Divisional All-Star Team?

[thewarden86]

[quote name='Reddawn36' date='06 March 2010 - 02:01 AM' timestamp='1267858876' post='370853']
I'm sorry ... did you mean the Flacco who has suffered from lackofwidereceiver syndrome?


put Ben in that situation and see how he fares...
[/quote]

Ben's a proven winner homie.

[Reddawn36]

[quote name='thewarden86' date='06 March 2010 - 01:07 PM' timestamp='1267898866' post='371233']
Ben's a proven winner homie.
[/quote]

and Flacco's not?

[thewarden86]

[quote name='Reddawn36' date='06 March 2010 - 01:13 PM' timestamp='1267899235' post='371248']
and Flacco's not?
[/quote]

What's their record head-to-head?

[Reddawn36]

[quote name='thewarden86' date='07 March 2010 - 11:33 AM' timestamp='1267979604' post='371921']
What's their record head-to-head?
[/quote]

lets take a look back here

Flacco kept up and beat a high powered SD offense

Flacco had a game winning drive going down against "the team of the decade" before mark clayton dropped a ball that hit him in the chest

Flacco made a 17 point come back against a very good Minnesota team, and had a game winning drive going down only to have the kicker miss it

Flacco had a game tying TD to Derrick Mason after (I believe) 2 TD's got called back due to penalties in the same drive.... and Mason dropped it

Flacco lead a come back against the Browns last year when they were up by 14 or so points (yeah I know its the browns... but they beat you guys)



I did not deny anything about Ben... yes he is a winner.... but my argument is why in Petes sake do you have Flacco behind Palmer if your argument is that Palmer hasn't won a playoff game

(and yes my bias has Flacco over Ben)

while Flacco has a 3-2 record in the playoffs.....

[Ravenskid2085]

[quote name='thewarden86' date='05 March 2010 - 04:43 PM' timestamp='1267825412' post='369694']

[b]RB Rashard Mendenhall
RB Ray Rice[/b]
RB Ced Benson

[b]P Daniel Sepulveda[/b]

[b][size="4"]

UNSTOPPABLE!!!![/size][/b]
[/quote]

I'd flip flop those two, I know I may be a little biased, but I think Ray Rice is one of the top 5 backs in the league after last season

And I'd also put Sam Koch in at punter, since IMO he's the best in the league.

But I agree with the rest of the team pretty much.

[Shawn`]

Joe should be a back up to Ben, not to Carson.

How many playoff games as Palmer won compared to Flacco?

[thewarden86]

[quote name='Reddawn36' date='07 March 2010 - 12:39 PM' timestamp='1267983557' post='371950']
lets take a look back here

Flacco kept up and beat a high powered SD offense

Flacco had a game winning drive going down against "the team of the decade" before mark clayton dropped a ball that hit him in the chest

Flacco made a 17 point come back against a very good Minnesota team, and had a game winning drive going down only to have the kicker miss it

Flacco had a game tying TD to Derrick Mason after (I believe) 2 TD's got called back due to penalties in the same drive.... and Mason dropped it

Flacco lead a come back against the Browns last year when they were up by 14 or so points (yeah I know its the browns... but they beat you guys)



I did not deny anything about Ben... yes he is a winner.... [b]but my argument is why in Petes sake do you have Flacco behind Palmer if your argument is that Palmer hasn't won a playoff game[/b]

(and yes my bias has Flacco over Ben)

while Flacco has a 3-2 record in the playoffs.....
[/quote]

Because the majority of the starters are Steelers and Ravens. I had to throw out a few bones. Besides, it's MY team and Flacco is my gopher (go-for).

*snicker*

[Reddawn36]

[quote name='thewarden86' date='08 March 2010 - 03:39 PM' timestamp='1268080756' post='372785']
[b]Because the majority of the starters are Steelers and Ravens.[/b] I had to throw out a few bones. Besides, it's MY team and Flacco is my gopher (go-for).

*snicker*
[/quote]

I fail to see why its their fault that Clevelend and Cincy suck all around

[JonM229]

As much as I hate to admit it, I'd take Ben over Flacco. At least for right now. Ben reminds me of McNair in his prime, only with more rings.