Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

BR News

[News] NFL Suspends Ed Reed For One Game

167 posts in this topic

Ed Reed has been suspended for repeated violations of player safety rules.

[url=http://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/article-1/NFL-Suspends-Ed-Reed-For-One-Game/47e8d22f-a64b-4447-a49a-0ce4708fa000]View the full article[/url]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh COME ON!!! Football is a rough game. There will be hard hits, there willbe injuries, that is the risk you take when you choose to enter the NFL. Roger Goodell and the NFL Front Office are [ruining] football, it's saddening.
14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think this is probably a knee-jerk reaction on the part of the NFL due to all the concussed QB's from last week's games.

Not fair to Ed on this one though, as it appeared to me that Sanders lowered his head to draw that penalty, imho.
14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They need to ammend the rule because it is impossible for a defender to adjust the height on their hit when they are already aiming low and the "defensless" reciever ducks his own head to brace for impact. The ducking of the head should count as a football move...
11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hits in 3 years??? We are going back three seasons to penalize players? come on now. Reed isn't even putting people out of the game, he get's hurt more than his opponent does. goodness gracious...
7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
someone please post the NFL idiot's email address if the player dips and you have initiated your hit there is nothing you can do to adjust.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i am not happy about this...I understand the flag..im over that..but a suspension??? If you really look at the hit it looked like reed was hitting with his arm but the player put his head down so it looked like a head-to-head but it wasn't reeds intention..ughhhh
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wouldn't the 2010 hit deal with the prior CBA? what would that have to do with the current CBA rules
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i am lost for words. actually the words i would like to use would get me into trouble.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 times in 3 years. Is this the rule?

It is about safety safety safety.
They are going to do anything and everything for it.
It is the game now, get use to it.
-5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have so much respect for ed reed but he is the worst tackler on the team. He lunges in with his shoulder every time and thats how he gets hurt. I feel better having James Ihedibo back there for San Diego. Ed Reed is without a doubt one of the best safties ever but he is just wearing himself down at this point.
-9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='eek' timestamp='1353362299' post='1226478']
wouldn't the 2010 hit deal with the prior CBA? what would that have to do with the current CBA rules
[/quote]thats what I'm thinking before the rule change-- and it was a hit on Brees in 2010. Ed Reed with his neck issues would be the last to lead with his head.
I thought the hit by Clark on Pitta was worse.
5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They really need to look at these head to head hits when the receivers lower there helmets into an oncoming tackler. Its been killing these calls for a while now.
17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the league wants to show the world they're making a point in stopping concussions by using Ed, who's a well known player... it's got nothing to do with the hits (last two of three were unintentional and third back when gran'ma was a little princess)... nfl just wants the show, arbitrary rules (as per all fines) abound
3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is absolutely the most BS call the NFL could have made.
These hits were all unintentional, it just comes with the game to have instances where you may not have the time necessary to lower your pad level. Looks more like the league trying to make an example of Reed. Just wow. At least it's only one game so he'll be able to play the Steelers in a couple weeks.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This clearly demonstrates what I have been saying about the NFL's personal attack on Baltimore sports teams that runs all the way back to the Ted Marchibroda era. They have held something for years. They never show the Ravens in any of their feature stories on the Nfl.com site, the officiating against us, and other negativity. I am not surprised by this BS. Somebody should have the courage to speak up about this. smh!
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hits in 3 years gets you a suspension these days!?!? The fact that a hit from 2010 helps get you suspended 3 years later is maddening! Sometimes I think this league has become a joke.
7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's clear that all sports are run by the Mafia...
Why is it so important announce if a player will be playing in a game or not?

Remember Allen Iverson?
Do you remember that corrupt Rep that they found out was fixing games, said on sixty minuts that they would pick on Iverson. Call fouls on him because they didn't like him.
You can find it on YouTube..

It's well known that Arnold Rothstein fixed the 1919 world series. Gangsters...
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To quote one of my favorite comments from the nfl.com article, "This just in... Ed Reed is a football player."
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This bs, the league is upset that we beat the sainted Steelers, so they want to try to make sure we lose next week by being even more shorthanded. I know the league wants to protect players but this is so stupid, they really need to review these hits, i mean sometimes they just can't stop,
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites