Was our win verses the Chiefs a good sign?
#1
Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:24 AM
We made great halftime adjustments and stuffed the run and our D was just intense. The offense however had some issues in all areas but all teams have those days just ask any Green Bay player.
#2
Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:47 AM
#3
Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:54 AM
"Your a joke." -Mr. GM
#4
Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:00 PM
#5
Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:01 PM
I love close games and a blow away is far less entertaining.
Can't agree with that 100%. Our blowout of the Steelers last year is one of the best times I ever had at the stadium.
#6
Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:02 PM
#7
Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:03 PM
When you Play as Bad as you can an still Win the Game it says something about your Team.
It might say more about how bad that other team was.
#8
Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:05 PM
Can't agree with that 100%. Our blowout of the Steelers last year is one of the best times I ever had at the stadium.
Same with beating Cincy this yr.
I've seen enough close games because of lack of offense
Now I want us to dismantle teams and show dominance all around.
Games like that can be fun.
A game like what the offense did week 1 and a defense performance like what we did to NYj the last time we played would still be a good game to watch.
#9
Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:06 PM
Don't think it's a good signLast year we lost those games. Yesterday we won. Good sign.
Yes we won but it still makes it look like we play down to the opponents instead of mentally being focus and producing
#10
Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:31 PM
Here are the bright spots though:
Special Teams was ON POINT. Koch had a few monster punts, the coverage teams on kickoffs and punts were great, and Tucker was perfect.
Flacco IMO played very well outside of taking a few sacks, looking back at a few of them though, they had arms on him before he could actually throw it away so a few of those were on the Oline too. He can't throw AND catch the ball. If receivers don't drop 3 of those balls, He could have potentially been in the 250 yds range because all of them were likely to be a 1st down.
Rice quietly had a big game on the ground..over 100 yds on only 16 carries.
Leach had a great game blocking
There is definitely room for improvement on Offense still, but we've already seen what Torrey, Q, and Jacoby can do and I have faith that they'll get back on track.
DEFENSE: Kruger had probably his most solid game of the year. The stats after the first half were disgusting, but we made the adjustments at halftime and shut them down after that.. That would be the only silver lining on D other than the Secondary played well.
So here's my final take on it. BAD teams lose games like that. We couldn't catch passes, we ran ENOUGH but we couldn't get into the end zone, penalites on offense ect.. but we found a way at the end of the game to put it away when it looked like Quinn might actually have some more success passing than Cassel did. Again, KC is a pro football team too that gets paid to win games, so ON THE ROAD, despite all of the mistakes we came out with the W. I'll take it happily.
#11
Posted 08 October 2012 - 02:34 PM
Edited by Ravenslifer, 09 October 2012 - 09:39 PM.
#12
Posted 08 October 2012 - 02:36 PM
#13
Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:15 PM
If Joe could throw to Joe then our offense would be amazing. Joe throwing to a 6'6 240+ pound target would be awesome.Flacco IMO played very well outside of taking a few sacks, looking back at a few of them though, they had arms on him before he could actually throw it away so a few of those were on the Oline too. He can't throw AND catch the ball. If receivers don't drop 3 of those balls, He could have potentially been in the 250 yds range because all of them were likely to be a 1st down.
Though it would be the most awkward-running looking WR ever.
"No weapon. No weapon formed against this team shall prosper.” #GoRavens
Win or lose, I believe.
#14
Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:42 PM
Scientists tell us that the fastest animal on Earth, with a top speed of 120 feet-per-second, is a cow that has been dropped out of a helicopter.
Entropy just isn't what it used to be.
Never, under any circumstances, take sleeping pills and a laxative on the same night.
#15
Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:49 PM
#16
Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:50 PM
9 playoff wins
3 AFC Championship game appearances
1 AFC Championship
1 Super Bowl Title
1 Super Bowl MVP
Keep Hating Media. Keep Hating.
#17
Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:54 PM
#18
Posted 08 October 2012 - 04:55 PM
Well considering that we would have lost that game last year, I guess so.
We did lose that exact game. It was @ JAX and that late touchdown wasn't called back lol.
#19
Posted 08 October 2012 - 05:39 PM
With the Cowboys we play against a team, that tries to come back from a horrible loss and wants to prove, that they are a good team, while the Ravens just fought for one of the ugliest victories ever and want to prove, that they can do better. Book it. Cowboys at Ravens will be the best game of this season.
#20
Posted 08 October 2012 - 05:46 PM
This.We did lose that exact game. It was @ JAX and that late touchdown wasn't called back lol.
We have improved (so far) on the perceived let down games. It may not be pretty, but getting the W when we otherwise may have gotten an L is a gross understatement of what we have improved in.
Older Raven teams would have caved and allowed Charles, Bowe to score.
Heck ,the only one we lost - the Eagles game - can be attributed to the incorrect nullification of Jacoby's 2nd TD.
"No weapon. No weapon formed against this team shall prosper.” #GoRavens
Win or lose, I believe.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















