God Bless Joe Flacco For This

[gabefergy]

[quote name='BmoreInBmore' timestamp='1324279621' post='912770']

If you didn't understand it the first time, I'm not going to waste my time repeating it to you.
[/quote]
No I understood completely. You obviously dont understand the term contradict, but we can just leave it at that if you so choose.

[BmoreInBmore]

[quote name='gabefergy' timestamp='1324279743' post='912771']
No I understood completely. You obviously dont understand the term contradict, but we can just leave it at that if you so choose.
[/quote]

Don't be salty cause your wrong, I don't have the time to spell out every thing I say to each person on this forum cause they have a hard time understanding things, sorry I can't be your tutor.

[gabefergy]

[quote name='BmoreInBmore' timestamp='1324281448' post='912792']

Don't be salty cause your wrong, I don't have the time to spell out every thing I say to each person on this forum cause they have a hard time understanding things, sorry I can't be your tutor.
[/quote]
Fine, I'll spell it our for you. You started this whole ordeal by trying to say that Joe Flacco shouldnt be worrying about how much media attention he is getting while taking a few jabs at him along the way[paraphrasing]

My initial point was that in no way or form did Joe Flacco say he deserved more attention by the media. I pointed out that Ravens players in general (specifically Ray Lewis, Ray Rice, and T-Sizzle) do not garner the national media attention that many other player around the NFL get even though we have one of the best teams. I also pointed out as an aside that Joe Flacco has been a very successful QB and was the winningest QB in the history of the NFL through his first 4 seasons so maybe you shouldnt be so hard on the guy.

Your next argument was to say that Tim Tebow is in fact more of a winner because he has won a higher percentage of games this year. While this is true it doesnt take away from the fact that Joe has won 4 times the number of games that Tebow has won ove their careers. So if you want to look at a small sample size and judge strictly by winning percentage than fine Tim Tebow is more of a winner. The fact remains that point has absolutely nothing to do with my original post. You were trying to put words in Flacco's mouth saying he was whining about lack of attention when in fact he never asked for more attention on himself.

You also tried to put words in my mouth, saying:

[quote]So dont say that Flacco deserves to be covered because he wins, and then turn around and contradict yourself by slamming the coverage of Tebow, becuase last i checked he does a lot of that winning stuff too. [/quote]



I never said once that Flacco deserves to be covered because he wins. I also never slammed the coverage of Tebow. All I did was point out that Ravens players in general do not receive a lot of media attention (never once mentioning Flacco) and that Joe never mentioned that he should receive more attention personally.

This is my post:

[quote]Wow. Really? Joe never said [b][i]anything[/i][/b] about himself. He just said his [b][i]team [/i][/b]doesnt get enough media attention. Ray Lewis gets mentioned, but only for 15 sec about whether or not he will play. Ray Rice gets almost zero attention despite leading the NFL in yard from scrimmage. Suggs gets some attention because he is playing lights out, but he doesnt get nearly the praise that guys like Clay Matthews or Troy Palamalu have in the past when they had monster seasons.

You just sound like the typical media pundit who hates Joe Flacco despite being one of the winningest QBs [b][i]ever[/i][/b] at this stage of his career [/quote]

So if you actually read what I said you will see that I never in fact contradicted myself. Any contradiction was entitely made up in your head.

[JohnJohnson]

[quote name='BmoreInBmore' timestamp='1324279152' post='912765']

"I took that to mean" Don't care what you think about it, you obviously didn't get my point.

And I simply said that you can't validate the coverage of Flacco based on the argument of winning, while criticizing the coverage of Tebow, because if anything that's what he has been able to accomplish this season. But, you obviously didn't get that either; and don't even bother responding back, I will neither read nor respond.
[/quote]

You said "Flacco is just salty," which ANYONE would take to mean that his comments are not justified. Flacco simply said what we all know, that the Tim Tebow coverage is ridiculous and he hasn't done anything different than other teams like the Ravens have done, go 6-1 or 7-1 in a string of games and get some lucky breaks against mediocre teams.

But like I said, this isn't a conversation worth having, because you don't even understand what your own words mean/imply. Please, don't bother reading or responding, because I doubt both your reading comprehension and your ability to provide a response worth reading.

[BirdWatcher]

too many personal attacks and insults to save this thread