Upcoming: Beach Bash      Monster Jam      Gold Cup Soccer      JAY Z & Justin Timberlake   

Jump to content


Photo

Should Ray Rice get more carries?


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

Poll: Should Ray Rice get more carries? (39 member(s) have cast votes)

Should Ray Rice get more carries?

  1. Yes (15 votes [38.46%])

    Percentage of vote: 38.46%

  2. No (19 votes [48.72%])

    Percentage of vote: 48.72%

  3. Undecided (5 votes [12.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.82%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 tctony

tctony

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 900 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lewes,DE

Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:00 PM

On average he will rush 16 times per game for 84 yards (5 yd average). He will also catch about 4.5 per game for 38 yds receiving (8.3 yd average). His final stat line will look like this: 20.8 touches, 121.8 yards

Do you think Ray Rice should be utilized more?

Edited by tctony, 12 October 2012 - 01:00 PM.

  • 0

GO RAVENS!

Posted Image


#2 arnie_uk

arnie_uk

    Like a Boss!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,365 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:03 PM

Depends on the situation on game day, also depends if the reduced touches are going to pierce or are we throwing too much. As long as we have a decent run pass situation, we will be ok.

I was a big proponent of giving rice less touches so he can be a full pace come play off time, as well as pro longing his career, and so far pierce looks like he can handle extra touches than a normal back up.
  • 4
WELCOME TO SIZZLEVILLE

#3 tctony

tctony

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 900 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lewes,DE

Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:05 PM

Keep in mind it is a long season and we want a "fresh" Ray Rice in the playoffs. Teams like the Texans are wearing down their top RBs early and who knows how they'll feel come playoff time.

Bernard Pierce has shown potential as well as a compliment to RR.

You can argue that he is only getting 16 carries, but adding in the receptions he is still getting about 20 touches per game. We have enough other talented players that we don't have to be dependent on Ray Rice like we were in 08-10. And if we ever need to go to a gameplan where Ray Rice carries the load, it won't be predictable.

Edited by tctony, 12 October 2012 - 01:06 PM.

  • 5

#4 The Raven

The Raven

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,838 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:11 PM

I think we need to keep Rice fresh for later in the year. I'd like to see more of Pierce and maybe even Allen once in a blue moon. I want Pierce to get more carries. He can rough a defense up more than Rice which can make a difference in tight games. I'd like the rushes to increase (if the flow of the game allows), but give them to Pierce. He's just so great at running behind his pads and making explosive cuts.
  • 2

#5 arnie_uk

arnie_uk

    Like a Boss!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,365 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:24 PM

All in agreement so far. Better to keep him fresher now for when the bad weather and playoffs kick in...
  • 0
WELCOME TO SIZZLEVILLE

#6 The Raven

The Raven

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,838 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:28 PM

All in agreement so far. Better to keep him fresher now for when the bad weather and playoffs kick in...


Keeping him fresh isn't even the sole reason for my wanting to keep his carries down. I think Pierce can be a weapon as well and I'd like to see him used more.
  • 1




#7 poescrows

poescrows

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 287 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The "Dena"

Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:44 PM

On average he will rush 16 times per game for 84 yards (5 yd average). He will also catch about 4.5 per game for 38 yds receiving (8.3 yd average). His final stat line will look like this: 20.8 touches, 121.8 yards

Do you think Ray Rice should be utilized more?

.....good homework, and with those numbers, if/when we do go run heavy the D won't be expecting it.
  • 1
Hey Steeler fans......we now have 2 rings. One for each middle finger! TADA GAN IARRACHT

#8 DocMartin

DocMartin

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,059 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland

Posted 12 October 2012 - 02:14 PM

It depends on game time situations. When we are ahead on scoreboard, yes. But I prefer to use Leach and Pierce in short distance 3rd down, possibly using Rice as decoy to draw defenders. Our 3rd down conversion rate needs to improve, if we consider ourselves Super Bowl Contenders. We have tough schedule ahead, controllling the clock will be important.
  • 1
Pass interference is the worst penalty in football.

If you poke somebody's eyeball out, you get a a 15-yard penalty.

If you make "contact" with the receiver, it could be 60 yards

(70 yards if you have QB Joe Flacco) and an automatic 1st down.

Makes a lot of sense.

Welcome to the new NFL.

#9 Ravenslifer

Ravenslifer

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,769 posts

Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:15 PM

I feel like 20-25 touches a game is about right for most game situations, whether he's running it or catching it. Obviously as it gets colder we've traditionally gone to a more run-oriented style, so I expect the rushing attempts to go up when we need them to. The other thing you have to consider is his YA - in every single game except Cleveland, Rice has averaged more than 5 yards a carry. If he gets just 15 carries a game but churns close to 100 yards out of it, I'd say he's being used pretty effectively.
  • 1

#10 NaveSenrag

NaveSenrag

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,033 posts

Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:46 PM

Ray Rice isn't the keystone of the offense anymore, and he doesn't need to be treated like it. I'd like to see 25 carries between Rice and Pierce together, and however many dump offs Rice gets are left up to Joe. We don't need to run the ball every down anymore, and so we should try to work with our new strength. Use Rice and Pierce to scare the defense and keep them honest, then go for the throat with the passing attack.
  • 1

#11 K-Dog

K-Dog

    MVP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,401 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Millersville Maryland

Posted 12 October 2012 - 07:18 PM

Depends on the situation on game day, also depends if the reduced touches are going to pierce or are we throwing too much. As long as we have a decent run pass situation, we will be ok.

I was a big proponent of giving rice less touches so he can be a full pace come play off time, as well as pro longing his career, and so far pierce looks like he can handle extra touches than a normal back up.


I agree 100%
Although I am assuming when you say "passing too much" it is to mean ineffective passing.
I mean if Joe passes and get a first down on every pass and marches down the field and gets a TD than give Ray Rice a lemonade and let him chill.
yes I know that is pretty unrealistic, but my point is, IF the passing game is working and effective, I dont care how many touches Rice gets. Reality is the run game helps open the door on the passing game most of the time. I know that. The run to pass ratio is always on a case by case basis.
  • 1
K-Dog

"Animals want to learn how to talk so they can hang out with me." Ray Lewis




#12 omar586

omar586

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,370 posts

Posted 12 October 2012 - 07:53 PM

25 touches (8 catching and 17 rushing) are about right for RR, i would like him rush the ball more in certain games or situations or when he gets hot or whens he's averaging like 7 yards a pop, but i think they should get the younger guys involved quickly , so if someone has a bad game, the next man up steps, like the other teams are doing like the Pats anyone can run the ball in pats offense, or steelers they have guys they guys that never heard of that running the ball or catching.they should give pierce like 8 touches too
  • 1

#13 display name

display name

    Ravenous Raven

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,545 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:34 PM

It generally takes pressure off the defense.
Not that I don't trust Flacco, but when we have a guy averaging 5.2 yards a carry with the best FB in the league blocking for him, don't risk a pick and hand off the friggin ball a little more!
Edit: But send in Pierce here and there, we don't want to tire Rice out too much.Pierce will make the defense tired.
I guess I'm in favor of running the ball more, but with Pierce involved as well, because again, we want Rice to be fresh down the stretch.

Edited by display name, 12 October 2012 - 08:37 PM.

  • 1
Raylentless

The Raven, on 03 January 2012 - 05:24 PM said:
"You have reached your quota of negative votes for the day"


#14 Alexir

Alexir

    Dark Wings, Dark Words

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,730 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Crownsville,MD

Posted 13 October 2012 - 08:12 AM

We need to run him more because he is our best offensive player. Our passing game struggled so much and rice was going off 6 yards a rush. He had a 100 yard game where are passing game mustered 187 yards. Run to pass.
  • 1

Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose.
Rings don't lie.
PSN Alexir23


#15 The Raven

The Raven

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,838 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 October 2012 - 10:27 AM

We need to run him more because he is our best offensive player. Our passing game struggled so much and rice was going off 6 yards a rush. He had a 100 yard game where are passing game mustered 187 yards. Run to pass.


This is a valid point. It could definitely be argued that he should receive more carries. I believe he's only had one game with less than a 5.2 yard per carry average. The amount of runs needs to be increased to help the passing game. When Rice is hitting such a consistently high average, he needs the ball more. Though, I am more in favor of giving Pierce additional rushes instead of giving Rice more.
  • 1

#16 Mr. Irrelevant

Mr. Irrelevant

    Wanted Dead or Alive

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,197 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Down in the Gates of Hell

Posted 13 October 2012 - 12:35 PM

I voted yes, but I think he should get more receptions from Joe.
  • 1

We now have one ring for each middle finger


May shame rain down upon you from the heavens for the dastardly deed that hast been done!





#17 Brandon88

Brandon88

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 31 posts

Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:26 AM

If Ray Rice gets more carries it opens up the Play Action and passing game
  • 1

#18 cobrajet

cobrajet

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,043 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Baltimore

Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:56 AM

That depends on a lot of things. If we are going against a weak run defense and Rice gets on fire, then run Ray all day. If we are going against a tem with a week pass rush or weak secondary and Joe is on fire, then maybe not so much. I am a matchup guy who likes to go with a healthy dose of which is ever working on game day. Therefore I voted - Undecided.

With that said, I agree with Mr. Irrelevant, I would like to see Ray get a few more touched in the passing game.

Edited by cobrajet, 14 October 2012 - 09:59 AM.

  • 1

#19 arnie_uk

arnie_uk

    Like a Boss!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,365 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:07 AM

This is a valid point. It could definitely be argued that he should receive more carries. I believe he's only had one game with less than a 5.2 yard per carry average. The amount of runs needs to be increased to help the passing game. When Rice is hitting such a consistently high average, he needs the ball more. Though, I am more in favor of giving Pierce additional rushes instead of giving Rice more.

is he getting the high yardage average because he's fresher, rested and maybe the d is more zoned in on our passing attack due to the numbers we are putting up thus far.

Catch 22. We could begin to go back to smash mouth football and his numbers could drop because of the higher workload and then the defense will clue in on him more.

Then fans will be calling for Joe to throw more. Each game is a new one, they have to be looked at individually. Go with what's working without abandoning the other.

You can't qualify this to a simple yes or a no
  • 1
WELCOME TO SIZZLEVILLE

#20 redrum52

redrum52

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,273 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:13 AM

No. I think Rice is getting enough. I wouldn't mind seeing Pierce in more though. I think the plan is to save Rice for the post season. When it gets cold I predict a heavy dose of the running game. We don't only want to keep him healthy for this season but the rest of his career in Baltimore.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users