2 reasons we lost
#1
Posted 17 September 2012 - 08:52 AM
2.) We didn't make the proper adjustments on offense or defense. We should have ran more and used play action, screens, and some bunch formations to get our offense moving. And I blame Joe, Cameron, and Harbs. I didn't like our defense playing such a deep zone. We were leaving Celek wide open because the zones would get spread back.because Vick had plenty of time. I thought we should have put Webb on Maclin, Pollard and Williams on Jackson, and then played Vick and their TEs physical.
Joe should have made adjustments on.the sideline with Cam, and Harbs should have stepped in when it didn't happen. But refs also were killing us. Move on though, we lost week 2 last year and still made it one drop away from Superbowl, I'm not worried yet.
#2
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:06 AM
#3
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:10 AM
#4
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:11 AM
All in all, our boys still gotta get open, I didn't see Boldin much at all lol
#5
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:18 AM
Look, the offense sputtered in the 2nd half because they took the game out of Joe's hands and gave the reins back to Cam. However, our defense was given a 10 pt lead at half-time and a 6 pt lead with only 4 minutes left in the game. Pees and the defense failed this game. I know we love our defense, but that is just fact.
Joe should be man enough to go out there and call his own.plays and not care what Cam wants to do. Sorry, I Love Joe but he can't just hide behind the Can excuse. If he can fo better, than he should. The fact that he doesn't is alarming. The coaches are not going to bench him.for doing his own thing.
#6
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:20 AM
hmm... I can agree with the CB's on our WR's. The corners did stop turning to the ball in the second half.
All in all, our boys still gotta get open, I didn't see Boldin much at all lol
Neither Joe or cam were calling plays designed to help receivers beat tight man to man coverage. Nor were we trying to wear out their linemen or slow down the blitz.
#7
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:21 AM
2.defense
#8
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:25 AM
1.offense
2.defense
The bright side to.that is our special teams looked awesome lol
#9
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:26 AM

"Bring it. They want physical. They want to run against us. You know we'll be there."
#10
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:28 AM
1.offense
2.defense
I disagree.
1. defense
2. offense
Our defense was given a 10 pt lead at the half and a 6 pt lead with only 4 mins left in the game. Not that the offense doesn't share the loss and played spectacular but the defense was given a defensible position with only 4 mins left.
#11
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:37 AM
The defense was just atrocious. I mean obviously we are the Ravens and we play good D, but that was not Ravens level defense yesterday. We honed in on Vick's rushing ability to much and as a result gave up easy points (Maclin TD, Celek in general). WE got pressure and hit Vick, but coverage wise we weren't playing the hard nosed man to man coverage that can take guys like Celek and D jax out of the game.
Offensively what killed us was getting away from the uptempo no huddle. Part of the reason Rice was so effective and the offense in general was clicking was because we took their d line out of the game by tiring them out and not letting them rotate out. In the second half with a lead, we got away from using that. If we are to have any chance of beating the Patriots or any other team, we must run the No Huddle all game and prevent substitution.
The refs of course were atrocious, but they are not the reason we lost the game. They are the reason we were put into a position to lose, but the D had to hold up, and the offensive had to at least get to opponents territory. Instead Philly's D got the best of us. I still believe this is the best team in the afc, but we still suffer from that hangover syndrome after big wins and if we are going to win the big one, we have to get over that.
#12
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:37 AM
I disagree.
1. defense
2. offense
Our defense was given a 10 pt lead at the half and a 6 pt lead with only 4 mins left in the game. Not that the offense doesn't share the loss and played spectacular but the defense was given a defensible position with only 4 mins left.
True, but how many 3 and outs did we have? We could have helped our defense out be staying on the offensive longer. Just saying.
#13
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:53 AM
#14
Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:54 AM
Look, the offense sputtered in the 2nd half because they took the game out of Joe's hands and gave the reins back to Cam. However, our defense was given a 10 pt lead at half-time and a 6 pt lead with only 4 minutes left in the game. Pees and the defense failed this game. I know we love our defense, but that is just fact.
Yes, taking pressure off vick was a mistake at the end, but too many 3 and outs by the offense makes the job much tougher for the defense than it should have been. Our turnovers accounted for 14 of theri points. the INT was especially bad. We're starting to see the olf second half Ravens offense again and it kills us every time. Run the d___ ball Joe/Cam!!!!
#15
Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:03 AM
Tyrod Taylor! What the heck man, you were supposed to emmulate Michael Vick this past week in practice! You gotta prepare us better man! smh
*jokes*
#16
Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:07 AM
#17
Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:10 AM
#18
Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:14 AM
Look, the offense sputtered in the 2nd half because they took the game out of Joe's hands and gave the reins back to Cam. However, our defense was given a 10 pt lead at half-time and a 6 pt lead with only 4 minutes left in the game. Pees and the defense failed this game. I know we love our defense, but that is just fact.
Joe Flacco can audible at any giving time so i dont see how the game was ripped away out of his hand's . Flacco could had audible to a run play but he and Cam wanted to be so pass happy. Flacco has sees what defense is giving him and we all know he has every right to change a play but he obviously thought plays from cam were fine . i agree with everything else you said about the defense
#19
Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:31 AM
It was in no particular order......I disagree.
1. defense
2. offense
Our defense was given a 10 pt lead at the half and a 6 pt lead with only 4 mins left in the game. Not that the offense doesn't share the loss and played spectacular but the defense was given a defensible position with only 4 mins left.
#20
Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:31 AM
Joe Flacco can audible at any giving time so i dont see how the game was ripped away out of his hand's . Flacco could had audible to a run play but he and Cam wanted to be so pass happy. Flacco has sees what defense is giving him and we all know he has every right to change a play but he obviously thought plays from cam were fine . i agree with everything else you said about the defense
Exactly. I.don't like Cam, and I love Flacco but he is also responsible now
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















