[News] Late For Work 2/28: Terrell Suggs Sounds Off
#1
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:02 AM
View the full article
#2
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:39 AM
#3
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:41 AM
#4
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:44 AM
I don't think the team should or will panic just because they lost Lewis. A DT, a DE or safety would be much better picks at 32 and considering the depth of this years draft trading down might be an even better choice.
Edited by PolishRifle, 28 February 2013 - 09:45 AM.
#5
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:48 AM
#6
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:49 AM
#7
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:52 AM
#8
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:56 AM
#9
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:57 AM
Whenever someone needs to send a "string of tweets" based upon one remark that you made, you know that you've got to them mentally. Suggs didn't make any plays against you Davis because he was mostly lined up on Staley's side, letting Kruger beat you all game punk. And as far as being a "loser" before the NFL? Tell that to the man who still hold the record for most sacks in a season in NCAA history.
Edited by Corvus, 28 February 2013 - 10:06 AM.
#10
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:00 AM
Suggs is great. It's like he says what I think.
Also, to whoever runs the website: Would it be possible to make the links open in new tabs? I mean, this is 2013. I couldn't tell you the amount of times I look at a twitpic and then accidentally close the window as opposed to coming back to the website. I don't know if anyone else has this problem, but it would be something to look into.
#11
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:07 AM
#12
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:08 AM
Then again, upon further review... go get em boy!!!
#13
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:09 AM
Google "Palmer Rule". Both it and the Brady rule are just modifications of an older rule.I dunno how accurate it is that 31 teams hate the Patriots (though i wouldn't doubt it) but Sizzle is absolutely right about Brady's preferential treatment. Where was that rule when the Steelers took Palmer out in the playoffs that year? Then 3 years later, Brady is out for the season so they make a rule change. Suspicious at all?
#14
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:12 AM
He'll be allowed to test the open market. The Ravens may or may not offer him a deal based on what he's offered by other teams. It'll be the same for everyone but Flacco, unless his deal gets done in the next three days.Does this mean Michael Oher and Kelechi Osemele are going our tackles next year? I don't know if the coaches know this yet, but Oher is one of the best RT in the league
#15
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:13 AM
#16
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:15 AM
#17
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:17 AM
#18
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:18 AM
#19
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:23 AM
Wish Ben Grubbs would have given the FO a chance to match the Saint offer, but B-Mac should know his worth coming in to negotiations!
Now, if the Pats earnestly want Raven defenders, let them have Cary Williams!
Like they found with Adaleus Thomas, they will soon learn that he's not the same player away from our scheme and locker room!
Edited by Mystigo_Dragon, 28 February 2013 - 10:25 AM.
#20
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:24 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















