Upcoming: Beach Bash      Monster Jam      Gold Cup Soccer      JAY Z & Justin Timberlake   

Jump to content


Photo

A reason why McKinnie is not starting...


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 Corvus Amplus

Corvus Amplus

    MVP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:About 4500 ft. Up

Posted 27 September 2012 - 04:40 AM

http://russellstreet...-and-1-attempt/

The article and pictures say it all.

Now we know why that 4th and 1 failed because McKinnie whiffed on everything.
  • 5

-----------------------------------th_FUN_INSURED-BY-MAFIA.jpg--------------------crawling_bug.gif

 

Sin City Mafia Expansion Draft Selections:

32. Duane Brown - LT

33. Clay Matthews - OLB/DE

97. 

98. 


#2 raybaby

raybaby

    MVP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,800 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 September 2012 - 04:57 AM

Luckily we're able to laugh at this. If we lost though..smh.
  • 0

#3 Moderator 6

Moderator 6

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,903 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 27 September 2012 - 05:50 AM

That's what I thought I saw. If McKinne took that guy on, Leach would have gone through untouched, not to mention Pierce. Should have been a 3+ yard gain.
  • 0
Posted Image
"Don't stop hunting until you have 'em on your wall" - Ray Lewis

#4 BloodRaven

BloodRaven

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,048 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:00 AM

Watching him closely last season this is actually an accurate representation of his run blocking, he's not aggressive. Also with the play in question it looks like he fired out in the wrong direction when he should have slanted left and washed Chung across the field.
  • 0

tt34rJo.png


#5 EricH

EricH

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hanover, PA

Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:20 AM

I wondered what happened on that play. They didn't show a replay during the game.
But it appeared McKinnie did a whole bunch of nothing.
  • 0

#6 Brandon72

Brandon72

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 21 posts

Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:31 AM

I guess Micheal Oher is better for the protection because last year mckinnie couldnt block woodley or harrison i think Oher is quicker faster and provides better protection than mckinnie
  • 0




#7 Moderator 3

Moderator 3

    Hall of Famer

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,507 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:33 AM

They did focus on that play in the Replay on NFLN last night. We were commenting on how McKinnie just stood there like a doofus. If he had blocked anyone we probably would have converted. We're now convinced the FO made the right decision.
  • 1
Posted Image

#8 Medications

Medications

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 452 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Annapolis, MD

Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:41 AM

Yeah i noticed this exact thing last night on the NFLN Replay, i even paused it and rewinded (DVR) and watched it in slow motion and said the same thing, if McKinnie blocked Chung like it looked like he was supposed to then thats a gain
  • 0
- Ryan |Posted Image | Posted Image

#9 3-4ravdef509

3-4ravdef509

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 676 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:York, PA

Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:50 AM

WOW....that's all I got to say there.
Gotta say I had my doubts about the line, but three games in they've impressed.
  • 0

#10 BloodRaven

BloodRaven

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,048 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:08 AM

We need more draft picks like Osemele, athletic and powerful with length.
  • 2

tt34rJo.png


#11 1/28/01

1/28/01

    Error 404

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,134 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glen Arm, MD

Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:29 AM

Yup; fat, slow and clueless!
  • 0
Posted Image




#12 ravensfan160

ravensfan160

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,093 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Felton, PA

Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:37 AM

I saw it during the game. McKinnie is worthless.
  • 0

#13 Alexir

Alexir

    Dark Wings, Dark Words

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Crownsville,MD

Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:56 AM

When I saw that live, I was like WTH is he thinking?!?! He has to know his assignment is the outside guy!

I think Ozzie dropped the ball. We should of just cut him because even if he is depth, when it is time to shine, he isn't motivated and doesnt care. He is already paid.

I'll take an undrafted free agent scrub LT over McKinnie any day of the week. He doesn't deserve to be in that lockerroom.
  • 0

Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose.
Rings don't lie.
PSN Alexir23


#14 Ray The Day

Ray The Day

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 952 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vienna, Austria

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:16 AM

As far as I can tell, it looked like the blitzing LB who blew up the play was on harewood
I guess Cam had it drawn up like this:
Before leachs short motion:
mckinnie and oher have a double team on the end with mckinnie leading up to the playside LB, harewood and birk had a double team on the nose with harewood leading up to the backside LB, yanda and KO had angle blocks to the left. That would leave chung for leach to get some lunch
After leachs short motion:
the blocking, as you would guess, stays the same, but the playside LB had a called blitz, that would have lead to harewood helping out birk on the DT with one hand until the playside LB shoots into his gap, he can then either decide to cut him or just try to fill the gap, as harewood didnt see the blitz coming. the playside LB shoots through. Now mckinnie didnt have anyone to block as his LB was blitzing in the b gap. Leach now had the LB to block or could have taken chung on the outside, either way one player would have made the tackle

so in my opinion it was harewoods fault not mckinnies

Edited by Ray The Day, 27 September 2012 - 08:19 AM.

  • 0
2013 BR.COM FORUM MOCK DRAFT: HOUSTON TEXANS GM

#15 Ravensfan23

Ravensfan23

    Hall of Famer

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,193 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Baltimore

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:55 AM

That break down is nice and all, but unless it came from a coach with knowledge of what "exactly" was supposed to happen, there is no way of knowing what really happened.

Looking at the play live, i thought the LB just did a great job of timing his blitz, shooting the gap and disrupting the play. The breakdown says that McKinnie turned right for no reason. Imo he didn't. From the looks of the play, McKinnie was supposed to block down on the ILB and Leach was supposed to get the kick out block on the outside man.

At the snap, the ILB blitz making it impossible for McKinnie to reach him. If you watch the play closely it looks like Leach's first step was to the outside, but he quickly changed direction to block the ILB coming free. Now unless Leach was giving a jab step, i highly doubt this was intentional.

Where i do think McKinnie failed at was to double down on Jones with oher then getting to the second level, but again, unless a coach breaks it down, we just dont know
  • 0
Posted Image

#16 DoctorBondurs

DoctorBondurs

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 30 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:58 AM

Yeah but he could have tried to block someone , thats the thing he didnt even try to slow anyone down. all he did was look around. Doesnt matter if it wasnt supposed to be his block. ONE play he comes in and he does nothing. like every run play last year. He easily could have blocked someone. but he stood there.

Edited by DoctorBondurs, 27 September 2012 - 08:59 AM.

  • 0




#17 PuRock

PuRock

    Skull Grinder

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,109 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:02 AM

Yup; fat, slow and clueless!


Somewhat of the same words that were going to come out of my mouth!

He's just old and ineffective. He's got the size, but that's about all he's got going for him anymore.
  • 0
Posted Image

#18 Purple Punishment

Purple Punishment

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,733 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:RavensTown, Md

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:07 AM

Shoulda put an ice cream truck in the end zone, he would have destroyed the defensive line to get there
  • 1
"Im Pissed Off For Greatness" -Ray Lewis



PSN: RobtasticVoyage

#19 PuRock

PuRock

    Skull Grinder

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,109 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:09 AM

Shoulda put an ice cream truck in the end zone, he would have destroyed the defensive line to get there


Or tell him the entrance to the club is down there (and I heard the DJ is going to let him guest spin).
  • 0
Posted Image

#20 Blackbirds Rule

Blackbirds Rule

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 394 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:10 AM

As far as I can tell, it looked like the blitzing LB who blew up the play was on harewood
I guess Cam had it drawn up like this:
Before leachs short motion:
mckinnie and oher have a double team on the end with mckinnie leading up to the playside LB, harewood and birk had a double team on the nose with harewood leading up to the backside LB, yanda and KO had angle blocks to the left. That would leave chung for leach to get some lunch
After leachs short motion:
the blocking, as you would guess, stays the same, but the playside LB had a called blitz, that would have lead to harewood helping out birk on the DT with one hand until the playside LB shoots into his gap, he can then either decide to cut him or just try to fill the gap, as harewood didnt see the blitz coming. the playside LB shoots through. Now mckinnie didnt have anyone to block as his LB was blitzing in the b gap. Leach now had the LB to block or could have taken chung on the outside, either way one player would have made the tackle

so in my opinion it was harewoods fault not mckinnies


It was someone's missed assignment. The play originally may have been to block the way that you set it up. I think that McKinnie was supposed to make the adjustment on the line. When you saw the linebacker creeping up to blitz they should have allowed Leach to pick him up. Harewood and Birk would have to double Wilfork because with just Birk on him he would have gotten push back towards Pierce. If McKinnie would have put a hand on Chung Pierce has a 4 yard gain at least for the first down. Now since McKinnie hasn't been playing as much he may simply not read that the lb was blitzing and thought he would make it to the second level to get him but on a 4th and 1 when everyone knows you're running to the unbalanced side of the line you take the guy in front or closest to you which everyone did except McKinnie. There is no second level on a 4th and 1 you need one yard just put a hat on a person and let your back get the one yard.
  • 0
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users