Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mt. Crushmore

2013 Forum Draft: Discussion

9,717 posts in this topic

Any concensus on a day and time?  Should we start sign ups now, give a 24 hour sign up period, do the random number generator, make picks by Monday at 7?

 

If everyone's fine with the idea of utilizing a version of the UDFA format, the I can't disagree with any of this. I'd say the sign-ups should happen today at 7 PM, tomorrow at the latest. My only concerns are, who would use the random number generator, and have we come to a consensus regarding the costs?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could do the random number generator if they end up costing something.  I have no cap left so I wouldn't be participating. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could do the random number generator if they end up costing something.  I have no cap left so I wouldn't be participating. 

 

Thank you for offering. We still have to figure that part out. I'd say that we should have a vote, but I'm not sure if that would take up too much time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe just cast your vote as you dign up for free, .25 or .5 as you sign up majority rules.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe just cast your vote as you dign up for free, .25 or .5 as you sign up majority rules.

 

That's a very good idea. This would kill two birds with one stone. .25 is an interesting one. I was also thinking of adding the first one free and the rest being .5 Stars.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume we can sign up and cut players right before we pick if we have no cap, correct?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume we can sign up and cut players right before we pick if we have no cap, correct?

 

I don't see why not. I believe that you have the green light.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Personally, I say make the free agents free. Here's my thought process on it: everyone had had an opportunity to bid on these guys. People passed. A lot of teams bid with the idea of using all their cap. Furthermore, if we cut these players nobody can bid on them anyway. They're essentially out of jobs. In the real NFL you can sign guys at any time.

I just feel like it's unnecessary now to charge a cap hit on these guys. You can implement many methods to prevent abuse. My greatest concern is someone having the opportunity to select back to back bids. That's why I am against a true free for all.

Whatever the time limit it should be short. This doesn't need to take long or require heavy thought.

We can add the 90 player limit to balance it a bit. Or We could reduce that limit. Just an idea.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I made my stance on FA very clear. Just in case I haven't, I'll summarize simply: 

 

1. These free agents should be that--free.

2. We operate off of the rule of 51. Under that rule, NFL teams abuse it all the time to fill up their rosters to have camp competitions. That's what this is.

3. These players would either be cut after training camp, or would be retained on the team & others cut in favor of these veterans.

4. Everyone had a shot at these players at least once in most cases. 

5. We must prevent any one member from being able to initially make consecutive bids/signings within a short duration, as that would be grossly unfair. 

6. I don't mind a roster cap, where we must operate under a certain amount of players, thereby limiting the amount of FA we sign. Also, if draft picks are cut or UDFAs are cut, those players should be eligible to enter the pool after a 24hour period. 

7. I don't know how we can do it, but I feel we should mix up the order. It's about time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Start Friday

 

Teams can bid on remaining players if they want.

 

The rest go on a sign-up list.

 

And we continue to pick until people are satisfied with their 90 player limit.

 

I personally care less how many players you want to hoard.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I made my stance on FA very clear. Just in case I haven't, I'll summarize simply:

1. These free agents should be that--free.
2. We operate off of the rule of 51. Under that rule, NFL teams abuse it all the time to fill up their rosters to have camp competitions. That's what this is.
3. These players would either be cut after training camp, or would be retained on the team & others cut in favor of these veterans.
4. Everyone had a shot at these players at least once in most cases.
5. We must prevent any one member from being able to initially make consecutive bids/signings within a short duration, as that would be grossly unfair.
6. I don't mind a roster cap, where we must operate under a certain amount of players, thereby limiting the amount of FA we sign. Also, if draft picks are cut or UDFAs are cut, those players should be eligible to enter the pool after a 24hour period.
7. I don't know how we can do it, but I feel we should mix up the order. It's about time.


So should we start sign ups at least tonight? I think everyone is pretty much ready to cloase out this process.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So should we start sign ups at least tonight? I think everyone is pretty much ready to cloase out this process.

 

Definitely. I'd say at 7 PM, if that works for everybody.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Top 4 teams in my power rankings are posted, standings and playoff seedings to come soon

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think we are starting sign ups now. I will get the ball rolling. I am in and vote for them to cost .25 stars a very minimal contract. Essentially you can get 2 for one.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are starting sign ups now. I will get the ball rolling. I am in and vote for them to cost .25 stars a very minimal contract. Essentially you can get 2 for one.

Is there a separate thread or are we posting in this one?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are starting sign ups now. I will get the ball rolling. I am in and vote for them to cost .25 stars a very minimal contract. Essentially you can get 2 for one.

We have never had any player cost .25 stars. It's either free or .50 stars. I don't see any other way working.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm what happened to signing up today at 7?

 

Were we opening a new thread or were we going to post here?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Someonecshould make an executive decision as to where to sign up and vote for what cost you want. If the cost is too much pervthevvote you can just drop out then.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites