Deonte Thompson on Offense.
#1
Posted 02 November 2012 - 10:52 PM
#2
Posted 02 November 2012 - 10:59 PM
It's like the old football saying - the most popular guy for a struggling team is the backup QB...
#3
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:02 PM
#4
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:23 PM
#5
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:30 PM
#6
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:35 PM

#7
Posted 03 November 2012 - 12:52 AM
#8
Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:06 AM
Williams isn't a speedster lol. But Thompson isn't ready.they should give these speedsters couple of touches on offense, like Thompson and Laquan williams, they will be matched up with either a slow Safety or 3rd string CB, since we having trouble with separation u might is will give these guys a chance,
Love it....when a crazy starts talking jibberish, we're like vultures
#9
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:57 AM
No More Excuses!!!!!!!
#10
Posted 03 November 2012 - 07:03 AM
i think it is because most of the guys in here including myself like deonte. He had a great camp and preseason. he is on the team for a reason. he will get his chances on offense. look how rarely doss sees the field on offense.
for now it is boldin, smith and jones as the first three. they are doing a good job so far. right now there is no need to throw someone in.
#11
Posted 03 November 2012 - 08:09 AM
Second team players have unique skills that can catch an opposing team by surprise since there is little or no film on them to study.
#12
Posted 03 November 2012 - 08:17 AM
When our passing offense goes 3& out so often, you really dont have much of a chance to give backups a chance, much less starters.
The hope is that going forward the 3 and outs will diminish and provide opportunity for more player involvement. Otherwise this thread is for nothing.
#13
Posted 03 November 2012 - 08:34 AM
He hasn't had a chance to play because he's not as good/reliable as the guys we have out there. Simple.
Most believe Doss has proven himself but we rarely see him. It's hard to believe the Ravens or any team makes a habit of dressing players on game day that can't be trusted enough to play. I see this as a problem with flexibility more than reliability.
#14
Posted 03 November 2012 - 10:35 AM
He hasn't had a chance to play because he's not as good/reliable as the guys we have out there. Simple.
Yeah that's the reason. It's the reason why Antwan Barnes sat as well. It was because we had so many great passrushers playing ahead of him. Good thing we are doing so well at getting to the QB. Don't really need all of those sacks that Barnes is getting in SD.
#15
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:01 AM
Yeah that's the reason. It's the reason why Antwan Barnes sat as well. It was because we had so many great passrushers playing ahead of him. Good thing we are doing so well at getting to the QB. Don't really need all of those sacks that Barnes is getting in SD.
Yes, how will we replace Antwan Barnes' one sack and five tackles?

"Bring it. They want physical. They want to run against us. You know we'll be there."
#16
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:03 AM
#17
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:07 AM
The OC for the saints must drool over our receiving core...or bang his head against the wall trying to understand how we don't put up 35 points/game.
Who is he salivating over and how are they better than what he has? I'd say Torrey Smith is the only one who is better than what they currently have. I bet Cameron is drooling over the Saints OL

"Bring it. They want physical. They want to run against us. You know we'll be there."
#18
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:09 AM
#19
Posted 03 November 2012 - 11:30 AM
I just find the Saints manage to take in no name guys with physical tools and develop them into ballers.Who is he salivating over and how are they better than what he has? I'd say Torrey Smith is the only one who is better than what they currently have. I bet Cameron is drooling over the Saints OL
Lance Moore - Undrafted
Devry Henderson - Round 2
Marques Colston - Round 7
Courtney Roby - Round 3
You could also throw in the Colts/Packers/Patriots...a majority of all their skill position guys are taken past round 3, and they make them into all stars. Mind you it helps and may be fairly coincidental that those 4 teams also have the 4 best QB's on them; however, if Flacco wants money like the big boys, he better start using the tools we've provided him.
#20
Posted 03 November 2012 - 12:26 PM
I just find the Saints manage to take in no name guys with physical tools and develop them into ballers.
Lance Moore - Undrafted
Devry Henderson - Round 2
Marques Colston - Round 7
Courtney Roby - Round 3
You could also throw in the Colts/Packers/Patriots...a majority of all their skill position guys are taken past round 3, and they make them into all stars. Mind you it helps and may be fairly coincidental that those 4 teams also have the 4 best QB's on them; however, if Flacco wants money like the big boys, he better start using the tools we've provided him.
Who on the Patriots/Packers/Colts are you referring to, specifically? The majority of those guys were not taken past round 3. Also draft status does not always equate to talent in the pros.

"Bring it. They want physical. They want to run against us. You know we'll be there."
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















