A reason why McKinnie is not starting...
#1
Posted 27 September 2012 - 04:40 AM
The article and pictures say it all.
Now we know why that 4th and 1 failed because McKinnie whiffed on everything.
-----------------------------------
--------------------
Sin City Mafia Expansion Draft Selections:
32. Duane Brown - LT
33. Clay Matthews - OLB/DE
97.
98.
#2
Posted 27 September 2012 - 04:57 AM
#3
Posted 27 September 2012 - 05:50 AM

"Don't stop hunting until you have 'em on your wall" - Ray Lewis
#4
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:00 AM
#5
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:20 AM
But it appeared McKinnie did a whole bunch of nothing.
#6
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:31 AM
#7
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:33 AM
#8
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:41 AM
|
#9
Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:50 AM
Gotta say I had my doubts about the line, but three games in they've impressed.
#10
Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:08 AM
#11
Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:29 AM
#12
Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:37 AM
#13
Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:56 AM
I think Ozzie dropped the ball. We should of just cut him because even if he is depth, when it is time to shine, he isn't motivated and doesnt care. He is already paid.
I'll take an undrafted free agent scrub LT over McKinnie any day of the week. He doesn't deserve to be in that lockerroom.
Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose.
Rings don't lie.
PSN Alexir23
#14
Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:16 AM
I guess Cam had it drawn up like this:
Before leachs short motion:
mckinnie and oher have a double team on the end with mckinnie leading up to the playside LB, harewood and birk had a double team on the nose with harewood leading up to the backside LB, yanda and KO had angle blocks to the left. That would leave chung for leach to get some lunch
After leachs short motion:
the blocking, as you would guess, stays the same, but the playside LB had a called blitz, that would have lead to harewood helping out birk on the DT with one hand until the playside LB shoots into his gap, he can then either decide to cut him or just try to fill the gap, as harewood didnt see the blitz coming. the playside LB shoots through. Now mckinnie didnt have anyone to block as his LB was blitzing in the b gap. Leach now had the LB to block or could have taken chung on the outside, either way one player would have made the tackle
so in my opinion it was harewoods fault not mckinnies
Edited by Ray The Day, 27 September 2012 - 08:19 AM.
#15
Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:55 AM
Looking at the play live, i thought the LB just did a great job of timing his blitz, shooting the gap and disrupting the play. The breakdown says that McKinnie turned right for no reason. Imo he didn't. From the looks of the play, McKinnie was supposed to block down on the ILB and Leach was supposed to get the kick out block on the outside man.
At the snap, the ILB blitz making it impossible for McKinnie to reach him. If you watch the play closely it looks like Leach's first step was to the outside, but he quickly changed direction to block the ILB coming free. Now unless Leach was giving a jab step, i highly doubt this was intentional.
Where i do think McKinnie failed at was to double down on Jones with oher then getting to the second level, but again, unless a coach breaks it down, we just dont know
#16
Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:58 AM
Edited by DoctorBondurs, 27 September 2012 - 08:59 AM.
#17
Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:02 AM
Yup; fat, slow and clueless!
Somewhat of the same words that were going to come out of my mouth!
He's just old and ineffective. He's got the size, but that's about all he's got going for him anymore.
#18
Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:07 AM
PSN: RobtasticVoyage
#19
Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:09 AM
Shoulda put an ice cream truck in the end zone, he would have destroyed the defensive line to get there
Or tell him the entrance to the club is down there (and I heard the DJ is going to let him guest spin).
#20
Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:10 AM
As far as I can tell, it looked like the blitzing LB who blew up the play was on harewood
I guess Cam had it drawn up like this:
Before leachs short motion:
mckinnie and oher have a double team on the end with mckinnie leading up to the playside LB, harewood and birk had a double team on the nose with harewood leading up to the backside LB, yanda and KO had angle blocks to the left. That would leave chung for leach to get some lunch
After leachs short motion:
the blocking, as you would guess, stays the same, but the playside LB had a called blitz, that would have lead to harewood helping out birk on the DT with one hand until the playside LB shoots into his gap, he can then either decide to cut him or just try to fill the gap, as harewood didnt see the blitz coming. the playside LB shoots through. Now mckinnie didnt have anyone to block as his LB was blitzing in the b gap. Leach now had the LB to block or could have taken chung on the outside, either way one player would have made the tackle
so in my opinion it was harewoods fault not mckinnies
It was someone's missed assignment. The play originally may have been to block the way that you set it up. I think that McKinnie was supposed to make the adjustment on the line. When you saw the linebacker creeping up to blitz they should have allowed Leach to pick him up. Harewood and Birk would have to double Wilfork because with just Birk on him he would have gotten push back towards Pierce. If McKinnie would have put a hand on Chung Pierce has a 4 yard gain at least for the first down. Now since McKinnie hasn't been playing as much he may simply not read that the lb was blitzing and thought he would make it to the second level to get him but on a 4th and 1 when everyone knows you're running to the unbalanced side of the line you take the guy in front or closest to you which everyone did except McKinnie. There is no second level on a 4th and 1 you need one yard just put a hat on a person and let your back get the one yard.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















