I'm assuming you meant to say "John has cost us two games...."
In my opinion John has cost us to games consecutively if not benefited in large part to us losing them, but as stupid as i've found these calls, i've got to say i found the onside kick to be the the most stupid. Why do an onside kick with a much larger chance of failing than instead of going for it after Troy jumped offsides on the field goal which would have placed us at the one yard line?
Did you mean to say field goal? That was an extra point attempt. You think they should have gone for 2pts? Not sure how that would have helped matters.
Not sure that he cost us a game today. I personally didn't care for the decision, but they only got 3 points. Better that, than for them to have a 10 minute long drive leaving only 2 mins for us to attempt to tie. You're assuming that if there was no onside kick, Pitt would not have scored 3 points and they would have punted the ball back to us. How do you get to that conclusion?
Edited by easternshore97, 20 October 2013 - 09:04 PM.