Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

chappers11

Safety Jarius Byrd wants to be traded - should we get him?

60 posts in this topic

I think this is a situation where if we can afford him we don't want him and if we want him we cannot afford him.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I take back my original opinion, we NEED him.

So whats the price?


Can't even afford him, so it's not going to happen.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't even afford him, so it's not going to happen.

 

 

Yeah I know, we're already right up against next years cap limit with a half dozen key players to re-sign.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think saftey might be our biggest need on defense. id get rid of jacoby. also i cant see both ngata an suggs here nect yer. maybe even rice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i say we move buff to corner with byrd at saftey. he is a lockdown player. im certain 2 touchdowns would have been avoided if we had byrd yesterday.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do we need a new safety all of a sudden? Did I miss something?

 

Huff could move to Corner and put Byrd at Safety. either way it won't happen but it's nice to dream.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still want us to sign Kerry Rhodes. Especially after what I saw last night. Please, Ozzie. Sign the guy.

 

I'm all for Rhodes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's still quite a few decent quality FA Safeties.

 

Rhodes would be nice, but there's other pretty solid guys around, such as Atari Bigby, Quintin Mikell, Sherrod Martin, Corey Lynch, Jordan Babineaux, Madieu Williams and Gerald Sensabaugh.

 

Can't hurt to bring a few in for a try out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still want us to sign Kerry Rhodes. Especially after what I saw last night. Please, Ozzie. Sign the guy.

Rhodes is another SS type with limitations in coverage.  I said it last night somewhere but it makes more sense to play Elam and Ihedigbo together and crack skulls if we're going to give up 49 with Huff flailing his gitch out there like a handkerchief.  At least Elam and Ihedigbo will knock some fools out while giving up 49 and then maybe we'll get the other team to where the Patriots were last year in the AFCCG when they saw Ridley unconscious.  They didn't want any after that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huff isn't a good enough CB to see the field as a CB.

his skill are more suited to cb. he isnt a ball hawk. byrd is. thats what we lacked yesterday .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

meh. we cant afford squat. im looking at this team. our cap issues. age of our better players. this is going to be a 4 year rebuilding plan.thanks joe. 

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

meh. we cant afford squat. im looking at this team. our cap issues. age of our better players. this is going to be a 4 year rebuilding plan.thanks joe. 

That's... incredibly inaccurate.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's... incredibly inaccurate.

o really. well the best idea would be to get rid of suggs and ngata next year. replace them with trade or through draft and then sign or trade some other teams weapons. to be honest ngata hasnt taken that extra step since his new contract.

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodes is another SS type with limitations in coverage. I said it last night somewhere but it makes more sense to play Elam and Ihedigbo together and crack skulls if we're going to give up 49 with Huff flailing his gitch out there like a handkerchief. At least Elam and Ihedigbo will knock some fools out while giving up 49 and then maybe we'll get the other team to where the Patriots were last year in the AFCCG when they saw Ridley unconscious. They didn't want any after that.

What? Rhodes played free safety with the cardinals and looked good in coverage.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What? Rhodes played free safety with the cardinals and looked good in coverage.

He did?  I remember him New York and I thought he looked more like a SS playing with Rex.  Besides, isn't Rhodes kind of a boob?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

o really. well the best idea would be to get rid of suggs and ngata next year. replace them with trade or through draft and then sign or trade some other teams weapons. to be honest ngata hasnt taken that extra step since his new contract.

He was pretty dominating inside last night.  He's been hurt the last two years and last year played out of position to help the rush D protect Ray because the rest of the line sucked.  Ngata when healthy is a top 3 DT in the league.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He did? I remember him New York and I thought he looked more like a SS playing with Rex. Besides, isn't Rhodes kind of a boob?

He's a good player and he can make plays. He's the type of safety we need right now.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a good player and he can make plays. He's the type of safety we need right now.

One thing's for sure after watching Huff in the preseason and last night he's not the safety that should be on the backend.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Costs too much and he has a plantar fascia injury... pass.

Wait a second.... another Bills player with a foot injury?  Ok, Ok, this changes the game, I switch from yea to nay. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites