How can we fix our D?!
#1
Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:30 AM
Any suggestions?
#2
Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:34 AM
31st pick: Alec Ogletree 32nd pick: Justin Hunter 63rd pick: D.J. Swearinger
76th pick: Bennie Logan 88th pick 161st pick
168th pick 184th pick 202nd pick
229th pick 239th pick
#3
Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:36 AM
boy I miss Suggs.

#4
Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:38 AM
#5
Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:40 AM
#6
Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:49 AM
Maybe we should add another DE instead of inside linebacker for the starting team...
Now THAT is a good idea... Seems like if we are better suited personel wise to run a 4-3?
Is Carter still available?
I wouldn't mind that either, we really miss Redding and JJ...
#7
Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:57 AM
SUPER BOWL CHAMPS!!!
#8
Posted 18 September 2012 - 11:39 AM
Its not just missing a pass rush... We are giving up underneath routes, and worst of all, not even stopping the run!
Any suggestions?
They held McCoy to 81 yards on 25 carries and the Eagles as a team to 3.1 yards per carry.
I put in another post that the Ravens had been elite at covering TE over the last 17 regular season games prior to Celek's blowup. TE are seldom a problem for the Ravens.
It really seems that the Ravens LB and Secondary were very focused on Vick's threat of running along with the big play potential of Maclin/McCoy/Jackson. When you review the film, you notice that our LB would let Celek go once he got to a certain depth and Vick happened to be throwing to him between the LB and the Secondary.
I am more concerned with getting consistent pressure on the QB. Vick had all day to throw. That fact, along with the zone coverage the LB/Secondary were playing were the reason the Ravens got carved up.
"Your a joke." -Mr. GM
#9
Posted 18 September 2012 - 11:56 AM
1) Pollard clearly set the defensive tone for the Eagles game. When he went out with an injury it seemed like our defense went flat. How does a defense with Ray Lewis go flat? Is this a glimpse of our defense when Ray retires????
2) With Nagta getting double teamed and still getting to the ball, what the hell is Cody doing? My big issue with Cody is on run plays. No run should be successful inside the tackles. When Nagta is double teamed Cody should be eating runners up.
3) Why in the hell does Jimmy Smith, a 6'2" 210lbs CB, continue to play 8 and 10 yards off of WRs? We drafted him because of his size so he could get in the face of the large WRs in the game today. If I were the other team's Offesive coordinator, I'd throw 5 and 7 yard outs and curls to Jimmy Smith's side all game long.
4) I know the Suggs injury was big, but right now our best pass rusher is Webb. That's just not good enough. Where's the next man up?
5) Even with a poor offensive showing in the second half we put up 23 points. In years past, 23 points was an assured victory. Throw in the fact we also had a turn over advantage and I'm left scratching my head. Are we seeing the effects of our new Defensive coordinator?
Football is not a contact sport, it is a collision sport. Dancing is a contact sport. - Duffy Daugherty
#10
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:02 PM
#11
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:06 PM
Edited by Ed_Reed20, 18 September 2012 - 12:07 PM.

ER20 takes off and then gets distracted by a debate going on...
#12
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:10 PM
#13
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:44 PM
In all seriousness, I am partial to man coverage with safety help over the top as a basic concept as the Eagles ran some of on Sunday. I think Webb is good enough to do that and Jimmy will get better at it as he gets more experience and if he learns to stop playing 5+ yards off of every receiver. When we drop guys into zones, we need to be mixing up blitzes with the other guys that aren't dropping, make it less "vanilla." I saw the Falcons doing some "organized chaos" type stuff last night and it makes me miss those days with our defense...
Edited by Corvus, 18 September 2012 - 12:49 PM.
#14
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:49 PM
#15
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:22 PM
Now THAT is a good idea... Seems like if we are better suited personel wise to run a 4-3?
The way Pees runs the defense, it may as well already be a 4-3. I mean, what do we typically do? Rush 4, drop everyone else back. Isn't that what most 4-3 teams do? Changing the scheme won't change the fact that we can't get pressure. Whether we run a 4-3 or a 3-4, the players would be the same. Kruger and Upshaw would still be the primary pass rushers. Nothing would change except for alignments. The personnel would be the same.
Edited by The Raven, 18 September 2012 - 01:22 PM.
#16
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:30 PM
#17
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:32 PM
This. Big corners never play particularly well in off coverage unless they are the cream of the crop. The Ravens wanted to be physical at the LOS, so they picked JSmith in the 1st only to play him 10 yards off? Where he struggled in college no less too?Start taking advantage of Jimmy Smith and Cary Williams size in press coverage, they're getting torched anyway.
Makes sense.
#18
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:33 PM
Theres 2 guys over 30.I think the D is going to struggle at times all year. The D is showing its age but will still be a decent defense just not a top 5 any more.
2.
#19
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:38 PM
#20
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:44 PM
and those 2 guys are your best players on that side of the ball
After Ngata, yes. And Suggs, but I wont count him since he may not play this season.
Can make a very strong case that Suggs, Ngata and Webb are our three best defensive players.
Joe Flacco, Super Bowl 47 MVP
Farewell to a legend. Thanks for the memories, Ray Ray!
If you woke up this morning, congratulations. You got another chance
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















