The fair catch hit on Reed and the Mayo hit on Pitta
#1
Posted 25 January 2013 - 11:52 PM
#2
Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:02 AM

If tomorrow wasn't promised, what would you give for today? - Ray Lewis
There is nothin' in the world...there's no place on this earth that's better than Baltimore. We believe in each other from day one. 1996 to now. I love you forever, and ever, and ever, and ever, and ever.- Ray Lewis
#3
Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:23 AM
#4
Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:25 AM
she wasn't amused.

#5
Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:42 AM
I'm surprised they just let the hit on Reed go. They're normally stingy about that stuff. But again, I won't complain. It's something Harbaugh would send to the league office for clarification. Used to hear about him doing that a lot. Of course those were in games we lost at the expense of poor officiating.
Losers always say "Next time's gonna be different!". That's right, next time you're gonna lose again.
#6
Posted 26 January 2013 - 01:01 AM
#7
Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:28 AM
The fear that Pollard causes after blasting someone over the middle is worth a 15 yard penalty. The receivers we face seem to have weak psyches and get scared, and I'm expecting no less from Crabtree and Moss.
To be fair, if I'd just been hit by Pollard I'd be thinking twice about going up for catches with him nearby. The new rules kind of encourage receivers to be softer than they were. They don't expect big hits any more and seem to be like deer in the headlights for the rest of the game after a big Pollard hit.
Edited by Clutch Ravens, 26 January 2013 - 08:28 AM.
#7 Overall - Dion Jordan, OLB, Oregon
#38 Overall - Johnthan Banks, CB, Mississippi State
#94 Overall - Corey Lemonier, OLB, Auburn
#113 Overall - E.J. Manuel, QB, FSU
#144 Overall - Joseph Randle, RB, OSU
#178 Overall - Jordan Mills, OT/G, Louisiana Tech
#218 Overall - Greg Reid, CB, FSU
#224 Overall - Knile Davis, RB, Arkansas
#8
Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:43 AM
I was watching the game on my DVR the other night again and I gave these 2 plays a few extra looks in slow mo.. Don't get me wrong the mayo hit was awesome how football should be but if you're going to call it on us his helmet did make contact with pittas facemask/helmet and he was defenseless and the ed reed fair catch hit on his punt return the NE guy actually was pushed into reed but his own teammate not blocked by a raven and it looked like he may of made helmet to helmet contact.. Has anyone heard about these plays, fines or anything?
I'm assuming the league isn't doing anything about these hits, since they've already passed out fines to other players in this game.
That hit on Reed is just digusting and I can't even comprehend how it wasn't FLAGGED or FINED. I mean, it's a FAIR CATCH. The officials might have multiple things to watch, but they sure as hell should be watching the person catching the ball to see where he caught it, and if he caught it or was interfered with. How a clear helmet-to-helmet hit on a fair catch is not called... just makes absolutely no sense. And I really wish more people were making a big deal out of this call than the Brady call.
As for the Mayo hit... the initial contact wasn't with the helmets. It was secondary contact. NOW, by the "letter of the law/rule" this should be fined and flagged because there was contact of helmets. But, just like Pollard's hit... I don't believe it is a bad hit and shouldn't be flagged or fined. Flacco pretty much set Pitta up to get rocked, it happens when defense is covering everyone well. For the record, I don't believe either Pollard or Ray Lewis's hit should be against the rules either. Ray Lewis's shoulder is what hit first, and Pollard only made secondary contact to the helmet.
What really digusts me is fans around the country are actully starting the believe that the Ravens are FAVORED by the officials. I mean... I never thought I'd live to see the day anyone actually said that.
#9
Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:57 AM
#10
Posted 26 January 2013 - 09:54 AM
Pollard makes a proper football move and gets a 15k fine, Brady uses his leg to impale Reed on his cleats (not a football move) like a coward and gets hit with 10k fine.....Vernon Davis had to pay more regarding his damn socks. Roger Goodell is the worst commissioner we have ever had.
Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose.
Rings don't lie.
PSN Alexir23
#11
Posted 26 January 2013 - 09:13 PM
#12
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:54 PM
Plays like C.Brown hit where u can see the WR lower their head to brace for the hit means that they are defending themselves and thus aren't defenseless. It's ridiculous how defense players make a regular tackle offensive players ducking their heads and then get the catch and an extra 15 yards tacked on.
#13
Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:32 PM
I'm not saying it's right, but according to the new rules it should have been a penalty.
#14
Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:38 PM
Godell gets money from Kraft.....The Mayo hit was NOT clean. He led with the shoulder and hit Pitta in the chest, but the crown of his helmet definitely caught Pitta in the chin area of the face mask. This is a flag. We got a penalty for something almost exactly like this against the Broncos.
I'm not saying it's right, but according to the new rules it should have been a penalty.
Always has been this way
Do ya Feel Lucky Punk?
~SAM
#15
Posted 27 January 2013 - 01:08 AM
The Mayo hit was NOT clean. He led with the shoulder and hit Pitta in the chest, but the crown of his helmet definitely caught Pitta in the chin area of the face mask. This is a flag. We got a penalty for something almost exactly like this against the Broncos.
I'm not saying it's right, but according to the new rules it should have been a penalty.
This is dead on. The crown of his helmet clearly goes right into Pitta's facemask, and that's a call I've seen made against us it seems like every week. A lot of the time I see that called against us after a receiver lowers himself into the plane of the tackler's helmet. Pitta didn't have time to even do that, which is the very definition of a defenseless receiver taking helmet to helmet contact. He made the TD on the next play, but before that the unfairness of the hit not getting called had me yelling at my TV.
#16
Posted 27 January 2013 - 01:25 AM
You are correct that it was a clean hit if they call it that way every time but they do not. The league has been calling these hits as defenseless when a player is not given a step after the catch. It is very rare in today's rules that when someone takes a shot like that they do not call a penalty. It should have been called.Mayo's hit on Pitta was clean. That said, I just can't imagine Reed or Pollard doing the same thing without getting flagged. It seems impossible nowadays.
#17
Posted 27 January 2013 - 01:31 AM
This is football, not teacups with the Queen.
#18
Posted 27 January 2013 - 08:00 AM
I didn't see it too well when it happened but can't understand why the Pats weren't flagged for the contact on Reed after the fair catch. I've never witnessed that not called unless the defender was blocked into the man by the opposing team, which we know didn't happen.
Ray got flagged for the hit on Hernandez but count the steps , all three of them. He was not a defenseless reciever and Ray was aiming for the body but Hernandez lowered his head into the striking zone.
On the other hand look at both the time elapsed and the viciousness of the Pitta hit. Pitta barely got both feet down and unlike Hernandez had no time at all to make a defensive move to protect himself from the Mayo impact. It was the epitome of a defenseless reciever, yet nothing from the officials.
We've seen in weeks past the Ravens get flagged for less in fact we've seen it numerous times in this game.
#19
Posted 27 January 2013 - 08:06 AM
I rewatched the game complete with many rewinds-
I didn't see it too well when it happened but can't understand why the Pats weren't flagged for the contact on Reed after the fair catch. I've never witnessed that not called unless the defender was blocked into the man by the opposing team, which we know didn't happen.
Ray got flagged for the hit on Hernandez but count the steps , all three of them. He was not a defenseless reciever and Ray was aiming for the body but Hernandez lowered his head into the striking zone.
On the other hand look at both the time elapsed and the viciousness of the Pitta hit. Pitta barely got both feet down and unlike Hernandez had no time at all to make a defensive move to protect himself from the Mayo impact. It was the epitome of a defenseless reciever, yet nothing from the officials.
We've seen in weeks past the Ravens get flagged for less in fact we've seen it numerous times in this game.
I have a feeling we will see a lot of these types of hits next Sunday. We can only hope the calls are fair and equitable.
#20
Posted 27 January 2013 - 09:54 AM
Edited by Corvus, 27 January 2013 - 09:56 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















