TurkishRaven

Members
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    277

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TurkishRaven

  2. Posted · Report post

    1 hour ago, flynismo said:

    Something to consider is that finding a replacement for Romo is very high on Dallas' priority list. Don't be surprised if two QBs go before we pick...which is obviously a dream come true scenario for us. 

    Or a qb needy team moving up to 1st. 

    How about 3 qbs before we pick? 

    1st 49ers Goff

    2nd Browns Wentz

    4th Dallas Lynch

     

    Tunsil or Ramsey comes to us. Please don't wake me up ...

    0

  4. Posted · Report post

    33 minutes ago, 757RavensFan said:

    I hear, ya.  I just don't see the Rams giving up two 2nds to move up 9 spots for the one available QB.

    Using your own analogy, why would the Rams give up 2 decent guys for a QB that's far from elite in this week QB class?  

    Goff is a local kid and rams are moving to LA so it makes sense. If I was a rams fan I would be very excited to see a new local qb instead of 3 decent guys. 

    But that's just me. 

     

    12 minutes ago, bMore Heathen said:

    Eagles don't have a 2nd this year, they traded it for Bradford. 

     

    And normally i woukd would agree that 3 good guys is better than 1 elite, but we have very few elite players right now. We are in desperate need of one. And this is our highest draft pick in since Jamal Lewis, we need to take an elite player at 6, no question.

     

    But our team is also getting old. This is a perfect year to get younger without giving up too much. In 2 years these guys will groom and by the time Suggs, Doom, Weedle, Smith and other 'old' players retire they will be there. Not an instant coffee but for me it's more valuable.

    I dont want to go through full rebuilding years.

    0

  5. Posted · Edited by TurkishRaven · Report post

    39 minutes ago, 757RavensFan said:

     

    Lets just say the Ravens' big board has the following players listed in this order;

    Jack, Buckner, Hargreaves and Bosa.  Why take that risk of losing out on their highest rated player still available(Jack in this scenario)

    by moving back?

    Well, it all depends on the trading partner and the offer. Let's say eagles want to move up to get their qb before 49ers and giving up their 2nd. We would still get one of the elite guys.

     

    Or rams giving up 2 2nds. We will have 15th, 36th, 43rd and 45th. We can even move up to late first and still have a 2nd rounder. 

     

    Which one is better?

    1 elite guy or 3 decent guys.

    0

  6. Posted · Report post

    33 minutes ago, 757RavensFan said:

    Cowboys are bringing in Ezekial Elliott for a visit.  If they did happen to draft him that's 3 possible offensive guys taken in the top 6. 

    Tunsil at 1, QB at 2 and Elliott at 4.  That would possibly leave; Jack, Bosa, Buckner, Hargreaves available for us at 6th.  I can't 

    see us trading back if this scenario pans out.  

    Really? I would 100% trade back in that scenario. For me, we should not trade back if there is only one elite prospect available at 6, if there are more than 3 then just trade back and hope for the best.

     

     

    0

  8. Posted · Edited by TurkishRaven · Report post

    I did not watch a single college game last year and first time in my life watched all the Ravens games in a season. So don't count on me.

    After watching the highlights, I think Kendall fuller is a better pick than Alexander. 

    Alexander will be getting a lot of flags with that coverage in NFL. He is not turning his head and using his hands too much. 

    Fuller is the opposite, he is a playmaker and keeps attacking the ball not the player.

     

    1

  9. Posted · Edited by TurkishRaven · Report post

    32 minutes ago, berad said:

    That's what I'm thinking. Even assuming if Cleveland takes a QB, there would be teams trying to jump San Fransisco to get the other top prospect. Even the Eagles at 8 could want to move up. The Rams and Jets would need a lot of capital to move up from 15 and 20, respectively, and I bet Ozzie would be tempted to take it.

    I am all in for trading down. Looks like we did good job in FA but our team is still old. This is a great opportunity for Ravens to get young without loosing talent.

    I take 4 or 5 good players over 1 great and 2 good players. 

    1

  13. Posted · Report post

    7 minutes ago, allblackraven said:

    According to: http://walterfootball.com/ProspectMeetings/ByTeam

    •  
    BAL.gif Baltimore Ravens

    No. 1 Team Need
    Two Cornerbacks
    See the other needs ...
    • Mackensie Alexander, CB, Clemson (COM)
    • Joey Bosa, DE/3-4OLB, Ohio State (COM)
    • James Bradberry, CB, Samford (SR)
    • Sean Davis, FS/CB, Maryland (COM)
    • Kenyan Drake, RB, Alabama (SR)
    • Tyrone Holmes, DE, Montana (EW)
    • Jay Lee, WR, Baylor (SR)
    • Tyler Matakevich, ILB/OLB, Temple (SR)
    • David Onyemata, DT, Manitoba (EW)
    • Reggie Ragland, ILB, Alabama (PRI)
    • Jalen Ramsey, CB/S, Florida State (COM)
    • Noah Spence, OLB/DE/3-4OLB, Eastern Kentucky (COM)
    • Ronnie Stanley, OT, Notre Dame (COM)
    • Charles Tapper, DE/3-4DE, Oklahoma (COM)
    • Laremy Tunsil, OT, Ole Miss (COM)
    • Cody Whitehair, G, Kansas State (SR)

     

    No Hargreaves?

    0

  15. Posted · Report post

    12 minutes ago, Willbacker said:

    Replacing one injury prone player with another injury prone player makes very little sense plus what money are we using. I say just stick with Monroe,see what shakes out in the draft and then scan the cut wire.

    I think the idea is to keep Monroe and get Clady as a backup in case Monroe goes down. 

    0

  16. Posted · Report post

    I am not a football expert but I would love to see us targeting LT before the draft. That's the only missing part in our offense and I don't want us to spend #6 for Stanley..

     

    That way we can spend our first 2 maybe even first 3 picks on defense. Hargreaves at 6 and 2 DEs at second and third.

    1