Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Admin 3

Preseason 4 - Baltimore Ravens at St. Louis Rams

883 posts in this topic

Said it earlier and I'll say it now: How are we supposed to evaluate our receivers with Hanie in?

 

Yeah, a lot of us asked it, no answer came.

 

bio

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Said it earlier and I'll say it now: How are we supposed to evaluate our receivers with Hanie in?

 

Well, the coaches can still go back and watch the film to evaluate their release, route running, blocking, and ability to get open.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Said it earlier and I'll say it now: How are we supposed to evaluate our receivers with Hanie in?

 

We aren't really evaluating tonight, to be honest.  i'm sure they already know who's making the team.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm no longer convinced Clark is a lock to make the roster. He simply has not looked good.

 

Agreed.  His hands have yet to get going and that's all he's good for nowadays.  The Ravens seem to really like Frustenburg and Dickson is back healthy.  I still think Clark makes it, but it wouldn't surprise me if he didn't.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is incredibly hard to watch 

 

Any preseason game in Week 4 is hard to watch. I don't know about you but I'd much rather be seeing the Ravens/Broncos game now but I get that starting the NFL Season along with the start of college football won't go over well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sucks seeing Rams receivers get tons of chances to make plays while Hanie is taking a big fat crap on every opportunity. Crist can't be any worse.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Said it earlier and I'll say it now: How are we supposed to evaluate our receivers with Hanie in?

Preseason game #4 is too late for stuff like that. They've made up thir minds already, I think.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Said it earlier and I'll say it now: How are we supposed to evaluate our receivers with Hanie in?

 

We aren't.  No.  But my guess is that the coaches have already made up their minds about who stays and goes.  They are good with their evaluations.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they already decided on WRs and that's why Hanie is in the game - to manage the run game

 

... or is it that he's our only deployable QB right now. Flacco is evidently out, no sane HC risks his starting QB the last pre-season game. Taylor's too important to risk, too. So, we're stuck with Hanie and Crist...

 

bio

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.  His hands have yet to get going and that's all he's good for nowadays.  The Ravens seem to really like Frustenburg and Dickson is back healthy.  I still think Clark makes it, but it wouldn't surprise me if he didn't.  

 

Considering the fact that Pitta and Dickson both are heading into contract years, I'd take a young Furstenburg over the over-the-hill and struggling Clark.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ravens should try to work a trade for Rainey. I think otherwise they will take the high road and "cut" him so he can go get playing time somewhere

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We aren't.  No.  But my guess is that the coaches have already made up their minds about who stays and goes.  They are good with their evaluations.  

I hope that's the case.   LOL

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering the fact that Pitta and Dickson both are heading into contract years, I'd take a young Furstenburg over the over-the-hill and struggling Clark.

 

So would I.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hanie isn't suited for the NFL

 

Well, he was good enough for the Bears.  Not saying much, is it.......

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites