Preston: Harbaugh Clearing Out Mutineers
#1
Posted 13 March 2013 - 02:48 PM
#2
Posted 13 March 2013 - 02:48 PM
Edited by dhstandard, 13 March 2013 - 02:51 PM.
#3
Posted 13 March 2013 - 02:51 PM
"No weapon. No weapon formed against this team shall prosper.” #GoRavens
Win or lose, I believe.
#4
Posted 13 March 2013 - 02:55 PM
Agree that this is Harbaugh's team, disagree in your choice of words - "mutineers." There was never any mutiny on this team against John. Disagreeing but respectfully discussing the matter with the coach is very healthy.. and that's what the Ravens did late in the regular season.
Also, why did Preston state that Boldin was a "rabble-rouser?" Makes no sense.

#5
Posted 13 March 2013 - 02:59 PM
#6
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:00 PM
#7
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:02 PM
So according to Preston...Harbaugh wants the outspoken people off the team..anyone that may even remotely question something...
But those same players helped get harbaugh a championship...because those players were good.
So John would remove good players off this team that are outspoken? That's stupid.
I don't see why Ozzie would allow this...
#8
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:05 PM
Remember when Preston said Ray and Ed couldn't play in 2011?? Now Ray's retirement and Ed's potential departure are Harbaugh's ego. Get out, troll!

"Bring it. They want physical. They want to run against us. You know we'll be there."
#9
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:07 PM
Hilarious contradiction. All of those players were players John Harbaugh has brought in, re-signed, and publicly stood up for (most times combating what Preston says)
Remember when Preston said Ray and Ed couldn't play in 2011?? Now Ray's retirement and Ed's potential departure are Harbaugh's ego. Get out, troll!
Thank you!!!!!
Couldnt agree more

If a tree falls down in the woods and no one is around to hear it, do the Steelers still suck?
Vandelay Industries GM
"We're importers-exporters"
#10
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:11 PM
It doesn't make sense because it isn't true.Interesting....
So according to Preston...Harbaugh wants the outspoken people off the team..anyone that may even remotely question something...
But those same players helped get harbaugh a championship...because those players were good.
So John would remove good players off this team that are outspoken? That's stupid.
I don't see why Ozzie would allow this...
#11
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:18 PM
Interesting....
So according to Preston...Harbaugh wants the outspoken people off the team..anyone that may even remotely question something...
But those same players helped get harbaugh a championship...because those players were good.
So John would remove good players off this team that are outspoken? That's stupid.
I don't see why Ozzie would allow this...
The only reason I could agree is cause the team knows it's about to get younger. Last year there were a decent amount of vets/people who had only worked with Harbaugh. With youner guys being brought in maybe he doesn't want the older guys influencing them and wants them to buy in.
On the article, why did he have to say Suggs is gone? He has no idea how the team works.
Edited by redrum52, 13 March 2013 - 03:22 PM.
#12
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:19 PM
quoted for truthHilarious contradiction. All of those players were players John Harbaugh has brought in, re-signed, and publicly stood up for (most times combating what Preston says)
Remember when Preston said Ray and Ed couldn't play in 2011?? Now Ray's retirement and Ed's potential departure are Harbaugh's ego. Get out, troll!
#13
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:28 PM
#14
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:28 PM
maybe the guys were outspoken about the money being spread around or something? Might be annoying trying to get your 1/52nd of the cake when flacco's got 1/6th of it.
Yeah, must be it....
#15
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:29 PM
#16
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:35 PM
Yeah, must be it....
I'm just saying a lot of those guys are looking for their first pay day or their last big one, and suddenly with Flacco's contract their financial prospects look a little more limited than they may like down the road. I know Flacco's contract only carries a 6.8 million dollar cap hit this year, but its going to go up and up and up. They all have rings now, the next goal is get as much money as you can before you retire, or get hurt. Just an idea I'm as confused as everyone else.
#17
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:37 PM
My eyeballs popped out of their sockets from the eye roll I just made regarding your comment.maybe the guys were outspoken about the money being spread around or something? Might be annoying trying to get your 1/52nd of the cake when flacco's got 1/6th of it.
#18
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:38 PM
You're joking..... right?Boldin was traded to the 49ers to help Jim the same reason we relased Pollard!! Watch he will end up with the 49ers also.John feels like he ows Jim and wants him to win the next Super Bowl.Reed is next to leave!!!
#19
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:38 PM
I'm just saying a lot of those guys are looking for their first pay day or their last big one, and suddenly with Flacco's contract their financial prospects look a little more limited than they may like down the road. I know Flacco's contract only carries a 6.8 million dollar cap hit this year, but its going to go up and up and up. They all have rings now, the next goal is get as much money as you can before you retire, or get hurt. Just an idea I'm as confused as everyone else.
Every team wishes for a franchise QB (and reluctantly, the salary that goes along with it). We knew Kruger was gonna get overpaid. Ellerbe at $35M is insane. Boldin is a bummer, but I get it. I hate it, but I get it. Pollard is a head scratcher, but NOT due to money. We "save" $1M this year (yes, more in 2014, but why not release him then?). These moves all have nothing/little to do with Flaccos contract.
Edited by 1/28/01, 13 March 2013 - 03:41 PM.
#20
Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:40 PM
Losers always say "Next time's gonna be different!". That's right, next time you're gonna lose again.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















