I was just looking ahead at their remaining games, and besides us, Denver has a cakewalk. I feel our remaining games are much tougher. I see them at 12-4, unless we hiccup. This does put some pressure on us to continue to get better, and figure out what exactly we want to do on offense. Looking forward to this game, seeing if our D can hang with Peyton.
Denver Broncos
Started by
Gashman
, Nov 28 2012 11:36 PM
12 replies to this topic
#2
BMORElegacy
-
- Members
-
- 3,652 posts
MVP
- Gender:Male
- Location:Philly, PA
Posted 29 November 2012 - 06:18 PM
It'll be a test with Peyton finding his stride in the new system. They look good and looking ahead I see them and Eli's Giants as our biggest two remaining games.
It has the potential of being a very tough game.
It has the potential of being a very tough game.
"No weapon forged against us shall prosper. And every tongue which rises against us in judgment, we shall condemn."
#3
Bltravens
-
- Members
-
- 7,976 posts
Livin In An Igloo
- Gender:Male
- Location:Great White North
Posted 29 November 2012 - 06:24 PM
Thankfully this one is at home but we're going to have serious issues with Dumerville and Von Miller on the edges. Peyton always shreds us and now he has a better blocking line than he did in Indy. His WRs aren't as good however. I'll be disappointed if we get torched by a WR like Decker or Stockley's 39 year old self. Webb would have been ideal for this game to cut off Stockley from the slot.
#4
AsianRice
-
- Members
-
- 3,204 posts
MVP
- Gender:Male
- Location:Frederick, MD
Posted 29 November 2012 - 06:42 PM
He is Manning's secret weapon; whenever something is not working right, Manning will call Stockley, and most of the time it's either result with first down or TD....that old man is crafty with very good route running......Thankfully this one is at home but we're going to have serious issues with Dumerville and Von Miller on the edges. Peyton always shreds us and now he has a better blocking line than he did in Indy. His WRs aren't as good however. I'll be disappointed if we get torched by a WR like Decker or Stockley's 39 year old self. Webb would have been ideal for this game to cut off Stockley from the slot.
2013 WORLD CHAMPION
#5
K-Dog
-
- Members
-
- 4,405 posts
MVP
- Gender:Male
- Location:Millersville Maryland
Posted 29 November 2012 - 08:44 PM
At the beginning of the season I wrote this one as a loss.
My opinion has not changed.
My opinion has not changed.
K-Dog
"Animals want to learn how to talk so they can hang out with me." Ray Lewis
"Animals want to learn how to talk so they can hang out with me." Ray Lewis
#6
flaccopoe
-
- Members
-
- 8,927 posts
Mintberry Crunch
- Gender:Male
- Location:Capital of the World!
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:05 AM
The Ravens have to face both of the Mannings at the end of the season... damn! The Steelers and Bengals have much easier schedules, though one of them will likely knock the other out in Week 16.
Kudos to Peyton and co. for clinching a playoff spot! Mr. Manning is truly a spectacular athlete!
Kudos to Peyton and co. for clinching a playoff spot! Mr. Manning is truly a spectacular athlete!
Jay Z will look at you like it's gravy
"The day we outlaw trouser ferrets is the day only outlaws will have trouser ferrets." Alex Palmer, cracked.comHey man, in his defense it's a serious issue. poe is a noble guardian looking out for us all.
#7
Ravens<3
-
- Members
-
- 10,892 posts
52 G.O.A.T.
- Gender:Male
- Location:In Your Mind
Posted 03 December 2012 - 12:06 PM
Thomas & Decker are pretty damn good. Peyton makes everyone 10x better.Thankfully this one is at home but we're going to have serious issues with Dumerville and Von Miller on the edges. Peyton always shreds us and now he has a better blocking line than he did in Indy. His WRs aren't as good however. I'll be disappointed if we get torched by a WR like Decker or Stockley's 39 year old self. Webb would have been ideal for this game to cut off Stockley from the slot.
If our D can't get pressure on him we wont stand a chance.
#8
bpytnjr58
-
- Members
-
- 2,173 posts
Pro Bowler
- Gender:Male
- Location:Indio,Ca/ by way of Glen Burnie,Md
Posted 03 December 2012 - 12:49 PM
If the Broncos can get a Bye and play at home i would not rule them out playing in the AFC Title game and winning it...Manning has hit his stride and the Ravens secondary are going to have their hands full on Dec 16th.
#9
arnie_uk
-
- Members
-
- 10,376 posts
Like a Boss!
- Gender:Male
Posted 03 December 2012 - 04:21 PM
They hit form, 8 in a row I think, maybe 7. Their lass rush is legit, it will cause problems for any team, then they have manning. Obviously I'd never concede a game before it starts, so I wOuld say they are my number two team to win the Super Bowl behind us
WELCOME TO SIZZLEVILLE
#10
PuRock
-
- Members
-
- 28,115 posts
Skull Grinder
- Gender:Male
- Location:Maryland
Posted 03 December 2012 - 05:25 PM
They hit form, 8 in a row I think, maybe 7. Their lass rush is legit, it will cause problems for any team, then they have manning. Obviously I'd never concede a game before it starts, so I wOuld say they are my number two team to win the Super Bowl behind us
Seven. And six of those seven are against sub-500 teams. Before that they lost to playoff contenders, Texans, Patriots and Falcons.
I'm not saying the Broncos aren't a strong team. But I do think they are a bit overrated especially with their recent string of wins against poor competition. They haven't been moving the ball at will like some propose. They were going against the 32nd pass defense yesterday who was also down their top DB.
Their pass-rush is great though. I'll cede that. Plus I want to see how Manning does during December in Denver.
#11
Ravens<3
-
- Members
-
- 10,892 posts
52 G.O.A.T.
- Gender:Male
- Location:In Your Mind
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:15 PM
Agree. Although I still think they're serious contenders.Seven. And six of those seven are against sub-500 teams. Before that they lost to playoff contenders, Texans, Patriots and Falcons.
I'm not saying the Broncos aren't a strong team. But I do think they are a bit overrated especially with their recent string of wins against poor competition. They haven't been moving the ball at will like some propose. They were going against the 32nd pass defense yesterday who was also down their top DB.
Their pass-rush is great though. I'll cede that. Plus I want to see how Manning does during December in Denver.
#12
Bltravens
-
- Members
-
- 7,976 posts
Livin In An Igloo
- Gender:Male
- Location:Great White North
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:28 PM
They're both legit NFL WRs with Thomas being a specimen who I think we will have serious issues with. But I don't think much of Decker against press coverage. He's a slower guy without much initial burst, a savvy route runner with great hands. Typically we do ok against those kinds of receivers because Pees isn't afraid to play press man on them.Thomas & Decker are pretty damn good. Peyton makes everyone 10x better.
If our D can't get pressure on him we wont stand a chance.
But obviously it boils down to pressure, Manning will throw you open if he has all day to throw.
#13
flaccopoe
-
- Members
-
- 8,927 posts
Mintberry Crunch
- Gender:Male
- Location:Capital of the World!
Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:33 AM
Thankfully this one is at home but we're going to have serious issues with Dumerville and Von Miller on the edges. Peyton always shreds us and now he has a better blocking line than he did in Indy. His WRs aren't as good however. I'll be disappointed if we get torched by a WR like Decker or Stockley's 39 year old self. Webb would have been ideal for this game to cut off Stockley from the slot.
Decker's a pretty damn good receiver! And you can't forget super-trooper Demaryius Thomas! He plays his heart out every game.
For clarification, it's spelled 'Stokley.'
Jay Z will look at you like it's gravy
"The day we outlaw trouser ferrets is the day only outlaws will have trouser ferrets." Alex Palmer, cracked.comHey man, in his defense it's a serious issue. poe is a noble guardian looking out for us all.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
