Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

RavenFan28105

Best Postseason games in the past decade

14 posts in this topic

Steelers over Cards would be number one.  -_- I like how he mentions Ben making all the throws when needed but not all the bad calls in favor of the Steelers. When the refs publicly apologize for their calls, it cant be one of the best games of the post season of the last decade.

 

I agree with some of the others as they were groundbreaking in their own regard, and Imma let you finish Adam, but the Ravens vs Broncos was one of the best post season games of all time!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No specific order but, patriots-giants 07, packers-cards 2009, saints-49ers 2011, of course ravens-Denver last year. Our Super Bowl as well.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Arizona/Green Bay 2009 game was pretty crazy, but it wasn't so much great offense as it was sloppy defense. Everyone was wide open and running for crazy YAC.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Arizona/Green Bay 2009 game was pretty crazy, but it wasn't so much great offense as it was sloppy defense. Everyone was wide open and running for crazy YAC.

Well, one of the funnest games I've ever watched. I know the game ended on great defense, but your right. Just an offensive clinic
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any game that has team he likes in it lol

I would think something that has a lot of intrigue and suspense...like a double overtime game maybe?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I really liked about that article is what is mentioned at the bottom:

Adam Rank has never won an award. For anything. We don't mean to be harsh, but it's true. You can follow him on Twitter @adamrank. Oh, and if you liked this (right!), check him out on the latest "Dave Dameshek Football Program". Which, come to think of it won an award. So Rank has won something meaningful. Yes, meaningful unlike this latest post. Am I right? But follow him on Twitter, please. He's taking us to lunch if he gets 25 more Twitter followers today.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rank is one of the worst sports writers I have ever seen. Other than that Chase guy who works/worked for YahooSports, there is no one worse than he is. I've given up reading any of his blogs because he is so far off the truth that it isn't even funny. Its like he doesn't even watch the game.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I really liked about that article is what is mentioned at the bottom:

Adam Rank has never won an award. For anything. We don't mean to be harsh, but it's true. You can follow him on Twitter @adamrank. Oh, and if you liked this (right!), check him out on the latest "Dave Dameshek Football Program". Which, come to think of it won an award. So Rank has won something meaningful. Yes, meaningful unlike this latest post. Am I right? But follow him on Twitter, please. He's taking us to lunch if he gets 25 more Twitter followers today.

 

Judging by the fact that he hardly even follows the game, let alone reads his own site (forget about proofreading his articles. Why proofread a bunch of steaming crap??), he probably doesn't even know that the disclaimer is down there at the bottom of his articles. That's how sad it is.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
html Managers who use my pre-employment tests, interview training, or attend my speeches often ask me,3. You get even more in-depth applicant evaluation by adding Steps 47. Of course, change the order of steps to suit your company.STEP 1 = BRIEF INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW (BISI)BISI uncovers job-related bio-data or biographical data. This gives you objective data you can uncover in a 15-minute phone or in-person BISI.How do you start? Make [url=http://www.gucci-japan.net/]L[/url] a list of bio-data similarities of your best employees in a job. For example, let's say your best employees (a) held jobs during high school (HS), (b) post-HS worked only 1 or 2 full-time jobs before applying at your company, and (c) held each post-HS job two or more years.Voila! You quickly screen-in applicants who have those three (a, b,c) bio-data, and eliminate applicants who do not have those three bio-data.If the applicant’s bio-data is similar to your best employees, then you can continue to Step 2 = Pre-Employment Tests.STEP 2 = PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTSBig research projects prove pre-employment tests are the most accurate method to predictor forecast -- an applicant's success or failure. Tests are far better at predicting job success than interviews or other prediction methods. So, make sure your applicants take pre-employment tests.You need to use the correct pre-employment test. You test applicants for skilled, professional or supervisory jobs, using pre-employment tests that predictor forecastboth (a) intelligence plus (b) job behavior, like interpersonal skills, personality, and motivations. For applicants for lower-level, unskilled and semi-skilled jobs, you give applicants a test to forecast three crucial dependability concerns: (a) work ethic, (b) theft/stealing, and (c) substance abuse.Importantly, always conduct ato customize intelligence and [url=http://www.era001.com/][/url] behavior tests before you start testing job applicants. That will identify the test [url=http://www.evreng.com/][/url] scores that indicate an applicant is likely to succeed in your company. Ask an industrial psychologist how you efficiently customize tests via benchmarking.If the applicant gets good scores on the pre-employment test, then definitely do Step 3 = In-Depth Interview.STEP 3 = IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWSHorrible news: Research shows most interviewers are terrible at predicting if an applicant will succeed or fail. So, never use only a job interview to make hiring decisions. Here are tips to help you interview better.Start by listing 6-9 job-related qualities you absolutely must find in the person you hire. Use your list to create an interview formto help you ask the applicant about each quality, and have room to take notes.Beware: Never tell the applicant the qualities you are looking for. For example, if one of the 6-9 key qualities is teamwork, do not ask, "Do you like or do well with teamwork?" Instead, ask an indirect question like "What did you like most in jobs you had? Also, what did you like least?" Listen carefully. An applicant who likes teamwork will ooh-&-ahh about collaborating and working with people. An applicant who dislikes teamwork will not mention such activities.If the applicant impresses you in the In-Depth Interview, then proceed to Step 4.STEP 4 = ROLE-PLAY or WORK SIMULATIONWould you buy a used car without first driving it? Of course not!Well, job applicants are 'used cars.’ Every applicant tells you they can do the job. But do not believe it until you make the applicant show you key job skills via role-playing.For example, with a sales rep applicant, you can act as a prospective customer, while the applicant pretends to be a sales rep. Use a checklist to identify what sales skills the applicant does and does not display. For an admin assistant job, have the applicant do admin work you will require on-the-job, such as typing, computer use, and spreadsheets.If the applicant does well in this, then move on to Step 5.STEP 5 = REALISTIC JOB OBSERVATION (RJO)Although the applicant did well in Steps 14, you must discover if the applicant truly desires to do required job tasks. How? Have the applicant spend 2-4 hours tagging along with, and observing, one of your employees doing the job. For instance, a sales applicant should spend 4 hours watching one of your sales reps. Or, a laborer applicant could spend half a shift observing one of your company’s laborers. After this RJO, find out if the applicant actually would like doing the job duties.Research revealed giving applicants a [url=http://www.evreng.com/][/url] RJO results in (a) less applicants accepting a job offer, but (b) applicants who accept a job offer are less likely to turnover. Reason: They saw first-hand what they would do on-the-job and want to do it.STEP 6 = REFERENCEBACKGROUND CHECKSFor an applicant still in the running after Steps 15, doa. Reference Checkscalling the applicant’s ex-bossesb. Background Checksfinding job-related records, e.g., criminal, credit, and drivingSTEP 7 = ONE EXECUTIVE APPROVES HIRING DECISIONSHiring productive employees is ultra-important to a company's profits and growth. As a safeguard, give a specified executive data you collected in Steps 16. Then, the executive can (a) approve hiring an applicant rated excellent on Steps 16, and (b) refuse to hire an applicant who rated only low on Steps 16.RECOMMENDATIONS TO HELP YOU HIRE THE BESTYou now have seven great methods to discover if the applicant has qualities you need in the person you hire. Definitely use the first three stepsBISI, pre-employment tests, and in-depth interview. To be even more careful, you also can use the last four steps.Some managers worry about how much time this will take. Answer: Anywhere from five minutes for a lousy applicant who bombs the BISI to a few hours for an applicant who does all seven steps.Ask yourself: How much time, energy and money do you waste when you hire the wrong applicant? And how much is it worth to you when you hire the best?COPYRIGHT 2008 MICHAEL MERCER, [url=http://www.evreng.com/]L[/url] PH.D.,MERCER SYSTEMS, INC. [url=http://33forum.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=46799]Gucci Australia7lessen Coach Handbags Pick Whole In A Teacher Retailer Trap Put by[/url] [url=http://metequipmentusa.com/forums/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=14437]Designer Handbags- Exclusive Varieties At Affordable Rates[/url] [url=http://fame718.com/forums/index.php/topic/198-need-to-have-web-hosting-advice-your-search-is-over/page__gopid__1060#entry1060]Tom Ford Malignant Orchid Is On the verge of For Its Close-Up[/url] !ENDVALUE!
0

Share this post


Link to post