7 years under his watch.I would like to hear your input and  thoughts on that .

 

First off let me start with Gino. I like him. Did he struggle, yes but as you pointed out there was a lot that went into it, not just talent. With that said, I'd definitely make him compete for his job, but with that said, I actually think he'd win. Some guys are plug and play, while others take 2-3 years to truely develop. Next year will be Gino's 3rd in the NFL.

 

As for Castillo, I wasn't aware of his stats as a coach. At the end of the day, just like with any coach, I think he's at the mercy of his players for the most part. Because he can only teach and coach so much, before eventually those players have to perform. What type of players did he have when all those sacks were given up? What was the offensive system? I know just watching the Eagles I saw plenty of times that McNabb would miss a hot read. So does the sack come from QB/WR error or the oline. This year I noticed our blocking scheme called for our RBs and WRs to help up a lot in pass pro. We really struggled in that area. Was it a result of the actual scheme, or did our backs just have a problem picking up the scheme?

 

A lot of times this year our guys just looked confused when it came to pass blocking. I gotta think that's a result of guys just not being confident in what they were asked to do. So i guess to answer your question, i'd say I base my opinions on what I can actually see with my eyes, because there are far too many variable when you are looking at stats alone. Castillo has a complex pass pro scheme, that involves the TEs, RBs and WRs. If everyone is on the same page it seems to work, when they are not, watch out.


  • 1

mj5v69.jpg


#20 Ravensfan23

Ravensfan23

    Hall of Famer

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,005 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Baltimore

Posted 09 January 2014 - 11:46 PM

What about Yanda & Oher?  They didn't play well either...Also our 2 pro backs...I also realize our TE/FB lost their touch on blocking assignment too.

Basically anything Castillo was assigned to 'coincidentally' had the worst performance in Ravens history.   We also achieved getting the our QB sacked the most in ravens history.   

The best move Ravens could've done was to take a step back and find the best Oline coach.   We have the whole offseason to do it.   Plently of time to be patient and find the right guy.   Instead, Harbaugh stepped in and basically secured his BFF job as soon as the season was over.

 

At the end, whether this move sucks or not, its already been decided and done with.   

 

Harbaugh just has to know that if this area (Oline & run game) becomes a disaster again, its not only Castillo who gets canned but Harbaugh's job is on the line too.      

 

Basically what you are suggesting is exactly what happened. The Ravens added one of the game's best oline coaches in Castillo to the team last season. It's not like Castillo was some college coach that Harbs gave a shot too, or like Castillo was hard pressed to find a job, he actually turned down jobs to come here. The guy is widely considered a really good to great oline coach.

 

For as much as people wanna believe that BMac bashed Castillo on his way out of town he didn't. He actually gave a really good, honest insight to what was going on, but most people just took that as an opportunity to say how bad Castillo was. If you can(or even want to) go back and read McKinnie's comments. He talks about how Castillo is a really good coach, but his scheme requires a lot of thinking and all the players just didn't learn at the same pace.

 

If you piece together the BMac article and what Mr B. had to say about Castillo you can easily see(or at least i do) that he was just the pain of change the Ravens dealt with. Castillo saw area's where the Ravens could improve and attacked it hard, while the mostly veteran oline bucked against those changes because it wasn't what they were used to. Yes Yanda struggled towards the beginning of the year, but towards the end, Yanda and Monroe where our best two linemen.

 

As for the running game, when you have a oline that struggles your running game and offense as a whole will struggle. With a new blocking system that's tough to learn and adjust to, plus the injuries and personnel changes it's no surprise to me that the oline struggled. Also just like Flacco, but Rice and BP pressed a lot and tried way too hard at times. It was just a bad deal and yes it was heavily caused by Castillo changing things, but that doesn't mean that it wasn't a change for the better. It's tough to adapt to change, especially when you are coming from what appeared to be success.

 

Also with Harbs, it doesn't matter if he fired Castillo and promoted Washington to be the oline coach. If the oline struggles again next season it's his butt regardless.


  • 3

mj5v69.jpg





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users