General Opinions on Courtney's First start.
#1
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:18 PM
Anyone else notice any plays where he was involved that were either positive or negative?
#2
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:20 PM
#3
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:20 PM

#4
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:22 PM
#5
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:30 PM
#6
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:34 PM
He started slow but he sure did pick it up quick! By the 3rd qtr I was noticing #91 flying all over the place.
It was good to see. That is what he was known for. Maybe not the fastest but a high motor.
#7
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:36 PM
He started slow but he sure did pick it up quick! By the 3rd qtr I was noticing #91 flying all over the place.
Definitely noticed him more in the second half. He was getting through the oline and had some good rushes on third downs. I like him and think he can be a real force for our D
#8
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:56 PM
#9
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:01 PM
Upshaw did not start, McClellan did. He looked alright when he was in and got the sack. Really he should be starting, we know McClellan isn't a quality OLB. The defense does need to get more pressure overall, and if he's ok now I wouldn't be surprised to see him get the start in a week or two.
No idea why you got negged for this but I fixed it lol
I completely agree. Our pressure seemed to correlate with Upshaw entering the game. Now, it is also possible that this is entirely coincidental and it was the fact that with the lead we held Pees felt more comfortable getting creative with the pressure. I do not want to see that first half defense anymore. I hope Pees has learned his lesson and is done with whatever experiment he was running.
#10
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:03 PM
I completely agree. Our pressure seemed to correlate with Upshaw entering the game. Now, it is also possible that this is entirely coincidental and it was the fact that with the lead we held Pees felt more comfortable getting creative with the pressure. I do not want to see that first half defense anymore. I hope Pees has learned his lesson and is done with whatever experiment he was running.
We'll see, but Pees didn't run a blitz heavy scheme during his time with New England. Excluding his last year, they generally had good defenses, they just weren't blitz heavy. It'll be tough for him here though, I don't know of any Ravens fan who likes seeing a three man rush. It brings me back to the dark times, to the Mattison.
#11
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:23 PM
#12
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:26 PM
#13
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:30 PM
He started slow but he sure did pick it up quick! By the 3rd qtr I was noticing #91 flying all over the place.
Same opinion as this guy.
Started seeing him everywhere in 3rd qtr. He was getting walled pretty fast early in game. I think he picked up a few things. Hope that train keeps movign
#14
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:31 PM
Love it....when a crazy starts talking jibberish, we're like vultures
#15
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:32 PM
this guy? i have a name kind sirSame opinion as this guy.
Started seeing him everywhere in 3rd qtr. He was getting walled pretty fast early in game. I think he picked up a few things. Hope that train keeps movign
Edited by BMORElegacy, 10 September 2012 - 11:32 PM.
#16
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:33 PM
haha sorry my man.this guy? i have a name kind sir
#17
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:34 PM
I'm just playing. Nothing can bring me down from the high I got after that win lolhaha sorry my man.
#18
Posted 11 September 2012 - 12:02 AM
Atlanta Falcons GM
1st Round - Manti Te'o ILB, Notre Dame
2nd Round - Jamie Collins OLB, Southern Miss
4th Round - Cobi Hamilton WR, Arkansas
4th Round (Comp) - Montori Hughes DT, Tennessee-Martin
6th Round - Sanders Commings CB/S, Georgia
7th Round - Cooper Taylor SS, Richmond
7th Round (Comp) - Quinton Dial DE, Alabama
7th Round (Comp) - Zach Anderson OLB/DE, Northern Michigan
#19
Posted 11 September 2012 - 12:13 AM
Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose.
Rings don't lie.
PSN Alexir23
#20
Posted 11 September 2012 - 08:04 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















