Week 17, Bengals, Playoff implications
#1
Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:19 PM
Assuming(hoping migh be the better words choice) the Ravens can win one of the next 2 games... which would guarantee a Playoff spot, would you be okay with "throwing" or playing reserves in Week 17?
Not only does it give the starters a chance to rest since they won't have the luxury of a BYE week... but it might end up giving the Bengals a win and eliminating the Steelers from playoff contention.
And of course, since reserves likely won't be playing in the playoffs, it gives the team another chance in regular season action to see what they have talent-wise.
#2
Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:22 PM
So that Week 17 game might end up being the deciding factor as to whether Cincinnati or Pittsburgh makes the playoffs.
Assuming(hoping migh be the better words choice) the Ravens can win one of the next 2 games... which would guarantee a Playoff spot, would you be okay with "throwing" or playing reserves in Week 17?
Not only does it give the starters a chance to rest since they won't have the luxury of a BYE week... but it might end up giving the Bengals a win and eliminating the Steelers from playoff contention.
And of course, since reserves likely won't be playing in the playoffs, it gives the team another chance in regular season action to see what they have talent-wise.
Like its been said. We don't even have to win one more game as long as the Pittsburgh-Cincinnati game doesn't end in a tie.
With a new OC. I think we need all the additional practice (gametime) we can get. Let's go into the playoffs winning against a divisional foe. Plus the Bengals aren't anything less to fear than the Steelers.
Really the Pittsburgh-Cincy game matters more than this game. The winner goes, loser doesn't. This game might not even matter either way.
Edited by PuRock, 10 December 2012 - 01:25 PM.
#3
Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:24 PM
Like its been said. We don't even have to win one more game as long as the Pittsburgh-Cincinnati game doesn't even end in a tie.
With a new OC. I think we need all the additional practice (gametime) we can get. Let's go into the playoffs winning against a divisional foe. Plus the Bengals aren't anything less to fear than the Steelers.
Really the Pittsburgh-CINCY game matters more than this game. The winner goes, loser doesn't. This game might not even matter either way.
Think this is what you meant.
#4
Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:25 PM
Think this is what you meant.
Have a habit of doing that lately.
#5
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:17 AM
Like its been said. We don't even have to win one more game as long as the Pittsburgh-Cincinnati game doesn't end in a tie.
With a new OC. I think we need all the additional practice (gametime) we can get. Let's go into the playoffs winning against a divisional foe. Plus the Bengals aren't anything less to fear than the Steelers.
Really the Pittsburgh-Cincy game matters more than this game. The winner goes, loser doesn't. This game might not even matter either way.
Assuming the game doesn't matter from the standpoint that it doesn't eliminate Pittsburgh...
Would you rather "go out on a win against a division opponent" playing starters?
Or would you rather give the starters as much rest as possible?
If that game ends up meaning the division or wildcard.... is home field more important than basically a bye week for the starters?
#6
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:26 AM
#7
Posted 11 December 2012 - 12:24 PM
If the Ravens can't gain position, then i think the offense plays the entire game, but the defensive starts don't. As someone said, the Bengals Steelers game will be huge because, winner puts themself in a great position to make the playoffs. However based on what the Colts do, you might have a situation where you are playing the Bengals in back to back weeks. If those guys are fighting for their season, you don't want your players going half speed against a team going 110%.
I think if the Ravens can bounce back and defeat the Broncos and NYG, I think you'll see week 17 used as a bye week of sorts for the injuries and older guys.
#8
Posted 11 December 2012 - 12:28 PM
#9
Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:14 PM
Now you can say on here what you want about their being no difference between playing the Steelers and the Bengals in the playoffs and that is a load of crap in my opinion. The Steelers have a ton of players with not only a ton of playoff experience but Super Bowl experience and Super Bowl winning experience and they have players that know how to win and know what the playoffs are all about. They also have Ben Roethlisberger back who when and if he is on is one of the most dangerous QB's you dont want to face in the playoffs. Now you look at the Steelers and then you compare that to facing the a team like the Bengals. What have the Bengals done the last 4-5 years that would make you fear them more then a team with a ton of playoff experience like the Steelers?? What have they proven?? Sure they made the playoffs last year but the bottom line is they dont win playoff games, when they do get to the playoffs they dont win, The jury is still out on a guy like Andy Dalton who has had some success but has yet to prove he is a big time QB and can beat teams like the Ravens or the Steelers when it matters. So while I am a Steelers fan no doubt and I am not just saying this because I am but anybody who is going to come on here and say that there is more reason to be just as scared if not more scared to play a team like the Bengals over the Steelers is a bit delusional in my opinion...
#10
Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:03 PM
Losers always say "Next time's gonna be different!". That's right, next time you're gonna lose again.
#11
Posted 15 December 2012 - 12:28 AM
Do ya Feel Lucky Punk?
~SAM
#12
Posted 15 December 2012 - 12:44 AM
#13
Posted 15 December 2012 - 02:45 PM
#14
Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:19 PM
#15
Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:38 PM
#16
Posted 15 December 2012 - 08:15 PM
So while it's a tough schedule, I think the Ravens can find a way to win a game or two. If we can win a game or two our chances of getting a homefield play-off game or advantage goes up tremendously especially if we beat the Broncos/Bengals or both. If you look at the last two super bowl winners they didn't rank high in the power rankings or even look like a lock to get to the play-offs. But what those teams did was start to play their best football in December.
If we can do that, AND get a little healthier then I think we can shock the world in February.
#17
Posted 15 December 2012 - 08:23 PM
Whew this is a bit of early speculation here, but as fans we have the luxury of taking a peek at the remaining schedule.
So while it's a tough schedule, I think the Ravens can find a way to win a game or two. If we can win a game or two our chances of getting a homefield play-off game or advantage goes up tremendously especially if we beat the Broncos/Bengals or both. If you look at the last two super bowl winners they didn't rank high in the power rankings or even look like a lock to get to the play-offs. But what those teams did was start to play their best football in December.
If we can do that, AND get a little healthier then I think we can shock the world in February.
Out of the three which 2 do we beat in your opinion friend. My choices would be Giants and Bengals.
#18
Posted 15 December 2012 - 08:38 PM
Nope. I believe we're in even if we lose the rest of our games. THe only way we can be knocked out is if we lose out and the Steelers and Bengals tie. It's very doubtful that will happen. We just need one win in the next three games to clinch the division, but I really don't want the team backing into the playoffs.By no means are we out of the play off picture if we lose out. Some very strange things need to happen to eliminate us but we need to be on track with either the offense or defense along with our steady special teams play. In any case though how far do you think we really go in the play offs. one and done, 2 and out at best right.
#19
Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:50 PM
#20
Posted 15 December 2012 - 10:03 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















