Tom Brady Extension
#1
Posted 25 February 2013 - 04:38 PM
It puts the Pats in great cap position through 2017.
http://sportsillustr...riots-contract/
Hopefully, this helps the Ravens a bit in their negotiations with Joe. If Tom can take considerably less than market value, maybe Joe does too.
Reloaded

#2
Posted 25 February 2013 - 04:39 PM
#3
Posted 25 February 2013 - 04:46 PM
That's what I think/hope.Fat chance. Joes gonna get paid. Although maybe SLIGHTLY less after this. Maybe.

#4
Posted 25 February 2013 - 04:48 PM
Losers always say "Next time's gonna be different!". That's right, next time you're gonna lose again.
#5
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:01 PM
#6
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:02 PM
Depending on how they restructured his salary this year (if they did) it may lower the franchise tag number.The Patriots just extended Tom Brady for 3 more years at an astronomically low 27M.
It puts the Pats in great cap position through 2017.
http://sportsillustr...riots-contract/
Hopefully, this helps the Ravens a bit in their negotiations with Joe. If Tom can take considerably less than market value, maybe Joe does too.
#7
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:06 PM
It's too bad we won't be able to re-sign Joe at that little money.
#8
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:15 PM
The Patriots just extended Tom Brady for 3 more years at an astronomically low 27M.
It puts the Pats in great cap position through 2017.
http://sportsillustr...riots-contract/
Hopefully, this helps the Ravens a bit in their negotiations with Joe. If Tom can take considerably less than market value, maybe Joe does too.
....Tom Brady has already gotten paid, has endorsements out of his backside, and is at the tail end of his career where his only desire is to bring another Lombardi to New England. This is Joe's first chance at a mega payday (one he's been working for his entire life and, in recent years, against considerable odds), he is just now entering his prime, and he just won a Lombardi. This will have absolutely no bearing on Flacco's deal.
#9
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:18 PM
100% agreed......Joe just came out his rookie contract and Brady just came out of his fatty contract so there is a big difference........Tom Brady has already gotten paid, has endorsements out of his backside, and is at the tail end of his career where his only desire is to bring another Lombardi to New England. This is Joe's first chance at a mega payday (one he's been working for his entire life and, in recent years, against considerable odds), he is just now entering his prime, and he just won a Lombardi. This will have absolutely no bearing on Flacco's deal.
#10
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:22 PM
....Tom Brady has already gotten paid, has endorsements out of his backside, and is at the tail end of his career where his only desire is to bring another Lombardi to New England. This is Joe's first chance at a mega payday (one he's been working for his entire life and, in recent years, against considerable odds), he is just now entering his prime, and he just won a Lombardi. This will have absolutely no bearing on Flacco's deal.
I agree with most of your points, but I think it will have some impact. Tom Brady is arguably the best QB in the league and he is Joe's biggest competition in the AFC. He is taking less to help his team win. I think Joe is a very reasonable guy who sees the big picture. The Ravens want him to be a Raven for life and he wants to be here too. Joe just lost a little bit of leverage.
Reloaded

#11
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:23 PM

"Bring it. They want physical. They want to run against us. You know we'll be there."
#12
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:33 PM
Also, how many times can Joe Flacco outplay him until we can acknowledge, that he doesn't have the AFC in a choke hold the way he used to?
#13
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:38 PM
The Patriots just extended Tom Brady for 3 more years at an astronomically low 27M.
It puts the Pats in great cap position through 2017.
http://sportsillustr...riots-contract/
Hopefully, this helps the Ravens a bit in their negotiations with Joe. If Tom can take considerably less than market value, maybe Joe does too.
I don't think this does anything at all to Joes contract. Tom is on the back end of his career, not 27 coming off a Super Bowl. People forget that Brady only won his SB's when the Pasties had a good defense. Toms best football is far behind him IMO.
Tom Brady wouldn't have taken this deal 10 years ago, after a Super Bowl.... Joe isn't going to either.. Two totally different worlds at this point in their respective careers.
Edited by H8R, 25 February 2013 - 05:40 PM.
#14
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:40 PM
I agree with most of your points, but I think it will have some impact. Tom Brady is arguably the best QB in the league and he is Joe's biggest competition in the AFC. He is taking less to help his team win. I think Joe is a very reasonable guy who sees the big picture. The Ravens want him to be a Raven for life and he wants to be here too. Joe just lost a little bit of leverage.
I see what you mean but I think you're overrating how much Joe or his agent care about what Tom Brady is doing. Joe already has a Lombardi (so it's not like he's chasing the dragon) and Tom didn't take less money to help his team when he was in the same position as Joe. If anything, Flacco is comparing himself to Brady when he got his second contract, not today's Brady. Back then, Brady cashed in (which is a major reason why their defense/WRs are so awful) and it's hard to think Flacco won't do the same. If anything, the fact that the Patriots are going to get better because Brady has extended is going give Joe more leverage because we need him to carry us that much more.
Also, Brady is making silly amounts of money in endorsements and is married to one of the preeminent super models of our generation... Joe does have the same level of supplemental income to justify giving the Ravens a break.
Edited by beasy2487, 25 February 2013 - 05:42 PM.
#15
Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:40 PM
Losers always say "Next time's gonna be different!". That's right, next time you're gonna lose again.
#16
Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:12 PM
I see what you mean but I think you're overrating how much Joe or his agent care about what Tom Brady is doing. Joe already has a Lombardi (so it's not like he's chasing the dragon) and Tom didn't take less money to help his team when he was in the same position as Joe. If anything, Flacco is comparing himself to Brady when he got his second contract, not today's Brady. Back then, Brady cashed in (which is a major reason why their defense/WRs are so awful) and it's hard to think Flacco won't do the same. If anything, the fact that the Patriots are going to get better because Brady has extended is going give Joe more leverage because we need him to carry us that much more.
Also, Brady is making silly amounts of money in endorsements and is married to one of the preeminent super models of our generation... Joe does have the same level of supplemental income to justify giving the Ravens a break.
Outside sources of income don't matter when it comes to negotiating a contract. Whether Joe makes 18M a year or 20M a year it's not like he is going to be in a different situation financially. I think more pressure probably comes from his agent and the Player's Union than anything else to take the most money he can possibly get.
I cant see how Joe car argue...Tom is taking less money, so give me more because you will need me that much more. That is fool's logic. Joe knows just like everyone else how much the cap is going to be an annual problem moving forward for the Ravens and the more he gets paid, the less there is to pay other players.
I'm perfectly fine with paying Joe 20M a year, but I also think there is a little bit of give and take that needs to go into the negotiation. Maybe you offer him 20M a year but only if he signs for 7 or 8 years. Or maybe you give him 20M that is reached based on "likely to reach incentives", but the minimum is closer to 18M per year.
Reloaded

#17
Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:26 PM
#18
Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:36 PM
#19
Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:36 PM
I see what you mean but I think you're overrating how much Joe or his agent care about what Tom Brady is doing. Joe already has a Lombardi (so it's not like he's chasing the dragon) and Tom didn't take less money to help his team when he was in the same position as Joe. If anything, Flacco is comparing himself to Brady when he got his second contract, not today's Brady. Back then, Brady cashed in (which is a major reason why their defense/WRs are so awful) and it's hard to think Flacco won't do the same. If anything, the fact that the Patriots are going to get better because Brady has extended is going give Joe more leverage because we need him to carry us that much more.
Also, Brady is making silly amounts of money in endorsements and is married to one of the preeminent super models of our generation... Joe does have the same level of supplemental income to justify giving the Ravens a break.
Brady took a home town discount in 2005 also, not as big but signifigant none the less.
Some players around the league would laugh at Brady for not making a big stink that he's nowhere near the highest-paid quarterback in football. He's due to make a salary of $5.5 million in 2005, with a salary-cap number of $8.37 million. I asked him last week about his seeming reticence to tub-thump, even though no other marquee player has what he has right now -- three Super Bowl rings by age 27. "To be the highest-paid, or anything like that, is not going to make me feel any better," he said. "That's not what makes me happy. In this game, the more one player gets, the more he takes away from what others can get. Is it going to make me feel any better to make an extra million, which, after you take everything [taxes and other deductions] away, is about $500,000? That million might be more important to the team.''
#20
Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:37 PM
We now have one ring for each middle finger
May shame rain down upon you from the heavens for the dastardly deed that hast been done!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















