Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Gordo52

'11 Cornerbacks

   63 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you rather have the Ravens resign?

    • Josh Wilson
      58
    • Chris Carr
      5
  2. 2. Overall which free agent do the Ravens need to resign the most

    • Josh Wilson
      3
    • Marshall Yanda
      37
    • Jared Gaither
      17
    • Chris Carr
      0
    • LeRon McClain
      4
    • Dawan Landry
      0
    • Chris Chester
      2

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

38 posts in this topic

[quote name='Proxzyn' timestamp='1307911205' post='696051']
I'll take Yanda at guard with Harewood or Reid at tackle over Chester at guard and an injury prone diva at tackle any day.

I never mentioned Reid or Harewood being as good as Gaither was, but none of us know anything about Gaithers condition right now, or if he's able to play at the same level he once did, or even play at all.
[/quote]
Why so instead of getting abused by just harrison, now we can give Woodley even more of a reason to shoot his mouth off. And I am not sure why we cant have both.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='ArmyRaven52' timestamp='1307909207' post='696040']
Oh and I know pro bowls arent the ONLY measure of talent but, if you make it you are regarded at least top 3 at your position.
[/quote]

Being regarded as a top-3 player and actually performing to that level are two different things.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Ed_Reed20' timestamp='1307913093' post='696079']
Being regarded as a top-3 player and actually performing to that level are two different things.
[/quote]
Ok I get that pro-bowl voting can be somewhat biased. That being said for some reason I dont think you make it off of just hype. At some point most people who make it were probably top 3 at their position.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='ArmyRaven52' timestamp='1307909207' post='696040']
Oh and I know pro bowls arent the ONLY measure of talent but, if you make it you are regarded at least top 3 at your position.
[/quote]
Using that logic, wouldn't it be Top 6? Considering that 3 RBs are chosen from AFC and NFC?
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='-Truth-' timestamp='1307913972' post='696086']
Using that logic, wouldn't it be Top 6? Considering that 3 RBs are chosen from AFC and NFC?
[/quote]

I was talking just divisional, because when talking about the o line I was talking about pro-bowls and thought it would be implied that I meant division seeing as none of our players will be going for the NFC. Sorry for the confusion.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='ArmyRaven52' timestamp='1307908974' post='696039']
[b][/b]


Exactly how much do you think a rookie, 3rd round, RT is going to command for his contract. And do you think he could be a better RT than Oher was. If we can get gaither back think about it man, Gaither pro-bowl LT material, Ben Grubbs pro-bowler, Birk pro-bowler, Yanda pro-bowl RG material, pro-bowl RT material. I think that owuld be the most disgusting Oline in the league. That would afford Joe more time, RR more running Lanes. If we were to not resign gaither then we have a pro-bowl C & G, with yanda at RT he isnt going to be as dominant as Oher, so you really hurt your oline because Oher is a dominant LT (yet, hopefully will) Yanda is not a dominant RT, and cousins/chester/ or moll will not be a dominant G. So really you just damaged 3 parts of your line by letting 1 go and the resulting shuffle.
[/quote]
For this upcoming year I am hoping these 4th year players will be RFAs, if not I think Yanda is more important because he is more dependable. I agree that an Oline with a healthy Gaither and Yanda would be ideal. However, if I had to choose 1 going forward into 11' Yanda is more important.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='ArmyRaven52' timestamp='1307910834' post='696047']
Hold on now to say a rookie, and a second year tackle who are not the combination of size, strength, and nastiness is crazy. If they were this would not be a discussion because we would be talking about how well Harewood played LT last year. And if reality calls and Reid and Harewood are not as good as gaither (seriously doubt) then we have to move yanda to tackle anyway and then chester will be at guard anyway. And seriously man, if you think Harewood or Reid are going to be as good as Gaither or even Oher his rookie year, then I wish I could share your optimism.
[/quote]
All I know is that Harewood did not play a snap in 2010 and John Matsko has left his project in the dust....LOL!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Alexir' timestamp='1307548616' post='694459']
[b]Blows my mind how different everyones opinion is[/b]. I thought every would say Wilson for first question and Yanda for second question.
[/quote]

you shouldn't be surprised by that...we're all different people and we all see things differently! that is the beauty of us all having our "own" opinions. lol!

my opinion is that we keep Wilson.

~Mili
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites