JimmyBlack

More than likely, the pick will be between Bosa, Buckner, or Stanley.

I think that getting Jack, Bosa, or Buckner would be an awesome pick. I'm not so sure that Hargreaves is worth the 6th pick, so it's better that we trade down to get him. On the other hand, trading up to get Ramsey might be much better. 1. Joey Bosa* DE Ohio State 96 2. Laremy Tunsil* OT Mississippi 95 3. DeForest Buckner DE Oregon 95 4. Jalen Ramsey* CB Florida St 94 5. Ezekiel Elliott* RB Ohio State 92 6. Ronnie Stanley OT Notre Dame 92 7. V. Hargreaves I.* CB Florida 92 8. Myles Jack* OLB UCLA 92 Reference: Scout Inc.

The numbers don't lie. We need money to sign our draft picks.

i would offer him 4 million a year for 2 years with a healthy bonus. Having speed draws the defense back into coverage allowing holes to open up in the line for the running game. We were so predictable last year with the dink and dunk approach. If he won't take a low price, then forget him and draft a receiver in the second round.

I love this signing. Welcome to Baltimore, Eric.

I really like how Ozzie is aggressively going after the right player at the right price.

Ozzie does things in a certain way. Sometimes the bpa formula doesn't seem to fit the player that we the fans want to see us draft.

You are thinking of Lee Evans, not Wallace. At least Wallace has playoff experience. I don't remember him dropping many passes from Benny.

I would prefer Bosa or Buckner over Jack simply because of the injury. Any one of them may be available when we pick. The only way we would trade up would be to grab Ramsey or Tunsil, but the cost would be enormous.

i think that if we don't get Buckner or Bosa, then we will go with an OL. Too bad there isn't anyone like Ogden in the draft this year.

I see this as the year that the Ravens finally get that starter in the first round that clearly is a talent that we can't afford to pass on. That said, I would prioritize the needs and BPA to fit the player that is available. It would be tough to pass on someone like Buckner or Bosa.

I don't think it's more sure now than before KO was "half-officially" gone. Stanley was already the safest bet anyway. If we had the chance, then we should just jump them all and take Tunsil. It might cost us a ton of draft picks but he is the only true first round worthy LT in the draft this year.

Bolden would be a solid receiver that Flacco knows. I would love to have White if they can't get Bolden.

I just hope that he makes it through the exhibition games without injury.

Daniels would ensure that they cut the 'roid rookie of the year.

He might be a backup on most teams but he will come in as the number one TE on the Ravens. Hopefully, he can teach the young ones how to score TDs for Flacco.

I'm pretty sure that we will pick up at least 2 CBs in the 3rd round or later.

Packman has serious stats but he scares me with the off field issues. If we are going to break the bank, then we'd be best off going with a younger player like Jenkins. I see the Ravens picking up some super low tier guy or waiting until there are some decent players released later in camp. I seriously doubt that we go CB in the 1st round of the draft.

I'd love to see the Ravens pick up a few guys in FA to take some of the pressure off of the staff heading into the draft. A few other guys who may not break the bank, but provide depth might be, Chris Johnson (RB), James Laurinaitis (MLB), Patrick Robinson (CB), or Ladarius Green (TE).

I remember sitting at M & T believing that our linebackers were incapable of dropping back into pass coverage and waiting for the opponent to throw over the middle repeatedly to exploit this weakness.

Suggs is hungry to get after the QB.

Maybe he was the sober driver of the bunch and he was doing everyone a favor. This is minor. No punches thrown in any elevators. Pick up the flag and move on.

I would reward him with a renegotiated contract that frees up more cap space. Besides, if we draft Bosa, then we will still have an awesome pass rush and run stopping ability despite him taking the year off last year to nurse his injury.

Bleacher Report had him ranked at number 10 last year at this time after he ran a 4.24 in the scouting combine. They also cautioned that Perriman could be a boom or bust potential player. On the other hand, Dynasty Blast had him ranked number 2. Injury aside, I want to see it translate to the field of play before I pass my final decision on whether or not Perriman remains a bust or a disappointment (e.g. Marc Clayton). As for last year, he has no statistics to prove that he ever played the game in the NFL yet. I'm a mathematician, not a football coach, statistics don't lie, Sami.

He turned out to be a bust last year rather than the immediate impact player that we imagined him to be on draft day.