Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

JO_75

2013 BR.com Mock Draft: Restricted Free Agency

211 posts in this topic

[quote name='Sizzlebshu' timestamp='1361410326' post='1363559']
I believe so.
[/quote]

If that is the case, what was the last bid for Shields that was not a bid by Oakland?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='JO_75' timestamp='1361410546' post='1363561']
If that is the case, what was the last bid for Shields that was not a bid by Oakland?
[/quote]
Miami, who also does not have a 2nd round pick IIRC.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='JO_75' timestamp='1361410546' post='1363561']


If that is the case, what was the last bid for Shields that was not a bid by Oakland?
[/quote]

Dolphins I think but they traded a 2nd but I'm not sure if it was theirs or the Colts.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='GrimCoconut' timestamp='1361410616' post='1363564']
Miami, who also does not have a 2nd round pick IIRC.
[/quote]
This may not matter so long as their second rounder is 11th or better.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='gabefergy' timestamp='1361410687' post='1363567']
I guess that means Shield will remain in GB.
[/quote]
Guess so.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know. I think it should've been ironed out in the beginning anyway. Now the Oakland owner (Alexir) might be upset because he didn't get Shields when he thought he would. Granted, he doesn't have his original 2nd round pick but still, I think we should put it up to a vote or something. I don't think it's fair to Alexir. Also, maybe Indianstick wants the 2nd round pick.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='GrimCoconut' timestamp='1361410893' post='1363570']
I don't know. I think it should've been ironed out in the beginning anyway. Now the Oakland owner (Alexir) might be upset because he didn't get Shields when he thought he would. Granted, he doesn't have his original 2nd round pick but still, I think we should put it up to a vote or something. I don't think it's fair to Alexir. Also, maybe Indianstick wants the 2nd round pick.
[/quote]
No. This really shouldn't be put to a vote. If they still want the pick, then a trade can occur. Ditto for you Gabe if you want Shields desperately.

Alexir technically didn't get screwed because he had no shot at him to begin with.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Sizzlebshu' timestamp='1361410973' post='1363571']
No. This really shouldn't be put to a vote. If they still want the pick, then a trade can occur. Ditto for you Gabe if you want Shields desperately.

Alexir technically didn't get screwed because he had no shot at him to begin with.
[/quote]

Alexir has the higher pick so he should get the priority. I would trade my 2nd for Shields (it would be at 2 stars right) if it came to it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Sizzlebshu' timestamp='1361410973' post='1363571']
No. This really shouldn't be put to a vote. If they still want the pick, then a trade can occur. Ditto for you Gabe if you want Shields desperately.

Alexir technically didn't get screwed because he had no shot at him to begin with.
[/quote]
All I'm saying is outside of what Arnie said in the beginning, nothing was really given to explain restricted free agency. I think there's part blame on Alexir for not understanding he no longer had his original pick when Arnie posted it in this very thread (I believe). I think we could have done a better job with explaining conditions, such as "if you have two 2nd round picks, then..." or "if you do not have your original 2nd round pick, then...". But to go and just not have anything in the rules about this...well, it doesn't make sense. It makes even less sense when people have traded all around as much as we have.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='gabefergy' timestamp='1361411116' post='1363575']
Alexir has the higher pick so he should get the priority. I would trade my 2nd for Shields (it would be at 2 stars right) if it came to it.
[/quote]
Its still a trade situation. Meaning that at this point discretion falls to the GB owner. If you wanted to offer a 2nd and 4th to overbid Alexir you could. Im just saying thats how this should be played out.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Sizzlebshu' timestamp='1361411221' post='1363578']
Its still a trade situation. Meaning that at this point discretion falls to the GB owner. If you wanted to offer a 2nd and 4th to overbid Alexir you could. Im just saying thats how this should be played out.
[/quote]

I think that's fair, but I would still let Indianstick and Alexir work it out first because technically he did win the bid.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='GrimCoconut' timestamp='1361411205' post='1363577']
All I'm saying is outside of what Arnie said in the beginning, nothing was really given to explain restricted free agency. I think there's part blame on Alexir for not understanding he no longer had his original pick when Arnie posted it in this very thread (I believe). I think we could have done a better job with explaining conditions, such as "if you have two 2nd round picks, then..." or "if you do not have your original 2nd round pick, then...". But to go and just not have anything in the rules about this...well, it doesn't make sense. It makes even less sense when people have traded all around as much as we have.
[/quote]
Im just saying theres no reason to change it now when a trade makes it easily fixable. It will be accounted for next time, but no one really got screwed and if both parties still would like this to happen it can be adjusted for with a trade.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Sizzlebshu' timestamp='1361411353' post='1363582']
Im just saying theres no reason to change it now when a trade makes it easily fixable. It will be accounted for next time, but no one really got screwed and if both parties still would like this to happen it can be adjusted for with a trade.
[/quote]
Agreed. It should be fixed for next time. I just think it could have been avoided entirely. I think Alexir's at fault for not reading Arnie's post about the matter.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Sizzlebshu' timestamp='1361411353' post='1363582']
Im just saying theres no reason to change it now when a trade makes it easily fixable. It will be accounted for next time, but no one really got screwed and if both parties still would like this to happen it can be adjusted for with a trade.
[/quote]
[quote name='GrimCoconut' timestamp='1361411563' post='1363588']
Agreed. It should be fixed for next time. I just think it could have been avoided entirely. I think Alexir's at fault for not reading Arnie's post about the matter.
[/quote]

agree with both of you guys. It could of been avoided and next time should be clarified better. I will entertain trades for shields but he is probably GB's best corner and I like him a lot and think he is a bargain for 2 stars. I was devastated when i saw the bid was 8 stars because that would be a hard decision for me to make to match it but then I was pumped when i realized oakland would have a top 5 pick in the second round, but then I realized they didn't have their pick so I was kind of happy cause I would rather not give up shields.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='indianstick' timestamp='1361411824' post='1363593']
agree with both of you guys. It could of been avoided and next time should be clarified better. I will entertain trades for shields but he is probably GB's best corner and I like him a lot and think he is a bargain for 2 stars. I was devastated when i saw the bid was 8 stars because that would be a hard decision for me to make to match it but then I was pumped when i realized oakland would have a top 5 pick in the second round, but then I realized they didn't have their pick so I was kind of happy cause I would rather not give up shields.
[/quote]
Yeah, I personally wouldn't trade him for even a 1st round pick unless it was top-10 and you could get Millner. He's a great player and his price is dirt cheap. That's why I was saying it's a big deal and when Sizzle mentioned a trade it didn't matter because really I know I wouldn't trade a 2 S CB with that much talent.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='indianstick' timestamp='1361411824' post='1363593']
agree with both of you guys. It could of been avoided and next time should be clarified better. I will entertain trades for shields but he is probably GB's best corner and I like him a lot and think he is a bargain for 2 stars. I was devastated when i saw the bid was 8 stars because that would be a hard decision for me to make to match it but then I was pumped when i realized oakland would have a top 5 pick in the second round, but then I realized they didn't have their pick so I was kind of happy cause I would rather not give up shields.
[/quote]

Sounds like quite the wave of emotions.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='GrimCoconut' timestamp='1361411964' post='1363597']
Yeah, I personally wouldn't trade him for even a 1st round pick unless it was top-10 and you could get Millner. He's a great player and his price is dirt cheap. That's why I was saying it's a big deal and when Sizzle mentioned a trade it didn't matter because really I know I wouldn't trade a 2 S CB with that much talent.
[/quote]

Yeah i mean its not really a big deal
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='gabefergy' timestamp='1361411992' post='1363598']
Sounds like quite the wave of emotions.
[/quote]
Not sure why, but this made me laugh out loud.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='JO_75' timestamp='1361408450' post='1363518']
Fine by me, now I have one less need in Free Agency with a talented proven player and not wasting it on someone hoping he pans out.
[/quote]

lol EDS has started a total of 9 games, i wouldn't necessary call him a talented proven player, and he's certainly not worth the 33rd. Center would of still been a need for me if no one bid on him.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='gabefergy' timestamp='1361411992' post='1363598']
Sounds like quite the wave of emotions.
[/quote]

[quote name='GrimCoconut' timestamp='1361412376' post='1363604']
Not sure why, but this made me laugh out loud.
[/quote]

lol i def hyped that up
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I fear this free agency is going to go nuts.

Sam Shields for 8 Stars and a 2nd rounder.

Man, talk about overpaying.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Corvus Amplus' timestamp='1361416113' post='1363652']
I fear this free agency is going to go nuts.

Sam Shields for 8 Stars and a 2nd rounder.

Man, talk about overpaying.
[/quote]

Well it didnt actually happen, but is that really overpaying? He is one of the best young CBs in the league.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='GrimCoconut' timestamp='1361408277' post='1363510']

It was Arnie. I remember because I quoted his post, lol.

Perhaps we should vote on it? I don't know if it's ever happened IRL. I've also never seen an official rule on it anywhere,
[/quote]
If it happens in real life the team just gives up their second in next years draft
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wait, wasn't the bid 8 stars because Arnie was competitng with someone else for Shields? So shouldn't the bid revert back to the last bid made by whoever was competing with Arnie for him and that would become the new official bid to match?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='gabefergy' timestamp='1361416216' post='1363653']
Well it didnt actually happen, but is that really overpaying? He is one of the best young CBs in the league.
[/quote]
Yes it really is overpaying
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='JO_75' timestamp='1361420030' post='1363681']
Wait, wasn't the bid 8 stars because Arnie was competitng with someone else for Shields? So shouldn't the bid revert back to the last bid made by whoever was competing with Arnie for him and that would become the new official bid to match?
[/quote]
You mean Alexir? Arnie never bid on Shields. Gabe bid on Shields too I think but the same rule applies.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='GrimCoconut' timestamp='1361420500' post='1363686']
You mean Alexir? Arnie never bid on Shields. Gabe bid on Shields too I think but the same rule applies.
[/quote]

so the verdict is shields stays on GB unless I decide to move him?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='gabefergy' timestamp='1361416216' post='1363653']
Well it didnt actually happen, but is that really overpaying? He is one of the best young CBs in the league.
[/quote]

He is very talented but it's tough to say whether he is worth 8M (and a second round pick). That would mean he is a #1 corner and shut down #1 receivers, he def has the potential to but don't know if he's quite there yet.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Never saw anything saying it had to be my orignal 2nd around pick but that I had to have a 2nd round pick.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.