Is Causing Injuries Intentional?

[carlostelevida]

so i wonder, it's that hard to know the intentions of a team, trained to injured the opossing team players. after just 2 weeks, is just too big the numbers of star injured players, it's that a cause of concern, or just a casualty?

what do you think guys ? should the league start to look for the teams that like to hawk opposing star offensive players, to me one thing is to play aggressive defense or offense and another is to injure a player.

referred to my old deleted post, sory about the racist comments, and my apologize to the others members forums.

[BloodRaven]

Individually or as a team you can never tell if there is intention to injure unless it is obvious (like helmet to helmet hits). Ive had coaches tell my defensive unit to target certain players in certain ways. Then we all try and win an Oscar when theyre taken away in a golf cart.

Dont buy into everything people say. "Oh I fell over and hit his knee" lol.

[FerrariFan87]

Analysts, et al. are constantly saying how opposing defenses look for your weaknesses and try to expose them (within the rules of the game) either with "friendly" shoves after a play, a little twist of the ankle at the bottom of a pile, or a blocker going low on a guy coming off of a knee surgery. For this fact, NFL teams are VERY quiet with regards to injuries of players, as much as they can be within the rules. If someone has a broken bone in their hand, for example, but can still play, a coach might just list it as "hand" on the injury report, with nobody really knowing the extent of the injury (or which hand)...

[carlostelevida]

the nfl take care of this too

[url="http://blogs.nfl.com/2008/09/18/goodell-getting-tough-on-illegal-hits/"]http://blogs.nfl.com/2008/09/18/goodell-ge...n-illegal-hits/[/url]