Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest

Week 14 - Washington Redskins At Baltimore Ravens

1,006 posts in this topic

[quote name='ravens world' post='99859' date='Dec 7 2008, 09:47 PM']its not the secondary its rex blitzing so many people that if he gets it to the rb quick he makes a person miss theres nobody else to catch him cause everybody blitzed he needs to stop so much blitzing on 3rd down he doesnt have to make everybody blitz[/quote]

Again, we've had two safeties this year and the Redskins offensive line is very, very bad. We were close to getting to Campbell and I'm going to be on our defense all day over Jason Campbell.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At first, I was about to curse at Ed Reed for fair-catching that punt.

But then, looking at how the ball was dropping, I don't think it would've bounced for a touchback. So, I can't fault him.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
this game is boring know ima play some cod4 or some madden im bored but nice 14 point lead at the half should have been 28 to 0 but 14 to 0 is not bad lol
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Redskins are going to get some points eventually, we need to put up a touchdown coming out of the half.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Redskins are going to get some points eventually, we need to put up a touchdown coming out of the half.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='ravens world' post='99880' date='Dec 7 2008, 09:51 PM']wow why not hurry up offense[/quote]

We don't wanna get greedy now, do we?

I mean, that's how some games are lost; teams will try to pour it on when they have a reasonably comfortable lead, and end up blowing it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='theFRANCHISE' post='99886' date='Dec 7 2008, 09:52 PM']We don't wanna get greedy now, do we?

I mean, that's how some games are lost; teams will try to pour it on when they have a reasonably comfortable lead, and end up blowing it.[/quote]

Thats a losers mentality. You play to win the game.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='theFRANCHISE' post='99886' date='Dec 7 2008, 09:52 PM']We don't wanna get greedy now, do we?

I mean, that's how some games are lost; teams will try to pour it on when they have a reasonably comfortable lead, and end up blowing it.[/quote]
Logic and reason are lost on him
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='CP`C-Pain`CP' post='99885' date='Dec 7 2008, 09:52 PM']Well interesting first half....Lets not come out dull after half time.[/quote]

For some reason, I get the feeling that we'll be seeing some creativity in the second half.

After all, the Redskins may not be expecting it; judging by how vanilla the offense has been thus far, I wouldn't be surprised if this is meant to lull Washington to sleep on defense.

Once the 'Skins are worn down a bit to start the half, I can see a little bit of gadgetry. Nothing too groundbreaking like the receiver option or Flacco catching a 40+ yard pass, but something "interesting."
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think they need to figure out what they're doing , no need to get greedy and risk a turn over.

Go Ravens!

[img]http://homepage.mac.com/jeffade/img/poe_reaper.png[/img]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='neepo13' post='99888' date='Dec 7 2008, 09:53 PM']Thats a losers mentality. You play to win the game.[/quote]
Don't take his side
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='neepo13' post='99888' date='Dec 7 2008, 09:53 PM']Thats a losers mentality. You play to win the game.[/quote]

But with the ball deep in your own territory, and with little time left on the clock, there's no need to try to tack on more points before the half, with the lead.

Especially since we get the ball back to start the second half.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.