Upcoming: Beach Bash      Monster Jam      Gold Cup Soccer      JAY Z & Justin Timberlake   

Jump to content


Photo

I thought we were doing no hudle, also whats with the play calling in the 2nd half


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1 PSG_Mud

PSG_Mud

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 272 posts

Posted 17 September 2012 - 12:53 AM

First half was great, the Ravens did something to end the over predictability of Ravens playcalling. It seems to me that being predictable is never a good thing in sports, so I had high hopes they would stick to it.

But, why on earth was the play calling run run pass every time we got a new set of downs in the 2nd half. Abandoning the no huddle.

It was absurdly obvious, that the defense was basically in goal line disguises.

Perhaps someone explain it to me why this it was a good idea?

Edited by PSG_Mud, 17 September 2012 - 12:55 AM.

  • 0

#2 bmorefan80

bmorefan80

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 556 posts
  • Location:Charm City

Posted 17 September 2012 - 01:33 AM

I'm not sure what game you were watching, but the Ravens didn't run it that much in the 2nd half. Though, I do wish Ray would've gotten the ball alot more than he did. He was only averaging 6.2 yards/carry on 16 attempts...

The Ravens know they need to feed the ball to Rice 20+ time a game. He is still one of the most dangerous weapons in the NFL.
  • 0

#3 PolishRifle

PolishRifle

    MVP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,524 posts

Posted 17 September 2012 - 01:34 AM

First half was great, the Ravens did something to end the over predictability of Ravens playcalling. It seems to me that being predictable is never a good thing in sports, so I had high hopes they would stick to it.

But, why on earth was the play calling run run pass every time we got a new set of downs in the 2nd half. Abandoning the no huddle.

It was absurdly obvious, that the defense was basically in goal line disguises.

Perhaps someone explain it to me why this it was a good idea?


I loved how we managed to set up run plays with the passing game. It worked great in the first half and there was no good reason to change anything. We had them on the ropes.
  • 0

#4 UMDan

UMDan

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,082 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:College Park, MD

Posted 17 September 2012 - 02:01 AM

I loved how we managed to set up run plays with the passing game. It worked great in the first half and there was no good reason to change anything. We had them on the ropes.


I agree, but I think they figured our offense out and made adjustments on their defense. It was difficult to find open guys in the second half, and Flacco wasn't exactly throwing accurately and going through all of the progressions (perhaps because he was playing hurt). Still, that doesn't explain why Rice didn't get the ball until our third possession in the second half.

Edited by UMDan, 17 September 2012 - 02:02 AM.

  • 0

#5 flaccopoe

flaccopoe

    Mintberry Crunch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,927 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Capital of the World!

Posted 17 September 2012 - 02:19 AM

I agree with the sentiments expressed in this topic. Stick to no-huddle to prevent the d from subbing and don't make stupid play calls!
  • 0

Jay Z will look at you like it's gravy

Hey man, in his defense it's a serious issue.  poe is a noble guardian looking out for us all.

"The day we outlaw trouser ferrets is the day only outlaws will have trouser ferrets." Alex Palmer, cracked.com

#6 omar586

omar586

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,370 posts

Posted 17 September 2012 - 02:24 AM

Not running rice was a mistake . He was breaking big runs on every touch.
  • 0




#7 reediddy

reediddy

    MVP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,052 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego, CA

Posted 17 September 2012 - 03:26 AM

Multiple 3rd and short situations squandered by us trying to pass for a first down. RR needs 25-30 touches a game
  • 0
...right?

Man coverage on Boldin is LOL.


Posted Image

SUPER BOWL CHAMPS 2012-13
I believed it all along too...

#8 NaveSenrag

NaveSenrag

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,023 posts

Posted 17 September 2012 - 08:21 AM

We gave up on the no-huddle in the second half, and it showed. Rice dropped from nearly 10 yards per carry to 2, we couldn't tire out their defense, and when we did they just subbed in new guys (at one point they put in an entirely new line. They knew exactly who to cover, and with whom to cover. I mean, triple coverage on Pitta? They were prepared to handle us, and we weren't prepared to handle them. We locked down the running game, and Vick torched our secondary. They locked down our running game and our passing game.
  • 0

#9 RavensWin09

RavensWin09

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 992 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Perry Hall

Posted 17 September 2012 - 08:32 AM

there is no reason for him to just give up on no huddle in the 2nd half. if you couldn't pass to set up the run, then switch to run to set up the pass, then switch back when they're lured to the run. anyone can take cam's job. he deserves all the blame in the world. there is no reason this offense shouldn't be top 10. Have Oz and Steve even watched the playcalling the last 5 years??
  • 0

#10 terpsnation

terpsnation

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 September 2012 - 08:50 AM

With Philly announcing that they were going to sub defenders, even when we were running no huddle, abandoning it during the 2nd half is probably what cost us the game.

Run a play, then hurry up and give the ball to RR27, or run a passing play and dump it off to him. We should have been able to exploit their subbing the same way we did in the first half, yet for some reason we changed the gameplan and ended up with a L.
  • 0
"I have come to the realization that challenging experiences break us all at some point -- our bodies and minds, our hearts and egos. When we put ourselves back together, we find that we are no longer perfectly straight, but rather bent and cracked. Yet it is through these cracks that our authenticity shines."

- Ping Fu

#11 RavensWin09

RavensWin09

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 992 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Perry Hall

Posted 17 September 2012 - 08:58 AM

cam just keeps giving oz and steve a reason to doubt him and yet why has he been here all this time? why are they willing to give up our good coordinators but hold on forever with the bad ones? please i hope there is a perfect coordinator waiting to picked up next year.
  • 0




#12 jus'_crAzy

jus'_crAzy

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,055 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:D-M-V

Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:09 AM

cam just keeps giving oz and steve a reason to doubt him and yet why has he been here all this time? why are they willing to give up our good coordinators but hold on forever with the bad ones? please i hope there is a perfect coordinator waiting to picked up next year.

Because we keep winning in spite of him. You don't think Mr. Bisciotti hears what we say about Cam Cameron? Hell, Harbs even addressed the criticism of Cam in last week's presser!

They know what we say about him, but as long as we put up wins, they're going to pass it off as a reaction to a loss (which is true in some cases). And then they're gonna hide behind that saying,

"Winning cures everything."

Cam's not going anywhere.

Edited by jus'_crAzy, 17 September 2012 - 09:10 AM.

  • 0

You say bark, I say bite. You say shark, I say "Hey, man! Jaws was never my scene and I don't like Star Wars."

#BOAD

#13 RavensWin09

RavensWin09

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 992 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Perry Hall

Posted 17 September 2012 - 09:33 AM

Because we keep winning in spite of him. You don't think Mr. Bisciotti hears what we say about Cam Cameron? Hell, Harbs even addressed the criticism of Cam in last week's presser!

They know what we say about him, but as long as we put up wins, they're going to pass it off as a reaction to a loss (which is true in some cases). And then they're gonna hide behind that saying,

"Winning cures everything."

Cam's not going anywhere.


winning isn't everything. i doubt they're content with just making the playoffs and having early exits from there b/c someone on the staff is holding the team back every game when if we gets out of the way, we can have week 1 types of games every week. if you underperform, you underperform. the steelers win a lot but where is bruce arians now? he lasted 5 years and this is cams 5th year. he is gone next year.
  • 0

#14 jus'_crAzy

jus'_crAzy

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,055 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:D-M-V

Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:03 AM

winning isn't everything. i doubt they're content with just making the playoffs and having early exits from there b/c someone on the staff is holding the team back every game when if we gets out of the way, we can have week 1 types of games every week. if you underperform, you underperform. the steelers win a lot but where is bruce arians now? he lasted 5 years and this is cams 5th year. he is gone next year.

You can't dispute what's already been said by the front office. It's not me saying those things. You can look up all the pressers that Mr. Bisciotti, Ozzie, and Harbs has done. Those are their quotes.

And through all that, they keep saying that we're going to win a bunch of Super Bowls. That doesn't sound like a front office that's about to fire their OC. Especially since they re-upped his contract this past offseason.
  • 0

You say bark, I say bite. You say shark, I say "Hey, man! Jaws was never my scene and I don't like Star Wars."

#BOAD

#15 Ed_Reed20

Ed_Reed20

    Crenshaw Pete

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,916 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 17 September 2012 - 10:17 AM

Multiple 3rd and short situations squandered by us trying to pass for a first down. RR needs 25-30 touches a game


He doesn't need to get a prerequisite number of touches per game. With the way the Eagles game was flowing, he definitely deserved more touches on the ground though.
  • 0
"...when Sean Taylor is in the neighborhood, you will feel him." - Al Michaels

Posted Image

ER20 takes off and then gets distracted by a debate going on...


#16 callahan09

callahan09

    Pro Bowler

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,089 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

Posted 17 September 2012 - 11:44 AM

Not running rice was a mistake . He was breaking big runs on every touch.


They shut us down in the second half.

10 carries for 92 yards in the first half. 9.20 yards per carry.
11 carries for 19 yards in the second half. 1.73 yards per carry.

Edited by callahan09, 17 September 2012 - 12:46 PM.

  • 0




#17 hawkprey

hawkprey

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,808 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 September 2012 - 11:46 AM

I don't know what the point of the no-huddle would've been in the second half. Usually you run it to tire out the defense, but the third quarter alone took at least an hour and fifteen minutes because the refs couldn't figure out what to do.
  • 0

Losers always say "Next time's gonna be different!". That's right, next time you're gonna lose again


#18 Twistidfunk

Twistidfunk

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 657 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York City

Posted 17 September 2012 - 12:17 PM

Every time we lose a tight game we ALWAYS wonder why Rice wasn't running more? Our recipe for success revolves around this man. Use it. The Ravens need to stop trying to be something they are not.

I really wanted Flacco to turn a corner this year and he seemingly did but after yesterday, it is clear what he is. A good but inconsistent QB. He can go out and look spectacular then completely crap the bed a week later. It is maddening.

I know the line collapsed at times but that happens to every team. Flacco was making some bad decisions with the ball - FACT. Throwing into double coverages and trying to force the ball on a lot of passes.

Some were just plain bad passes like the ones to Pitta and Rice- our last two plays.

With that said, that call on Jones for our TD called back was atrocious. One of the worst calls I have seen in a long long time.

With that said, we are still better off with Joe than probably 20 other qb's in the league
  • 0

#19 reediddy

reediddy

    MVP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,052 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego, CA

Posted 17 September 2012 - 12:56 PM

He doesn't need to get a prerequisite number of touches per game. With the way the Eagles game was flowing, he definitely deserved more touches on the ground though.


Maybe "need" is the wrong word, but how about "deserve." A player of his caliber deserves that many touches at the least
  • 0
...right?

Man coverage on Boldin is LOL.


Posted Image

SUPER BOWL CHAMPS 2012-13
I believed it all along too...

#20 Ed_Reed20

Ed_Reed20

    Crenshaw Pete

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,916 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 17 September 2012 - 12:59 PM

Maybe "need" is the wrong word, but how about "deserve." A player of his caliber deserves that many touches at the least


I still disagree. Not every game is going to dictate him touching the ball that much, as we saw against Cincy.
  • 0
"...when Sean Taylor is in the neighborhood, you will feel him." - Al Michaels

Posted Image

ER20 takes off and then gets distracted by a debate going on...





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users